Tag: Corporate Finance & Strategic Management

[Solved] djdjjd

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) **Case Study: “The Greenwood Asthma Spike—Understanding Measures of Disease and Epidemiologic Methods”** **Aligned to Chapters 6 & 7** **Scenario** The community of **Greenwood County** (population 142,000) ha…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

**Case Study: “The Greenwood Asthma Spike—Understanding Measures of Disease and Epidemiologic Methods”**

**Aligned to Chapters 6 & 7**

**Scenario**

The community of **Greenwood County** (population 142,000) has seen a reported rise in asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits over the last 18 months. Two healthcare systems— **St. Helena Medical Center** and **Greenwood Regional Hospital**—serve the area and have contributed encounter data to the county public health department.

You are part of a joint analytic team assigned to determine whether the apparent increase represents:

– A true rise in asthma incidence
– A reporting artifact
– A change in healthcare-seeking behavior
– A result of environmental shifts
– Or a combination of these factors

**Available Data**

**Past Year:**

– 2,842 asthma-related ED visits
– Of these visits, **1,118 are repeat visits** within the same year
– **County population:** 142,000
– **Estimated number of individuals with physician-diagnosed asthma:** 15,400
– **Number of newly diagnosed asthma cases recorded this year:** 410

**Environmental data:**

– Air quality index (AQI) exceeded 100 on 37 days (previous year: 14 days)
– Two schools report increased mold concerns following water damage
– New industrial activity began in the east corridor 20 months ago

**Healthcare data:**

– Improved EHR documentation implemented at both hospitals
– Two urgent care centers closed, shifting non-urgent cases to EDs
– School nurse reports indicate rising inhaler use among middle school students

**Student Tasks (4–5 pages)**

**1. Calculate Key Measures of Disease (Ch. 6)**

Using the provided data:

– Calculate **incidence** of asthma in Greenwood County.
– Calculate **prevalence** of asthma.
– Explain the difference in interpretation of incidence vs. prevalence in this scenario.
– Determine whether ED visit counts reflect disease burden accurately.

**2. Evaluate Potential Biases and Errors (Ch. 7)**

Discuss how the following may influence observed trends:

– Improved EHR documentation
– Closure of urgent care centers
– Repeat visits inflating counts
– Potential misclassification

Explain how each could bias either incidence or prevalence.

**3. Interpret Environmental and Demographic Clues**

Analyze whether environmental patterns (AQI, mold exposure, industrial activity) could represent:

– A true increase in incidence
– A non-causal correlation
– A confounder
– An effect modifier

**4. Develop an Analytic Epidemiology Plan**

Propose a study design (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional) to test the hypothesis that air quality changes are contributing to the increase in asthma cases.

Explain:

– Why you chose that study design
– What data you would collect
– How you would measure exposure
– How you would reduce confounding

**5. Identify the Next Steps for Public Health Action**

Recommend three immediate actions the county health department should take based on your findings and interpretation.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Business Finance – Management QSO 321 Module Six Assignment

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) See Attachment **files (1)** – ## ModuleSixAssignmentGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip **## ModuleSixAssignmentGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip** ## Module Six Assignment Guidelines and Rubric.html ## QSO 321 Module Si…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

See Attachment

**files (1)**

– ## ModuleSixAssignmentGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip

**## ModuleSixAssignmentGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip**

## Module Six Assignment Guidelines and Rubric.html

## QSO 321 Module Six Assignment Guidelines and Rubric

### Overview

An important part of any organization’s priorities, as well as an important category of B Corp Certification, is the consideration of added value for customers. In this assignment, you will apply what you have learned about customer expectations and consider how it can be applied to your course project, which is due in Module Seven.

### Directions

You work in the operations department at NationaliTeas, a large international corporation that manufactures and sells tea worldwide. Based on customer feedback and a push to work toward B Corp Certification, the board of directors is looking for new initiative ideas that would increase value to customers. Examples include offering product guarantees, seeking product quality certifications, monitoring customer satisfaction, and more. You have been asked to outline two customer-focused initiatives that can be evaluated by impacted teams for feasibility.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

– Added Customer Value: Briefly describe the added value that your initiative idea brings to customers. Use supporting evidence from course materials in your response.
– Added Business Value: Briefly describe the added value that your initiative idea brings to the organization. Be certain to note the impact of the added customer value on the business. Use evidence from the course materials to support your response.
– Potential Resources: Identify resources that would
likely be needed to complete the outlined initiative. In this case, "resources” might refer to the amount of funding, the materials available, the allocation of employees and their time, and so on.

– Monitoring and Evaluation: Briefly describe how the success of the initiative would be monitored over time and how you would evaluate the criteria for success.

### What to Submit

Submit this assignment as a 500- to 750-word Microsoft Word document. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

### AI Usage

If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow
[these AI usage guidelines](https://snhu.ink/StudentGenAIGuide). You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in
[this Shapiro Library guide](https://snhu.ink/CitationAndAI).

### Module Six Assignment Rubric

| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (100%) | Meets Expectations (85%) | Partially Meets Expectations (55%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Added Customer Value | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Briefly describes the added value the initiative idea brings to customers | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include better supporting the impact of the outlined initiative with evidence from course materials | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Added Business Value | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Briefly describes the added value the outlined initiative idea brings to the organization and clearly notes the connection between adding customer value and organizational value | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include further supporting the impact of the outlined initiative with evidence from the course materials | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Potential Resources | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Identifies resources that would likely be needed to complete the outlined initiative, such as (but not limited to) resources such as funding, materials, allocation of employees, and time | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include identifying more clearly aligned or relevant resources for consideration | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Briefly describes how the success of the initiative would be monitored over time and which criteria would be used for evaluating this success | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include identifying more clearly aligned or relevant metrics, criteria, or monitoring strategies | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 5 |
| Citations and Attributions | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors | Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution | 5 |
| Total: | 100% |

**## ModuleSixAssignmentGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip**

## Module Six Assignment Guidelines and Rubric.html

## QSO 321 Module Six Assignment Guidelines and Rubric

### Overview

An important part of any organization’s priorities, as well as an important category of B Corp Certification, is the consideration of added value for customers. In this assignment, you will apply what you have learned about customer expectations and consider how it can be applied to your course project, which is due in Module Seven.

### Directions

You work in the operations department at NationaliTeas, a large international corporation that manufactures and sells tea worldwide. Based on customer feedback and a push to work toward B Corp Certification, the board of directors is looking for new initiative ideas that would increase value to customers. Examples include offering product guarantees, seeking product quality certifications, monitoring customer satisfaction, and more. You have been asked to outline two customer-focused initiatives that can be evaluated by impacted teams for feasibility.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

– Added Customer Value: Briefly describe the added value that your initiative idea brings to customers. Use supporting evidence from course materials in your response.
– Added Business Value: Briefly describe the added value that your initiative idea brings to the organization. Be certain to note the impact of the added customer value on the business. Use evidence from the course materials to support your response.
– Potential Resources: Identify resources that would
likely be needed to complete the outlined initiative. In this case, "resources” might refer to the amount of funding, the materials available, the allocation of employees and their time, and so on.

– Monitoring and Evaluation: Briefly describe how the success of the initiative would be monitored over time and how you would evaluate the criteria for success.

### What to Submit

Submit this assignment as a 500- to 750-word Microsoft Word document. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

### AI Usage

If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow
[these AI usage guidelines](https://snhu.ink/StudentGenAIGuide). You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in
[this Shapiro Library guide](https://snhu.ink/CitationAndAI).

