[Solved] Literature Review Final

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Follow instruction and rubric

**files (4)**

– ## VIDEOS.docx

– ## LiteratureReviewFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx

– ## LiteratureReview-FinalGradingRubric.pdf

– Read-WarnerIChapters1315-16.pdf

**## VIDEOS.docx**

VIDEO

[https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/919376/pages/watch-writing-a-literature-review?module_item_id=102075010](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/919376/pages/watch-writing-a-literature-review?module_item_id=102075010)

**## LiteratureReviewFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx**

EDCO 745

**Literature Review Final Assignment Instructions**

**Overview**

A literature review is a logical argument based on peer-reviewed research articles. The literature review demonstrates the researcher has thoroughly reviewed the relevant literature and based upon that review, has determined a need for further research. The literature review begins with a discussion of the study’s purpose and results, and then transitions to an argument for the need for further research. You should cite the results portion of other research in this paper and discuss needs for further research. The literature review for this assignment is based upon the topic identified in Module 2.

**Instructions**

**The paper must contain the following elements, using the current APA style:**

1. Title page

2. Abstract

3. Review of Literature

• Both summarize and critically evaluate the current literature on the topic.

• Create within the summary an argument for why this topic is important, and the issues and new research needs to address.

• This must be written in a research-scientific format as if it is to be submitted to a journal for publication (refer to APA handbook and guidelines)

This review may serve as the basis for your future research interests but is to be based upon the topic selected in Module 2. For a sufficient overview of the literature, your review must be
**7–10 pages** of empirically-based, critical writing.

**Your review must:**

1. Summarize the research in a logical, sequential manner

2. Make a case for why additional research needs to be conducted to fill important gaps in the scientific literature

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

**## LiteratureReview-FinalGradingRubric.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Literature
Review Co
mposition

22 to >20 pts

Advanced

• The student
composed a 7–10
page literature
review that
included all
required sections
and applied all the
sources
meaningfully.

20 to >18 pts

Proficient

• The student
composed a 7–10
page literature
review that included
all required sections
and applied most of
the sources
meaningfully.

18 to >16 pts

Developing

• The student
composed a 5–6
page literature
review that included
all or most of the
required sections
and applied some
of the sources
meaningfully.

16 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The student
composed a 1–4
page literature
review that included
some of the
required sections
and applied few of
the sources
meaningfully.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

22 pts

Literature
Review
Summary
of the
Research

53 to >48 pts

Advanced

• The student’s
summary included
ample arguments
for why further
research was
warranted for the
selected
counseling topic
and clearly
identified research
question(s) that
should be
addressed.

48 to >44 pts

Proficient

• The student’s
summary included
arguments for why
further research was
warranted for the
selected counseling
topic and identified
research
question(s).

44 to >40 pts

Developing

• The student’s
summary needed to
be developed more
fully. Arguments
lacked sufficient
information why
further research
was warranted for
the selected
counseling topic
and identified
research
question(s).

40 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The student’s
summary did not
include arguments
for why further
research was
warranted for the
selected counseling
topic and identified
research
question(s).

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

53 pts

Literature
Review
Evaluation
of the
Research

30 to >27 pts

Advanced

• Evaluation of
literature is
thoroughly
assessed using
point comparisons
/contrasts, raising
questions, and/or
noting strengths/w
eaknesses with
supportive
evidence
demonstrated
critical thinking
and personal
application to
selected
counseling topic.

27 to >25 pts

Proficient

• Evaluation of
literature is
assessed using
point comparisons/c
ontrasts, questions,
and/or noting streng
ths/weaknesses
with supportive
evidence.

25 to >22 pts

Developing

• The student’s
evaluation of
literature is weak. C
omparisons/contras
ts, raising
questions, and/or
noting strengths/we
aknesses need
improvement.

22 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The student’s
evaluation of
literature is very
weak or absent. Co
mparisons/contrast
s, raising questions,
and/or noting streng
ths/weaknesses
needs significant
improvement;
Supportive
evidence was
lacking.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

30 pts

Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Style 23 to >21 pts

Advanced

• The literature
review properly
uses current APA
style and reflects
doctoral writing
quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are formatted
correctly.
• The literature
review reflects a
graduate level
voice and
vocabulary.
• There are very
few spelling and/or
grammar errors.

