Executive Solution Overview
**files (1)** – ## WK8instructions.docx **## WK8instructions.docx** In this Assignment, you will review four (4) existing research **focused on the application of clinical systems** and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and …
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (1)**
– ## WK8instructions.docx
**## WK8instructions.docx**
In this Assignment, you will review four (4) existing research
**focused on the application of clinical systems** and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.
Read the assignment instructions and rubric carefully.
In a 4- to 5-page paper,
**synthesize** the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as
**an Annotated Bibliography**. Be sure to address the following:
·
**Identify the four (4)** peer-reviewed, current (published within the last 5 years), scholarly articles. The research
**should provide evidence** to support the use of
**one type** of
**clinical system** to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies. Cite each in APA format.
Examples:
·
· Use of virtual reality exposure therapy for patients with PTSD, for pain management, or neurorehabilitation
· Use of remote patient monitoring for patients on home dialysis monitoring
· Use of continuous glucose monitors for diabetes management
· Use of CDSS in sepsis management
· Use of EHR ED tracking board for improving ED throughput
· Include
**an introduction** explaining the purpose of the paper.
·
**Summarize** **each study**.
**Avoid direct quotations**.
**Paraphrase, explain, and integrate information** obtained from peer-reviewed research with appropriate citation to demonstrate your knowledge, synthesis, and critical thinking.
·
**For each study**,
**explain the improvement** **to outcomes, efficiencies**, and reflect on
**lessons learned** from the application of the clinical system. Be specific and provide examples.
· In your
**conclusion**, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.
· Use APA format and include a title page.
· For information about
**annotated bibliographies**, visit
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writing/apa/annotated-bibliographiesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writing/apa/annotated-bibliographies)
Use appropriate
**APA headings to organize your paper** by topics and subtopics. Proofread for any grammar, spacing, citation, and reference list APA issues. Below are helpful links:
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereviewLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview)
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidenceLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidence)
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/referencesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/references)
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/citationsLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/citations)
**NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed. | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 100
**## WK8instructions.docx**
In this Assignment, you will review four (4) existing research
**focused on the application of clinical systems** and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.
Read the assignment instructions and rubric carefully.
In a 4- to 5-page paper,
**synthesize** the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as
**an Annotated Bibliography**. Be sure to address the following:
·
**Identify the four (4)** peer-reviewed, current (published within the last 5 years), scholarly articles. The research
**should provide evidence** to support the use of
**one type** of
**clinical system** to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies. Cite each in APA format.
Examples:
·
· Use of virtual reality exposure therapy for patients with PTSD, for pain management, or neurorehabilitation
· Use of remote patient monitoring for patients on home dialysis monitoring
· Use of continuous glucose monitors for diabetes management
· Use of CDSS in sepsis management
· Use of EHR ED tracking board for improving ED throughput
· Include
**an introduction** explaining the purpose of the paper.
·
**Summarize** **each study**.
**Avoid direct quotations**.
**Paraphrase, explain, and integrate information** obtained from peer-reviewed research with appropriate citation to demonstrate your knowledge, synthesis, and critical thinking.
·
**For each study**,
**explain the improvement** **to outcomes, efficiencies**, and reflect on
**lessons learned** from the application of the clinical system. Be specific and provide examples.
· In your
**conclusion**, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.
· Use APA format and include a title page.
· For information about
**annotated bibliographies**, visit
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writing/apa/annotated-bibliographiesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writing/apa/annotated-bibliographies)
Use appropriate
**APA headings to organize your paper** by topics and subtopics. Proofread for any grammar, spacing, citation, and reference list APA issues. Below are helpful links:
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereviewLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview)
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidenceLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidence)
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/referencesLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/references)
[https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/citationsLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/citations)
**NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed. | 40 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.0 ptsGood** Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >2.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 100