### Module Six Assignment Rubric

| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (100%) | Meets Expectations (85%) | Partially Meets Expectations (55%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Added Customer Value | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Briefly describes the added value the initiative idea brings to customers | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include better supporting the impact of the outlined initiative with evidence from course materials | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Added Business Value | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Briefly describes the added value the outlined initiative idea brings to the organization and clearly notes the connection between adding customer value and organizational value | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include further supporting the impact of the outlined initiative with evidence from the course materials | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Potential Resources | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Identifies resources that would likely be needed to complete the outlined initiative, such as (but not limited to) resources such as funding, materials, allocation of employees, and time | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include identifying more clearly aligned or relevant resources for consideration | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Briefly describes how the success of the initiative would be monitored over time and which criteria would be used for evaluating this success | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include identifying more clearly aligned or relevant metrics, criteria, or monitoring strategies | Does not attempt criterion | 20 |
| Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 5 |
| Citations and Attributions | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors | Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution | 5 |
| Total: | 100% |

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Unit III Entrepreneurship and Innovative Business Development

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) Please note that your assignments may refer back to the readings and lessons from previous units. For this assignment, there will be 2 parts: an _____ and an accompanying case study. #### **Part 1** Compo…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

Please note that your assignments may refer back to the readings and lessons from previous units.

For this assignment, there will be 2 parts: an _____ and an accompanying case study.

#### **Part 1**

Compose an ______ that responds to the prompts below.

– Describe what is meant by an entrepreneurial mindset. Create three actionable objectives that will help you develop an entrepreneurial mindset and develop a habit of creativity in your current or future career. Each objective should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-based.
– Summarize your own approach to developing a habit of creativity in your future or current career.
– Compare and contrast the types of entrepreneurs in terms of having an entrepreneurial mindset. Do you think one type of entrepreneur exhibits greater evidence of having an entrepreneurial mindset over other types? Why, or why not? Which type do you identify with most?

The Sample _____ provided by the CSU Writing Center shows the type of formatting that is expected for this assignment.

Please include an introduction. This part of your assignment should be at least two pages in length. References should include your eTextbook and a minimum of one additional credible source.

#### **Part 2: Case Study: Saurbh Gupta, Founder of Gyan-I Inc.**

For this part of the unit assignment, read the case study on pages 27 and 28 of the eTextbook. Once you have read and reviewed the case scenario, respond to the following questions with thorough explanations and a well-supported rationale. Do not use the question-and-answer format. Instead, use an e____ format with headings for this assignment.

– Compare the different types of entrepreneurships concerning the amount of risk associated with starting a technology services company. Think about the ramifications of starting a company, where the core product (technology) is changing at a rapid pace.
– Describe Gyan's business model. Why does this business model fit or not fit this organization? Apply one other business model to this case, and then explain whether you think your selected business model would contribute to the company's success and growth or not.
– Analyze the type of entrepreneurship Gyan exhibits. As you think about doing something entrepreneurial, what is your motivation for entering an entrepreneurial activity?

Your case study part of your assignment should be at least two pages in length. References should include your eTextbook and a minimum of one additional credible source. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.

#### **Resources**

The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment.

– [\
\
FormalEssay1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/formalessay1-pdf-10530631 "FormalEssay1.pdf")

November 6, 2026
[Solved] The Structured Interview

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) **Part 1:** Use a job description from your dream job or one for your current job to create 10 essential KSAO’s for a structured interview. (Please refer to Step 4: Determining Essential KSAO's on the Conducti…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

**Part 1:**

Use a job description from your dream job or one for your current job to create 10 essential KSAO’s for a structured interview. (Please refer to Step 4: Determining Essential KSAO's on the Conducting a Job Analysis section that begins on page 49 of your textbook. Nothing should be taken word for word, KSAO's must be created based on the job description)

**Part 2:**

Now that you have your list of essential KSAs and OEs, the next step is to write questions that use those tapped KSAs and OEs. Page 139 of your textbook discusses the different types of questions used in a structured interview. Using this as a guide, write two examples of each type of interview question, making sure you cover all of the essential KSAO’s you listed in part 1.

– [\
\
TheStructuredInterview.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/thestructuredinterview-docx "TheStructuredInterview.docx")
– [\
\
MAN3326Week1AssignmentTemplate1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/man3326week1assignmenttemplate1-docx "MAN3326Week1AssignmentTemplate1.docx")

November 6, 2026
[Solved] RA2

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Financial markets homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-financial-markets)

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Financial markets homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-financial-markets)

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Excel Spreadsheet

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Financial markets homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-financial-markets) See attached **files (1)** – ## FrangoldRealEstateBudgetLab4.xlsx **## FrangoldRealEstateBudgetLab4.xlsx** ## Monthly Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Financial markets homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-financial-markets)

See attached

**files (1)**

– ## FrangoldRealEstateBudgetLab4.xlsx

**## FrangoldRealEstateBudgetLab4.xlsx**

## Monthly Expenses

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Frangold Real Estate Budget |
| Monthly Estimates |
| Income | January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December |
| Commission | 12000 | 12000 | 14000 | 14000 | 16000 | 18500 | 20000 | 18500 | 18500 | 14000 | 14000 | 16500 |
| Interest | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Total | $12,100 | $12,100 | $14,100 | $14,100 | $16,100 | $18,600 | $20,100 | $18,600 | $18,600 | $14,100 | $14,100 | $16,600 |
| Expenses | January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December |
| Rent | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 18000 |
| Utilities | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 |
| Advertising | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
| Website | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Printing | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Office Supplies | 200 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 0 |
| Gas | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Miscellaneous | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
| Total | $2,975 | $2,775 | $2,775 | $2,975 | $2,775 | $2,775 | $2,975 | $2,775 | $2,775 | $2,975 | $2,775 | $2,775 |

## Expense

|
|

January Expenses

1500 325 400 0 200 200 100 250

January Income

12000 100

**## FrangoldRealEstateBudgetLab4.xlsx**

## Monthly Expenses

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Frangold Real Estate Budget |
| Monthly Estimates |
| Income | January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December |
| Commission | 12000 | 12000 | 14000 | 14000 | 16000 | 18500 | 20000 | 18500 | 18500 | 14000 | 14000 | 16500 |
| Interest | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Total | $12,100 | $12,100 | $14,100 | $14,100 | $16,100 | $18,600 | $20,100 | $18,600 | $18,600 | $14,100 | $14,100 | $16,600 |
| Expenses | January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December |
| Rent | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 18000 |
| Utilities | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 | 325 |
| Advertising | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
| Website | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Printing | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Office Supplies | 200 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 0 |
| Gas | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Miscellaneous | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
| Total | $2,975 | $2,775 | $2,775 | $2,975 | $2,775 | $2,775 | $2,975 | $2,775 | $2,775 | $2,975 | $2,775 | $2,775 |

## Expense

|
|

January Expenses

1500 325 400 0 200 200 100 250

January Income

12000 100

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Prof Double R

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) When responding to Justin and Garvin posts, consider the following: – How are the change management examples shared by your peers similar or different from your own? – Are there any additional change managemen…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

When responding to Justin and Garvin posts, consider the following:

– How are the change management examples shared by your peers similar or different from your own?
– Are there any additional change management skills you would recommend to your peers based on their examples? Support your response by referencing relevant topics from the course.