21 to >19 pts

Proficient

• The literature
review mostly uses
current APA style
and reflects doctoral
writing quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are mostly formatted
correctly.
• The literature
review reflects
generally a graduate
level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are few
spelling and/or
grammar errors.

19 to >17 pts

Developing

• The literature
review uses some
current APA style
and reflects
doctoral writing
quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are sometimes
formatted correctly.
• The literature
review sometimes
reflects a graduate
level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are some
spelling and/or
grammar errors.

17 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The literature
review uses few
current APA style
and reflects
doctoral writing
quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are rarely formatted
correctly.
• The literature
review seldom
reflects a graduate
level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are many
spelling and/or
grammar errors.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

23 pts

Sources 22 to >20 pts

Advanced

• The Reference
page meets or
exceeds the
required number
of sources.
• All reference
page sources are
referenced in at
least one literature
review subheading
area.

20 to >18 pts

Proficient

• The Reference
page meets the
required number of
sources.
• Most reference
page sources are
referenced in at
least one literature
review subheading
area.

18 to >16 pts

Developing

• The Reference
page does not meet
the required
number of sources.
• Some reference
page sources are
not referenced in at
least one literature
review subheading
area.

16 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The Reference
page is not present
or contains few
sources.
• Few reference
page sources are
referenced in a
literature review
subheading area.
.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

22 pts

Total Points: 150

Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620

**Read-WarnerIChapters1315-16.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-warnerichapters1315-16-pdf)

**Read-WarnerIChapters1315-16.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-warnerichapters1315-16-pdf)

**## VIDEOS.docx**

VIDEO

[https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/919376/pages/watch-writing-a-literature-review?module_item_id=102075010](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/919376/pages/watch-writing-a-literature-review?module_item_id=102075010)

**## LiteratureReviewFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx**

EDCO 745

**Literature Review Final Assignment Instructions**

**Overview**

A literature review is a logical argument based on peer-reviewed research articles. The literature review demonstrates the researcher has thoroughly reviewed the relevant literature and based upon that review, has determined a need for further research. The literature review begins with a discussion of the study’s purpose and results, and then transitions to an argument for the need for further research. You should cite the results portion of other research in this paper and discuss needs for further research. The literature review for this assignment is based upon the topic identified in Module 2.

**Instructions**

**The paper must contain the following elements, using the current APA style:**

1. Title page

2. Abstract

3. Review of Literature

• Both summarize and critically evaluate the current literature on the topic.

• Create within the summary an argument for why this topic is important, and the issues and new research needs to address.

• This must be written in a research-scientific format as if it is to be submitted to a journal for publication (refer to APA handbook and guidelines)

This review may serve as the basis for your future research interests but is to be based upon the topic selected in Module 2. For a sufficient overview of the literature, your review must be
**7–10 pages** of empirically-based, critical writing.

**Your review must:**

1. Summarize the research in a logical, sequential manner

2. Make a case for why additional research needs to be conducted to fill important gaps in the scientific literature

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

**## LiteratureReview-FinalGradingRubric.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Literature
Review Co
mposition

22 to >20 pts

Advanced

• The student
composed a 7–10
page literature
review that
included all
required sections
and applied all the
sources
meaningfully.

20 to >18 pts

Proficient

• The student
composed a 7–10
page literature
review that included
all required sections
and applied most of
the sources
meaningfully.

18 to >16 pts

Developing

• The student
composed a 5–6
page literature
review that included
all or most of the
required sections
and applied some
of the sources
meaningfully.

16 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The student
composed a 1–4
page literature
review that included
some of the
required sections
and applied few of
the sources
meaningfully.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

22 pts

Literature
Review
Summary
of the
Research

53 to >48 pts

Advanced

• The student’s
summary included
ample arguments
for why further
research was
warranted for the
selected
counseling topic
and clearly
identified research
question(s) that
should be
addressed.

48 to >44 pts

Proficient

• The student’s
summary included
arguments for why
further research was
warranted for the
selected counseling
topic and identified
research
question(s).

44 to >40 pts

Developing

• The student’s
summary needed to
be developed more
fully. Arguments
lacked sufficient
information why
further research
was warranted for
the selected
counseling topic
and identified
research
question(s).