Justin Post

One change initiative I was heavily involved in was a large ERP transformation (SAP S/4HANA) where I led data workstreams across multiple business functions. A big issue we ran into was inconsistent communication, where different teams had different understandings of timelines, data ownership, and expectations, which caused confusion and slowed progress. Looking back, I would have approached this differently by being more intentional about how communication was structured. From what we learned in Organizational Change: Creating Change Through Strategic Communications by Laurie Lewis, communication is really about creating shared meaning, not just pushing out information. I relied a lot on meetings and documentation, but I didn’t always consider how messages were landing with different groups. A more targeted communication approach, along with clearer stakeholder alignment early on, would have likely reduced friction and improved engagement.

One of the biggest takeaways for me from this course is how much leadership behavior impacts employee engagement during change. Concepts from The Leadership Challenge by Kouzes and Posner really reinforced that leaders need to consistently model and reinforce change, not just announce it. I’ve seen firsthand that when leadership messaging is clear and consistent, teams are much more willing to adapt. Going forward, I plan to be more proactive in aligning leaders around key messages and building in feedback loops, like quick check-ins or workshops, to understand how change is actually being received. Overall, this course helped shift my mindset from just managing tasks during change to really focusing on how people experience it.

Garvin Post

In a previous role, I took on responsibility for managing our business unit’s capital project budget. At the time, there wasn’t a clear process to track project status or understand whether projects were over or under budget, which created a lack of visibility for both project teams and leadership.

To address this, I introduced monthly review meetings with project managers and created a standardized, plug-and-play slide deck for updates. This gave each project owner a simple way to share status, highlight risks, and discuss mitigation plans. I also rolled this up into a monthly leadership review, which helped provide a clear, consolidated view of overall budget performance. As a result, we significantly improved transparency, alignment, and proactive decision-making.

Looking back, this approach aligned well with key change management principles like communication and stakeholder engagement. The recurring meetings created consistent messaging, and involving project managers directly helped build accountability and buy-in. That said, I think I could have strengthened the approach by more intentionally applying a formal framework like Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model or the ADKAR Model. While I was doing many of the right things, I didn’t formally focus on areas like building urgency or reinforcing the change long-term.

The biggest takeaway for me from this course is how critical communication, stakeholder involvement, and reinforcement are to making change stick. Going forward, I’d be more intentional about using a structured framework, defining success metrics upfront, and building in reinforcement mechanisms to ensure the change is sustained over time.

Overall, this experience showed me that successful change isn’t just about creating a process, but about making sure people understand it, adopt it, and continue using it.

November 6, 2026
[Solved] math

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

[>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Comp 2 STRCB/581: Strategic Planning And Implementation 2 of 3

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

See word **files (2)** – ## comp2assignmentinstructions.docx – ## strcb581_v1_comp2_rubric.pdf **## comp2assignmentinstructions.docx** STRCB/581 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation Competency Assessment Title: Strategic Analysis Total Number of Poi…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

See word

**files (2)**

– ## comp2assignmentinstructions.docx

– ## strcb581_v1_comp2_rubric.pdf

**## comp2assignmentinstructions.docx**

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric

Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Strategic Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Step 1: Choose a Company

In the first Competency Assessment, you completed a SWOT analysis on a successful company that demonstrated a sustainable competitive advantage in the

marketplace. Now you will shift your focus to look at a company that is failing or experiencing challenges in the area of financial performance.

Select and research a company that is having financial difficulties or is on the brink of bankruptcy. You may also choose to use your current employer or a

company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Review “How to Access a Company’s Annual Reports and SEC Filings” from Investopedia.

You can also access specific information about a variety of businesses in the University Library by searching the following databases:

• University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete

• University Library > How Do I > Company Information > Find Annual Reports > EDGAR (SEC Filings)

• University Library > Databases > P > Plunkett Research Online

Step 2: Write an Analysis

Conduct a strategic analysis of the company’s current financial operations. Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the

marketplace and increasing financial performance.

Write a 750- to 1000-word strategic analysis. When writing your analysis, complete the following:

• Evaluate the company’s current financial plan, including charts and/or graphs showing financial data from the struggling company and make

recommendations for improvement.

• Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance.

• Create a plan to implement the strategies you selected.

• Include at least 3 sources.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment / Performance Criteria Mastery 100%

1. Evaluation of the company’s current financial plan and recommendations for improvement (weight 30%) Comprehensively evaluated the company’s current financial plan from a creative and innovative perspective, included fully relevant charts and/or graphs of company’s financial data, and made a comprehensive, creative, and innovative connection between recommendations for improvement and company’s current financial state

2. 2. Strategies for achieving sustainable competitive advantage (weight 30%) Thoroughly evaluated strategies for achieving sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance from a creative and innovative perspective

3. 3. Plan to implement the selected strategies (weight 40%) Created a thorough, creative, and innovative plan to implement strategies

Assignment Instructions:

**Review the assessment via the Competency 2 – Overview and Assessment Information.**

**Make sure you have addressed all the parts of the grading rubric.**

NOTE: It is important to choose a struggling firm that is publicly traded and that is still in business (and not yet in bankruptcy) so that you will have access to their full financial statements (think annual 10-K reports). Choosing a firm that is higher up on the Fortune 500 list will help in finding professional research/SWOT reports on the company in our UOPX Library.

Note: To pass a Competency Assessment you must receive at least a Meets Expectations (ME). You can re-submit your Competency Assessment a maximum of 2 times. You will receive feedback for your Competency Assessment. Use that feedback to make improvements before revising and re-submitting. This is an opportunity to learn and build mastery.

**Additional Notes**:

This needs to pass ZERO GPT and plagiarism checks.
Need scholarly references and intext citations. Only 3 to 4 references.

For company use Saks Fifth Avenue united states.

Apa Format.

**## strcb581_v1_comp2_rubric.pdf**

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Strategic Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Step 1: Choose a Company

In the first Competency Assessment, you completed a SWOT analysis on a successful company that demonstrated a sustainable competitive advantage in the
marketplace. Now you will shift your focus to look at a company that is failing or experiencing challenges in the area of financial performance.

Select and research a company that is having financial difficulties or is on the brink of bankruptcy. You may also choose to use your current employer or a
company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Review “How to Access a Company’s Annual Reports and SEC Filings” from Investopedia.

You can also access specific information about a variety of businesses in the University Library by searching the following databases:

• University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete

• University Library > How Do I > Company Information > Find Annual Reports > EDGAR (SEC Filings)

• University Library > Databases > P > Plunkett Research Online

Step 2: Write an Analysis

Conduct a strategic analysis of the company’s current financial operations. Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the
marketplace and increasing financial performance.

Write a 750- to 1000-word strategic analysis. When writing your analysis, complete the following:

• Evaluate the company’s current financial plan, including charts and/or graphs showing financial data from the struggling company and make

recommendations for improvement.

• Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance.

• Create a plan to implement the strategies you selected.

• Include at least 3 sources.

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Rubric Page 2 of 2

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria
Mastery

100%
Meets Expectations

85%
Not Met

0%

1. Evaluation of the company’s
current financial plan and
recommendations for improvement

(weight 30%)

Comprehensively evaluated the
company’s current financial plan
from a creative and innovative
perspective, included fully relevant
charts and/or graphs of company’s
financial data, and made a
comprehensive, creative, and
innovative connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial
state

Partially evaluated the company’s
current financial plan, included
mostly relevant charts and/or
graphs of company’s financial data,
and made a partial connection
between recommendations for
improvement and company’s
current financial state

Narrowly evaluated the company’s
current financial plan, included some
relevant charts and/or graphs of
company’s financial data, and made a
narrow connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial state;
or did not evaluate the company’s
current financial plan, did not include
relevant charts or graphs of
company’s financial data, or did not
make a connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial state

2. Strategies for achieving sustainable
competitive advantage

(weight 30%)

Thoroughly evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance
from a creative and innovative
perspective

Somewhat evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance

Narrowly evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance or
did not evaluate strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance

3. Plan to implement the selected
strategies

(weight 40%)

Created a thorough, creative, and
innovative plan to implement
strategies

Created a thorough plan to
implement strategies

Created a narrow plan to implement
strategies or did not create a plan to
implement strategies

**## strcb581_v1_comp2_rubric.pdf**

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Strategic Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Step 1: Choose a Company

In the first Competency Assessment, you completed a SWOT analysis on a successful company that demonstrated a sustainable competitive advantage in the
marketplace. Now you will shift your focus to look at a company that is failing or experiencing challenges in the area of financial performance.

Select and research a company that is having financial difficulties or is on the brink of bankruptcy. You may also choose to use your current employer or a
company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Review “How to Access a Company’s Annual Reports and SEC Filings” from Investopedia.

You can also access specific information about a variety of businesses in the University Library by searching the following databases:

• University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete

• University Library > How Do I > Company Information > Find Annual Reports > EDGAR (SEC Filings)

• University Library > Databases > P > Plunkett Research Online

Step 2: Write an Analysis

Conduct a strategic analysis of the company’s current financial operations. Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the
marketplace and increasing financial performance.

Write a 750- to 1000-word strategic analysis. When writing your analysis, complete the following:

• Evaluate the company’s current financial plan, including charts and/or graphs showing financial data from the struggling company and make

recommendations for improvement.

• Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance.

• Create a plan to implement the strategies you selected.

• Include at least 3 sources.

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Rubric Page 2 of 2

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria
Mastery

100%
Meets Expectations

85%
Not Met

0%

1. Evaluation of the company’s
current financial plan and
recommendations for improvement

(weight 30%)

Comprehensively evaluated the
company’s current financial plan
from a creative and innovative
perspective, included fully relevant
charts and/or graphs of company’s
financial data, and made a
comprehensive, creative, and
innovative connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial
state

Partially evaluated the company’s
current financial plan, included
mostly relevant charts and/or
graphs of company’s financial data,
and made a partial connection
between recommendations for
improvement and company’s
current financial state

Narrowly evaluated the company’s
current financial plan, included some
relevant charts and/or graphs of
company’s financial data, and made a
narrow connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial state;
or did not evaluate the company’s
current financial plan, did not include
relevant charts or graphs of
company’s financial data, or did not
make a connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial state

2. Strategies for achieving sustainable
competitive advantage

(weight 30%)

Thoroughly evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance
from a creative and innovative
perspective

Somewhat evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance

Narrowly evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance or
did not evaluate strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance

3. Plan to implement the selected
strategies

(weight 40%)

Created a thorough, creative, and
innovative plan to implement
strategies

Created a thorough plan to
implement strategies

Created a narrow plan to implement
strategies or did not create a plan to
implement strategies

**## comp2assignmentinstructions.docx**

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric

Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Strategic Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Step 1: Choose a Company

In the first Competency Assessment, you completed a SWOT analysis on a successful company that demonstrated a sustainable competitive advantage in the

marketplace. Now you will shift your focus to look at a company that is failing or experiencing challenges in the area of financial performance.

Select and research a company that is having financial difficulties or is on the brink of bankruptcy. You may also choose to use your current employer or a

company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Review “How to Access a Company’s Annual Reports and SEC Filings” from Investopedia.

You can also access specific information about a variety of businesses in the University Library by searching the following databases:

• University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete

• University Library > How Do I > Company Information > Find Annual Reports > EDGAR (SEC Filings)

• University Library > Databases > P > Plunkett Research Online

Step 2: Write an Analysis

Conduct a strategic analysis of the company’s current financial operations. Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the

marketplace and increasing financial performance.

Write a 750- to 1000-word strategic analysis. When writing your analysis, complete the following:

• Evaluate the company’s current financial plan, including charts and/or graphs showing financial data from the struggling company and make

recommendations for improvement.

• Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance.

• Create a plan to implement the strategies you selected.

• Include at least 3 sources.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment / Performance Criteria Mastery 100%

1. Evaluation of the company’s current financial plan and recommendations for improvement (weight 30%) Comprehensively evaluated the company’s current financial plan from a creative and innovative perspective, included fully relevant charts and/or graphs of company’s financial data, and made a comprehensive, creative, and innovative connection between recommendations for improvement and company’s current financial state

2. 2. Strategies for achieving sustainable competitive advantage (weight 30%) Thoroughly evaluated strategies for achieving sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance from a creative and innovative perspective

3. 3. Plan to implement the selected strategies (weight 40%) Created a thorough, creative, and innovative plan to implement strategies

Assignment Instructions:

**Review the assessment via the Competency 2 – Overview and Assessment Information.**

**Make sure you have addressed all the parts of the grading rubric.**

NOTE: It is important to choose a struggling firm that is publicly traded and that is still in business (and not yet in bankruptcy) so that you will have access to their full financial statements (think annual 10-K reports). Choosing a firm that is higher up on the Fortune 500 list will help in finding professional research/SWOT reports on the company in our UOPX Library.

Note: To pass a Competency Assessment you must receive at least a Meets Expectations (ME). You can re-submit your Competency Assessment a maximum of 2 times. You will receive feedback for your Competency Assessment. Use that feedback to make improvements before revising and re-submitting. This is an opportunity to learn and build mastery.

**Additional Notes**:

This needs to pass ZERO GPT and plagiarism checks.
Need scholarly references and intext citations. Only 3 to 4 references.

For company use Saks Fifth Avenue united states.

Apa Format.

**## strcb581_v1_comp2_rubric.pdf**

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Strategic Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Step 1: Choose a Company

In the first Competency Assessment, you completed a SWOT analysis on a successful company that demonstrated a sustainable competitive advantage in the
marketplace. Now you will shift your focus to look at a company that is failing or experiencing challenges in the area of financial performance.

Select and research a company that is having financial difficulties or is on the brink of bankruptcy. You may also choose to use your current employer or a
company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Review “How to Access a Company’s Annual Reports and SEC Filings” from Investopedia.

You can also access specific information about a variety of businesses in the University Library by searching the following databases:

• University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete

• University Library > How Do I > Company Information > Find Annual Reports > EDGAR (SEC Filings)

• University Library > Databases > P > Plunkett Research Online

Step 2: Write an Analysis

Conduct a strategic analysis of the company’s current financial operations. Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the
marketplace and increasing financial performance.

Write a 750- to 1000-word strategic analysis. When writing your analysis, complete the following:

• Evaluate the company’s current financial plan, including charts and/or graphs showing financial data from the struggling company and make

recommendations for improvement.

• Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance.

• Create a plan to implement the strategies you selected.

• Include at least 3 sources.