40 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The student’s
summary did not
include arguments
for why further
research was
warranted for the
selected counseling
topic and identified
research
question(s).

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

53 pts

Literature
Review
Evaluation
of the
Research

30 to >27 pts

Advanced

• Evaluation of
literature is
thoroughly
assessed using
point comparisons
/contrasts, raising
questions, and/or
noting strengths/w
eaknesses with
supportive
evidence
demonstrated
critical thinking
and personal
application to
selected
counseling topic.

27 to >25 pts

Proficient

• Evaluation of
literature is
assessed using
point comparisons/c
ontrasts, questions,
and/or noting streng
ths/weaknesses
with supportive
evidence.

25 to >22 pts

Developing

• The student’s
evaluation of
literature is weak. C
omparisons/contras
ts, raising
questions, and/or
noting strengths/we
aknesses need
improvement.

22 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The student’s
evaluation of
literature is very
weak or absent. Co
mparisons/contrast
s, raising questions,
and/or noting streng
ths/weaknesses
needs significant
improvement;
Supportive
evidence was
lacking.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

30 pts

Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Style 23 to >21 pts

Advanced

• The literature
review properly
uses current APA
style and reflects
doctoral writing
quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are formatted
correctly.
• The literature
review reflects a
graduate level
voice and
vocabulary.
• There are very
few spelling and/or
grammar errors.

21 to >19 pts

Proficient

• The literature
review mostly uses
current APA style
and reflects doctoral
writing quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are mostly formatted
correctly.
• The literature
review reflects
generally a graduate
level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are few
spelling and/or
grammar errors.

19 to >17 pts

Developing

• The literature
review uses some
current APA style
and reflects
doctoral writing
quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are sometimes
formatted correctly.
• The literature
review sometimes
reflects a graduate
level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are some
spelling and/or
grammar errors.

17 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The literature
review uses few
current APA style
and reflects
doctoral writing
quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are rarely formatted
correctly.
• The literature
review seldom
reflects a graduate
level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are many
spelling and/or
grammar errors.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

23 pts

Sources 22 to >20 pts

Advanced

• The Reference
page meets or
exceeds the
required number
of sources.
• All reference
page sources are
referenced in at
least one literature
review subheading
area.

20 to >18 pts

Proficient

• The Reference
page meets the
required number of
sources.
• Most reference
page sources are
referenced in at
least one literature
review subheading
area.

18 to >16 pts

Developing

• The Reference
page does not meet
the required
number of sources.
• Some reference
page sources are
not referenced in at
least one literature
review subheading
area.

16 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The Reference
page is not present
or contains few
sources.
• Few reference
page sources are
referenced in a
literature review
subheading area.
.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

22 pts

Total Points: 150

Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620

**Read-WarnerIChapters1315-16.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-warnerichapters1315-16-pdf)

**## VIDEOS.docx**

VIDEO

[https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/919376/pages/watch-writing-a-literature-review?module_item_id=102075010](https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/919376/pages/watch-writing-a-literature-review?module_item_id=102075010)

**## LiteratureReviewFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx**

EDCO 745

**Literature Review Final Assignment Instructions**

**Overview**

A literature review is a logical argument based on peer-reviewed research articles. The literature review demonstrates the researcher has thoroughly reviewed the relevant literature and based upon that review, has determined a need for further research. The literature review begins with a discussion of the study’s purpose and results, and then transitions to an argument for the need for further research. You should cite the results portion of other research in this paper and discuss needs for further research. The literature review for this assignment is based upon the topic identified in Module 2.

**Instructions**

**The paper must contain the following elements, using the current APA style:**

1. Title page

2. Abstract

3. Review of Literature

• Both summarize and critically evaluate the current literature on the topic.

• Create within the summary an argument for why this topic is important, and the issues and new research needs to address.

• This must be written in a research-scientific format as if it is to be submitted to a journal for publication (refer to APA handbook and guidelines)

This review may serve as the basis for your future research interests but is to be based upon the topic selected in Module 2. For a sufficient overview of the literature, your review must be
**7–10 pages** of empirically-based, critical writing.