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Rubric Page 2 of 2

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria
Mastery

100%
Meets Expectations

85%
Not Met

0%

1. Evaluation of the company’s
current financial plan and
recommendations for improvement

(weight 30%)

Comprehensively evaluated the
company’s current financial plan
from a creative and innovative
perspective, included fully relevant
charts and/or graphs of company’s
financial data, and made a
comprehensive, creative, and
innovative connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial
state

Partially evaluated the company’s
current financial plan, included
mostly relevant charts and/or
graphs of company’s financial data,
and made a partial connection
between recommendations for
improvement and company’s
current financial state

Narrowly evaluated the company’s
current financial plan, included some
relevant charts and/or graphs of
company’s financial data, and made a
narrow connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial state;
or did not evaluate the company’s
current financial plan, did not include
relevant charts or graphs of
company’s financial data, or did not
make a connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial state

2. Strategies for achieving sustainable
competitive advantage

(weight 30%)

Thoroughly evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance
from a creative and innovative
perspective

Somewhat evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance

Narrowly evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance or
did not evaluate strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance

3. Plan to implement the selected
strategies

(weight 40%)

Created a thorough, creative, and
innovative plan to implement
strategies

Created a thorough plan to
implement strategies

Created a narrow plan to implement
strategies or did not create a plan to
implement strategies

**## comp2assignmentinstructions.docx**

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric

Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Strategic Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Step 1: Choose a Company

In the first Competency Assessment, you completed a SWOT analysis on a successful company that demonstrated a sustainable competitive advantage in the

marketplace. Now you will shift your focus to look at a company that is failing or experiencing challenges in the area of financial performance.

Select and research a company that is having financial difficulties or is on the brink of bankruptcy. You may also choose to use your current employer or a

company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Review “How to Access a Company’s Annual Reports and SEC Filings” from Investopedia.

You can also access specific information about a variety of businesses in the University Library by searching the following databases:

• University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete

• University Library > How Do I > Company Information > Find Annual Reports > EDGAR (SEC Filings)

• University Library > Databases > P > Plunkett Research Online

Step 2: Write an Analysis

Conduct a strategic analysis of the company’s current financial operations. Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the

marketplace and increasing financial performance.

Write a 750- to 1000-word strategic analysis. When writing your analysis, complete the following:

• Evaluate the company’s current financial plan, including charts and/or graphs showing financial data from the struggling company and make

recommendations for improvement.

• Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance.

• Create a plan to implement the strategies you selected.

• Include at least 3 sources.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment / Performance Criteria Mastery 100%

1. Evaluation of the company’s current financial plan and recommendations for improvement (weight 30%) Comprehensively evaluated the company’s current financial plan from a creative and innovative perspective, included fully relevant charts and/or graphs of company’s financial data, and made a comprehensive, creative, and innovative connection between recommendations for improvement and company’s current financial state

2. 2. Strategies for achieving sustainable competitive advantage (weight 30%) Thoroughly evaluated strategies for achieving sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance from a creative and innovative perspective

3. 3. Plan to implement the selected strategies (weight 40%) Created a thorough, creative, and innovative plan to implement strategies

Assignment Instructions:

**Review the assessment via the Competency 2 – Overview and Assessment Information.**

**Make sure you have addressed all the parts of the grading rubric.**

NOTE: It is important to choose a struggling firm that is publicly traded and that is still in business (and not yet in bankruptcy) so that you will have access to their full financial statements (think annual 10-K reports). Choosing a firm that is higher up on the Fortune 500 list will help in finding professional research/SWOT reports on the company in our UOPX Library.

Note: To pass a Competency Assessment you must receive at least a Meets Expectations (ME). You can re-submit your Competency Assessment a maximum of 2 times. You will receive feedback for your Competency Assessment. Use that feedback to make improvements before revising and re-submitting. This is an opportunity to learn and build mastery.

**Additional Notes**:

This needs to pass ZERO GPT and plagiarism checks.
Need scholarly references and intext citations. Only 3 to 4 references.

For company use Saks Fifth Avenue united states.

Apa Format.

**## strcb581_v1_comp2_rubric.pdf**

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Strategic Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Step 1: Choose a Company

In the first Competency Assessment, you completed a SWOT analysis on a successful company that demonstrated a sustainable competitive advantage in the
marketplace. Now you will shift your focus to look at a company that is failing or experiencing challenges in the area of financial performance.

Select and research a company that is having financial difficulties or is on the brink of bankruptcy. You may also choose to use your current employer or a
company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Review “How to Access a Company’s Annual Reports and SEC Filings” from Investopedia.

You can also access specific information about a variety of businesses in the University Library by searching the following databases:

• University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete

• University Library > How Do I > Company Information > Find Annual Reports > EDGAR (SEC Filings)

• University Library > Databases > P > Plunkett Research Online

Step 2: Write an Analysis

Conduct a strategic analysis of the company’s current financial operations. Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the
marketplace and increasing financial performance.

Write a 750- to 1000-word strategic analysis. When writing your analysis, complete the following:

• Evaluate the company’s current financial plan, including charts and/or graphs showing financial data from the struggling company and make

recommendations for improvement.

• Determine strategies for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace and increasing financial performance.

• Create a plan to implement the strategies you selected.

• Include at least 3 sources.

STRCB/581 Competency 2 Rubric Page 2 of 2

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria
Mastery

100%
Meets Expectations

85%
Not Met

0%

1. Evaluation of the company’s
current financial plan and
recommendations for improvement

(weight 30%)

Comprehensively evaluated the
company’s current financial plan
from a creative and innovative
perspective, included fully relevant
charts and/or graphs of company’s
financial data, and made a
comprehensive, creative, and
innovative connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial
state

Partially evaluated the company’s
current financial plan, included
mostly relevant charts and/or
graphs of company’s financial data,
and made a partial connection
between recommendations for
improvement and company’s
current financial state

Narrowly evaluated the company’s
current financial plan, included some
relevant charts and/or graphs of
company’s financial data, and made a
narrow connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial state;
or did not evaluate the company’s
current financial plan, did not include
relevant charts or graphs of
company’s financial data, or did not
make a connection between
recommendations for improvement
and company’s current financial state

2. Strategies for achieving sustainable
competitive advantage

(weight 30%)

Thoroughly evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance
from a creative and innovative
perspective

Somewhat evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance

Narrowly evaluated strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance or
did not evaluate strategies for
achieving sustainable competitive
advantage in the marketplace and
increasing financial performance

3. Plan to implement the selected
strategies

(weight 40%)

Created a thorough, creative, and
innovative plan to implement
strategies

Created a thorough plan to
implement strategies

Created a narrow plan to implement
strategies or did not create a plan to
implement strategies

November 6, 2026
[Solved] Comp 1 STRCB/581: Strategic Planning And Implementation

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

See attached word **files (2)** – ## comp1assignmentinstructions.docx – ## strcb581_v1_comp1_rubric.pdf **## comp1assignmentinstructions.docx** STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation Competency Assessment Title: Modified SWOT Analysis Total …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

See attached word

**files (2)**

– ## comp1assignmentinstructions.docx

– ## strcb581_v1_comp1_rubric.pdf

**## comp1assignmentinstructions.docx**

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric

Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Modified SWOT Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Successful businesses regularly analyze their processes to ensure they’re operating as efficiently as possible and maintaining their competitive advantages.

Although you can assess a company in many ways, a common technique is the SWOT analysis. In this assignment, you’ll practice using SWOT analysis to better

understand the factors involved in making business decisions that promote a sustainable competitive advantage.

Note: You can view sample SWOT analyses by visiting the University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete: SWOT Analyses.

Select and research a company from the 2020 Fortune 500 list that demonstrates a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace. You may also choose

to use your current employer or a company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Evaluate the selected company’s sustainable competitive advantage using the SWOT analysis technique.

Write a 700- to 1000-word modified SWOT analysis that includes the following:

• An introduction with a detailed description of the company

• A SWOT analysis diagram that includes strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats

• An evaluation of how specific internal factors (strengths and/or weaknesses) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples

may include:

• Financial, physical, or human resources

• Access to natural resources, trademarks, patents, or copyrights

• Current processes (employee programs or software systems)

• An evaluation of how specific external factors (opportunities and/or threats) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples may

include:

• Market trends (new products or technology advancements)

• Economic trends (local and/or global)

• Demographics

• Regulations (political, environmental, or economic)

• A conclusion with an evaluation of how the company has retained its competitive advantage

Include in-text citations and a reference page with at least 2 sources. Note: You may include your textbook as 1 of the sources.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment / Performance Criteria Mastery 100%

1. Introduction and company description (weight 20%) The introduction thoroughly oriented the reader to the company’s history and presence in the marketplace and the company description thoroughly used detailed language to illustrate the company’s success and sustainable competitive advantage.

2. 2. SWOT analysis diagram (weight 10%) The diagram included all required components, was presented in a format that fully showcased the information clearly and left the viewer with no unanswered questions.

3. 3. Internal factors evaluation (weight 25%) The evaluation thoroughly supported the SWOT Analysis Diagram and provided thorough insight into the connections between the company’s internal factors and its sustainable competitive advantages from a creative and innovative perspective

4. 4. External factors evaluation (weight 25%) The evaluation thoroughly supported the SWOT Analysis Diagram and provided thorough insight into the connections between the company’s external factors and its sustainable competitive advantages from a creative and innovative perspective.

5. 5. Conclusion and competitive advantage evaluation (weight 20%) The conclusion thoroughly summarized the company’s history and presence in the marketplace without introducing any new information and provided a thorough evaluation for how the company has retained its competitive advantage over time from a creative and innovative perspective.

Assignment Instructions:

**Review** the assessment via the Competency 2 – Overview and Assessment Information.

· Make sure you have addressed all the parts of the
[**grading rubric**](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/MGTCB576v1/mgtcb576_v1_comp2_rubric.pdf).

**Additional Notes**:

This needs to pass ZERO GPT and plagiarism checks.
Need scholarly references and intext citations.

For company use Md Anderson Cancer Center located in Houston TX.

Apa Format.

**## strcb581_v1_comp1_rubric.pdf**

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Modified SWOT Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions
Successful businesses regularly analyze their processes to ensure they’re operating as efficiently as possible and maintaining their competitive advantages.
Although you can assess a company in many ways, a common technique is the SWOT analysis. In this assignment, you’ll practice using SWOT analysis to better
understand the factors involved in making business decisions that promote a sustainable competitive advantage.

Note: You can view sample SWOT analyses by visiting the University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete: SWOT Analyses.

Select and research a company from the 2020 Fortune 500 list that demonstrates a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace. You may also choose
to use your current employer or a company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Evaluate the selected company’s sustainable competitive advantage using the SWOT analysis technique.

Write a 700- to 1000-word modified SWOT analysis that includes the following:

• An introduction with a detailed description of the company
• A SWOT analysis diagram that includes strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
• An evaluation of how specific internal factors (strengths and/or weaknesses) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples

may include:
• Financial, physical, or human resources
• Access to natural resources, trademarks, patents, or copyrights
• Current processes (employee programs or software systems)
• An evaluation of how specific external factors (opportunities and/or threats) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples may

include:
• Market trends (new products or technology advancements)
• Economic trends (local and/or global)
• Demographics
• Regulations (political, environmental, or economic)
• A conclusion with an evaluation of how the company has retained its competitive advantage

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 2 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Include in-text citations and a reference page with at least 2 sources. Note: You may include your textbook as 1 of the sources.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 3 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery
100%

Meets Expectations
85%

Not Met
0%

1. Introduction and company
description
(weight 20%)

The introduction thoroughly oriented
the reader to the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace and
the company description thoroughly
used detailed language to illustrate
the company’s success and
sustainable competitive advantage.

The introduction mostly oriented the
reader to the company’s history and
presence in the marketplace and
the company description mostly
used detailed language to illustrate
the company’s success and
sustainable competitive advantage.

The introduction somewhat oriented
the reader to the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace, the
company description somewhat used
detailed language to illustrate the
company’s success and sustainable
competitive advantage, or introduction
and/or company description was not
included.

2. SWOT analysis diagram
(weight 10%)

The diagram included all required
components, was presented in a
format that fully showcased the
information clearly and left the
viewer with no unanswered
questions.

The diagram included most of the
required components, was
presented in a format that mostly
showcased the information clearly,
and the viewer was left with few
unanswered questions.

The diagram included some of the
required components, was presented
in a format that somewhat showcased
the information clearly, the viewer
was left with some unanswered
questions, or diagram was not
included.

3. Internal factors evaluation
(weight 25%)

The evaluation thoroughly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided thorough insight into the
connections between the company’s
internal factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages from a
creative and innovative perspective.

The evaluation thoroughly
supported the SWOT Analysis
Diagram and provided thorough
insight into the connections
between the company’s internal
factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages.

The evaluation somewhat supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided narrow insight into the
connections between the company’s
internal factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages, or evaluation
was not included.

4. External factors evaluation
(weight 25%)

The evaluation thoroughly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided thorough insight into the
connections between the company’s
external factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages from a
creative and innovative perspective.

The evaluation thoroughly
supported the SWOT Analysis
Diagram and provided thorough
insight into the connections
between the company’s external
factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages.

The evaluation narrowly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided narrow insight into the
connections between the company’s
external factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages or evaluation
was not included.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 4 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery
100%

Meets Expectations
85%

Not Met
0%

5. Conclusion and competitive
advantage evaluation
(weight 20%)

The conclusion thoroughly
summarized the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace
without introducing any new
information and provided a thorough
evaluation for how the company has
retained its competitive advantage
over time from a creative and
innovative perspective.

The conclusion thoroughly
summarized the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace
without introducing any new
information and provided a
thorough evaluation for how the
company has retained its
competitive advantage over time.

The conclusion narrowly summarized
the company’s history and presence
in the marketplace without
introducing any new information and
provided a narrow evaluation for how
the company has retained its
competitive advantage over time or
conclusion was not included.

– STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
– Assignment Directions
– Competency Assessment Rubric

**## strcb581_v1_comp1_rubric.pdf**

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Modified SWOT Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions
Successful businesses regularly analyze their processes to ensure they’re operating as efficiently as possible and maintaining their competitive advantages.
Although you can assess a company in many ways, a common technique is the SWOT analysis. In this assignment, you’ll practice using SWOT analysis to better
understand the factors involved in making business decisions that promote a sustainable competitive advantage.

Note: You can view sample SWOT analyses by visiting the University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete: SWOT Analyses.

Select and research a company from the 2020 Fortune 500 list that demonstrates a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace. You may also choose
to use your current employer or a company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Evaluate the selected company’s sustainable competitive advantage using the SWOT analysis technique.