**Your review must:**

1. Summarize the research in a logical, sequential manner

2. Make a case for why additional research needs to be conducted to fill important gaps in the scientific literature

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

**## LiteratureReview-FinalGradingRubric.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Literature
Review Co
mposition

22 to >20 pts

Advanced

• The student
composed a 7–10
page literature
review that
included all
required sections
and applied all the
sources
meaningfully.

20 to >18 pts

Proficient

• The student
composed a 7–10
page literature
review that included
all required sections
and applied most of
the sources
meaningfully.

18 to >16 pts

Developing

• The student
composed a 5–6
page literature
review that included
all or most of the
required sections
and applied some
of the sources
meaningfully.

16 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The student
composed a 1–4
page literature
review that included
some of the
required sections
and applied few of
the sources
meaningfully.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

22 pts

Literature
Review
Summary
of the
Research

53 to >48 pts

Advanced

• The student’s
summary included
ample arguments
for why further
research was
warranted for the
selected
counseling topic
and clearly
identified research
question(s) that
should be
addressed.

48 to >44 pts

Proficient

• The student’s
summary included
arguments for why
further research was
warranted for the
selected counseling
topic and identified
research
question(s).

44 to >40 pts

Developing

• The student’s
summary needed to
be developed more
fully. Arguments
lacked sufficient
information why
further research
was warranted for
the selected
counseling topic
and identified
research
question(s).

40 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The student’s
summary did not
include arguments
for why further
research was
warranted for the
selected counseling
topic and identified
research
question(s).

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

53 pts

Literature
Review
Evaluation
of the
Research

30 to >27 pts

Advanced

• Evaluation of
literature is
thoroughly
assessed using
point comparisons
/contrasts, raising
questions, and/or
noting strengths/w
eaknesses with
supportive
evidence
demonstrated
critical thinking
and personal
application to
selected
counseling topic.

27 to >25 pts

Proficient

• Evaluation of
literature is
assessed using
point comparisons/c
ontrasts, questions,
and/or noting streng
ths/weaknesses
with supportive
evidence.

25 to >22 pts

Developing

• The student’s
evaluation of
literature is weak. C
omparisons/contras
ts, raising
questions, and/or
noting strengths/we
aknesses need
improvement.

22 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The student’s
evaluation of
literature is very
weak or absent. Co
mparisons/contrast
s, raising questions,
and/or noting streng
ths/weaknesses
needs significant
improvement;
Supportive
evidence was
lacking.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

30 pts

Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Style 23 to >21 pts

Advanced

• The literature
review properly
uses current APA
style and reflects
doctoral writing
quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are formatted
correctly.
• The literature
review reflects a
graduate level
voice and
vocabulary.
• There are very
few spelling and/or
grammar errors.

21 to >19 pts

Proficient

• The literature
review mostly uses
current APA style
and reflects doctoral
writing quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are mostly formatted
correctly.
• The literature
review reflects
generally a graduate
level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are few
spelling and/or
grammar errors.

19 to >17 pts

Developing

• The literature
review uses some
current APA style
and reflects
doctoral writing
quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are sometimes
formatted correctly.
• The literature
review sometimes
reflects a graduate
level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are some
spelling and/or
grammar errors.

17 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The literature
review uses few
current APA style
and reflects
doctoral writing
quality.
• In-text citations
and references list
are rarely formatted
correctly.
• The literature
review seldom
reflects a graduate
level voice and
vocabulary.
• There are many
spelling and/or
grammar errors.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

23 pts

Sources 22 to >20 pts

Advanced

• The Reference
page meets or
exceeds the
required number
of sources.
• All reference
page sources are
referenced in at
least one literature
review subheading
area.

20 to >18 pts

Proficient

• The Reference
page meets the
required number of
sources.
• Most reference
page sources are
referenced in at
least one literature
review subheading
area.

18 to >16 pts

Developing

• The Reference
page does not meet
the required
number of sources.
• Some reference
page sources are
not referenced in at
least one literature
review subheading
area.

16 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

• The Reference
page is not present
or contains few
sources.
• Few reference
page sources are
referenced in a
literature review
subheading area.
.

0 pts

Not Pre
sent

22 pts

Total Points: 150

Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620

**Read-WarnerIChapters1315-16.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-warnerichapters1315-16-pdf)