Write a 700- to 1000-word modified SWOT analysis that includes the following:

• An introduction with a detailed description of the company
• A SWOT analysis diagram that includes strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
• An evaluation of how specific internal factors (strengths and/or weaknesses) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples

may include:
• Financial, physical, or human resources
• Access to natural resources, trademarks, patents, or copyrights
• Current processes (employee programs or software systems)
• An evaluation of how specific external factors (opportunities and/or threats) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples may

include:
• Market trends (new products or technology advancements)
• Economic trends (local and/or global)
• Demographics
• Regulations (political, environmental, or economic)
• A conclusion with an evaluation of how the company has retained its competitive advantage

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 2 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Include in-text citations and a reference page with at least 2 sources. Note: You may include your textbook as 1 of the sources.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 3 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery
100%

Meets Expectations
85%

Not Met
0%

1. Introduction and company
description
(weight 20%)

The introduction thoroughly oriented
the reader to the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace and
the company description thoroughly
used detailed language to illustrate
the company’s success and
sustainable competitive advantage.

The introduction mostly oriented the
reader to the company’s history and
presence in the marketplace and
the company description mostly
used detailed language to illustrate
the company’s success and
sustainable competitive advantage.

The introduction somewhat oriented
the reader to the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace, the
company description somewhat used
detailed language to illustrate the
company’s success and sustainable
competitive advantage, or introduction
and/or company description was not
included.

2. SWOT analysis diagram
(weight 10%)

The diagram included all required
components, was presented in a
format that fully showcased the
information clearly and left the
viewer with no unanswered
questions.

The diagram included most of the
required components, was
presented in a format that mostly
showcased the information clearly,
and the viewer was left with few
unanswered questions.

The diagram included some of the
required components, was presented
in a format that somewhat showcased
the information clearly, the viewer
was left with some unanswered
questions, or diagram was not
included.

3. Internal factors evaluation
(weight 25%)

The evaluation thoroughly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided thorough insight into the
connections between the company’s
internal factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages from a
creative and innovative perspective.

The evaluation thoroughly
supported the SWOT Analysis
Diagram and provided thorough
insight into the connections
between the company’s internal
factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages.

The evaluation somewhat supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided narrow insight into the
connections between the company’s
internal factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages, or evaluation
was not included.

4. External factors evaluation
(weight 25%)

The evaluation thoroughly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided thorough insight into the
connections between the company’s
external factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages from a
creative and innovative perspective.

The evaluation thoroughly
supported the SWOT Analysis
Diagram and provided thorough
insight into the connections
between the company’s external
factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages.

The evaluation narrowly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided narrow insight into the
connections between the company’s
external factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages or evaluation
was not included.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 4 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery
100%

Meets Expectations
85%

Not Met
0%

5. Conclusion and competitive
advantage evaluation
(weight 20%)

The conclusion thoroughly
summarized the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace
without introducing any new
information and provided a thorough
evaluation for how the company has
retained its competitive advantage
over time from a creative and
innovative perspective.

The conclusion thoroughly
summarized the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace
without introducing any new
information and provided a
thorough evaluation for how the
company has retained its
competitive advantage over time.

The conclusion narrowly summarized
the company’s history and presence
in the marketplace without
introducing any new information and
provided a narrow evaluation for how
the company has retained its
competitive advantage over time or
conclusion was not included.

– STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
– Assignment Directions
– Competency Assessment Rubric

**## comp1assignmentinstructions.docx**

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric

Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Modified SWOT Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Successful businesses regularly analyze their processes to ensure they’re operating as efficiently as possible and maintaining their competitive advantages.

Although you can assess a company in many ways, a common technique is the SWOT analysis. In this assignment, you’ll practice using SWOT analysis to better

understand the factors involved in making business decisions that promote a sustainable competitive advantage.

Note: You can view sample SWOT analyses by visiting the University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete: SWOT Analyses.

Select and research a company from the 2020 Fortune 500 list that demonstrates a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace. You may also choose

to use your current employer or a company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Evaluate the selected company’s sustainable competitive advantage using the SWOT analysis technique.

Write a 700- to 1000-word modified SWOT analysis that includes the following:

• An introduction with a detailed description of the company

• A SWOT analysis diagram that includes strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats

• An evaluation of how specific internal factors (strengths and/or weaknesses) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples

may include:

• Financial, physical, or human resources

• Access to natural resources, trademarks, patents, or copyrights

• Current processes (employee programs or software systems)

• An evaluation of how specific external factors (opportunities and/or threats) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples may

include:

• Market trends (new products or technology advancements)

• Economic trends (local and/or global)

• Demographics

• Regulations (political, environmental, or economic)

• A conclusion with an evaluation of how the company has retained its competitive advantage

Include in-text citations and a reference page with at least 2 sources. Note: You may include your textbook as 1 of the sources.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment / Performance Criteria Mastery 100%

1. Introduction and company description (weight 20%) The introduction thoroughly oriented the reader to the company’s history and presence in the marketplace and the company description thoroughly used detailed language to illustrate the company’s success and sustainable competitive advantage.

2. 2. SWOT analysis diagram (weight 10%) The diagram included all required components, was presented in a format that fully showcased the information clearly and left the viewer with no unanswered questions.

3. 3. Internal factors evaluation (weight 25%) The evaluation thoroughly supported the SWOT Analysis Diagram and provided thorough insight into the connections between the company’s internal factors and its sustainable competitive advantages from a creative and innovative perspective

4. 4. External factors evaluation (weight 25%) The evaluation thoroughly supported the SWOT Analysis Diagram and provided thorough insight into the connections between the company’s external factors and its sustainable competitive advantages from a creative and innovative perspective.

5. 5. Conclusion and competitive advantage evaluation (weight 20%) The conclusion thoroughly summarized the company’s history and presence in the marketplace without introducing any new information and provided a thorough evaluation for how the company has retained its competitive advantage over time from a creative and innovative perspective.

Assignment Instructions:

**Review** the assessment via the Competency 2 – Overview and Assessment Information.

· Make sure you have addressed all the parts of the
[**grading rubric**](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/MGTCB576v1/mgtcb576_v1_comp2_rubric.pdf).

**Additional Notes**:

This needs to pass ZERO GPT and plagiarism checks.
Need scholarly references and intext citations.

For company use Md Anderson Cancer Center located in Houston TX.

Apa Format.

**## strcb581_v1_comp1_rubric.pdf**

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Modified SWOT Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions
Successful businesses regularly analyze their processes to ensure they’re operating as efficiently as possible and maintaining their competitive advantages.
Although you can assess a company in many ways, a common technique is the SWOT analysis. In this assignment, you’ll practice using SWOT analysis to better
understand the factors involved in making business decisions that promote a sustainable competitive advantage.

Note: You can view sample SWOT analyses by visiting the University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete: SWOT Analyses.

Select and research a company from the 2020 Fortune 500 list that demonstrates a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace. You may also choose
to use your current employer or a company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Evaluate the selected company’s sustainable competitive advantage using the SWOT analysis technique.

Write a 700- to 1000-word modified SWOT analysis that includes the following:

• An introduction with a detailed description of the company
• A SWOT analysis diagram that includes strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
• An evaluation of how specific internal factors (strengths and/or weaknesses) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples

may include:
• Financial, physical, or human resources
• Access to natural resources, trademarks, patents, or copyrights
• Current processes (employee programs or software systems)
• An evaluation of how specific external factors (opportunities and/or threats) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples may

include:
• Market trends (new products or technology advancements)
• Economic trends (local and/or global)
• Demographics
• Regulations (political, environmental, or economic)
• A conclusion with an evaluation of how the company has retained its competitive advantage

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 2 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Include in-text citations and a reference page with at least 2 sources. Note: You may include your textbook as 1 of the sources.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 3 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery
100%

Meets Expectations
85%

Not Met
0%

1. Introduction and company
description
(weight 20%)

The introduction thoroughly oriented
the reader to the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace and
the company description thoroughly
used detailed language to illustrate
the company’s success and
sustainable competitive advantage.

The introduction mostly oriented the
reader to the company’s history and
presence in the marketplace and
the company description mostly
used detailed language to illustrate
the company’s success and
sustainable competitive advantage.

The introduction somewhat oriented
the reader to the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace, the
company description somewhat used
detailed language to illustrate the
company’s success and sustainable
competitive advantage, or introduction
and/or company description was not
included.

2. SWOT analysis diagram
(weight 10%)

The diagram included all required
components, was presented in a
format that fully showcased the
information clearly and left the
viewer with no unanswered
questions.

The diagram included most of the
required components, was
presented in a format that mostly
showcased the information clearly,
and the viewer was left with few
unanswered questions.

The diagram included some of the
required components, was presented
in a format that somewhat showcased
the information clearly, the viewer
was left with some unanswered
questions, or diagram was not
included.

3. Internal factors evaluation
(weight 25%)

The evaluation thoroughly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided thorough insight into the
connections between the company’s
internal factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages from a
creative and innovative perspective.

The evaluation thoroughly
supported the SWOT Analysis
Diagram and provided thorough
insight into the connections
between the company’s internal
factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages.

The evaluation somewhat supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided narrow insight into the
connections between the company’s
internal factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages, or evaluation
was not included.

4. External factors evaluation
(weight 25%)

The evaluation thoroughly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided thorough insight into the
connections between the company’s
external factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages from a
creative and innovative perspective.

The evaluation thoroughly
supported the SWOT Analysis
Diagram and provided thorough
insight into the connections
between the company’s external
factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages.

The evaluation narrowly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided narrow insight into the
connections between the company’s
external factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages or evaluation
was not included.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 4 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery
100%

Meets Expectations
85%

Not Met
0%

5. Conclusion and competitive
advantage evaluation
(weight 20%)

The conclusion thoroughly
summarized the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace
without introducing any new
information and provided a thorough
evaluation for how the company has
retained its competitive advantage
over time from a creative and
innovative perspective.

The conclusion thoroughly
summarized the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace
without introducing any new
information and provided a
thorough evaluation for how the
company has retained its
competitive advantage over time.

The conclusion narrowly summarized
the company’s history and presence
in the marketplace without
introducing any new information and
provided a narrow evaluation for how
the company has retained its
competitive advantage over time or
conclusion was not included.

– STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
– Assignment Directions
– Competency Assessment Rubric

**## comp1assignmentinstructions.docx**

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric

Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Modified SWOT Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

Successful businesses regularly analyze their processes to ensure they’re operating as efficiently as possible and maintaining their competitive advantages.

Although you can assess a company in many ways, a common technique is the SWOT analysis. In this assignment, you’ll practice using SWOT analysis to better

understand the factors involved in making business decisions that promote a sustainable competitive advantage.

Note: You can view sample SWOT analyses by visiting the University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete: SWOT Analyses.

Select and research a company from the 2020 Fortune 500 list that demonstrates a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace. You may also choose

to use your current employer or a company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Evaluate the selected company’s sustainable competitive advantage using the SWOT analysis technique.

Write a 700- to 1000-word modified SWOT analysis that includes the following:

• An introduction with a detailed description of the company

• A SWOT analysis diagram that includes strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats

• An evaluation of how specific internal factors (strengths and/or weaknesses) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples

may include:

• Financial, physical, or human resources

• Access to natural resources, trademarks, patents, or copyrights

• Current processes (employee programs or software systems)

• An evaluation of how specific external factors (opportunities and/or threats) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples may

include:

• Market trends (new products or technology advancements)

• Economic trends (local and/or global)

• Demographics

• Regulations (political, environmental, or economic)

• A conclusion with an evaluation of how the company has retained its competitive advantage

Include in-text citations and a reference page with at least 2 sources. Note: You may include your textbook as 1 of the sources.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment / Performance Criteria Mastery 100%

1. Introduction and company description (weight 20%) The introduction thoroughly oriented the reader to the company’s history and presence in the marketplace and the company description thoroughly used detailed language to illustrate the company’s success and sustainable competitive advantage.

2. 2. SWOT analysis diagram (weight 10%) The diagram included all required components, was presented in a format that fully showcased the information clearly and left the viewer with no unanswered questions.

3. 3. Internal factors evaluation (weight 25%) The evaluation thoroughly supported the SWOT Analysis Diagram and provided thorough insight into the connections between the company’s internal factors and its sustainable competitive advantages from a creative and innovative perspective

4. 4. External factors evaluation (weight 25%) The evaluation thoroughly supported the SWOT Analysis Diagram and provided thorough insight into the connections between the company’s external factors and its sustainable competitive advantages from a creative and innovative perspective.

5. 5. Conclusion and competitive advantage evaluation (weight 20%) The conclusion thoroughly summarized the company’s history and presence in the marketplace without introducing any new information and provided a thorough evaluation for how the company has retained its competitive advantage over time from a creative and innovative perspective.

Assignment Instructions:

**Review** the assessment via the Competency 2 – Overview and Assessment Information.

· Make sure you have addressed all the parts of the
[**grading rubric**](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/MGTCB576v1/mgtcb576_v1_comp2_rubric.pdf).

**Additional Notes**:

This needs to pass ZERO GPT and plagiarism checks.
Need scholarly references and intext citations.

For company use Md Anderson Cancer Center located in Houston TX.

Apa Format.

**## strcb581_v1_comp1_rubric.pdf**

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Strategic Planning & Implementation

Competency Assessment Title: Modified SWOT Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions
Successful businesses regularly analyze their processes to ensure they’re operating as efficiently as possible and maintaining their competitive advantages.
Although you can assess a company in many ways, a common technique is the SWOT analysis. In this assignment, you’ll practice using SWOT analysis to better
understand the factors involved in making business decisions that promote a sustainable competitive advantage.

Note: You can view sample SWOT analyses by visiting the University Library > Databases > B > Business Source Complete: SWOT Analyses.

Select and research a company from the 2020 Fortune 500 list that demonstrates a sustainable competitive advantage in the marketplace. You may also choose
to use your current employer or a company you've worked for in the past as long as you have sufficient data to complete the assignment.

Evaluate the selected company’s sustainable competitive advantage using the SWOT analysis technique.

Write a 700- to 1000-word modified SWOT analysis that includes the following:

• An introduction with a detailed description of the company
• A SWOT analysis diagram that includes strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
• An evaluation of how specific internal factors (strengths and/or weaknesses) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples

may include:
• Financial, physical, or human resources
• Access to natural resources, trademarks, patents, or copyrights
• Current processes (employee programs or software systems)
• An evaluation of how specific external factors (opportunities and/or threats) support and/or promote a sustainable competitive advantage. Examples may

include:
• Market trends (new products or technology advancements)
• Economic trends (local and/or global)
• Demographics
• Regulations (political, environmental, or economic)
• A conclusion with an evaluation of how the company has retained its competitive advantage

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 2 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Include in-text citations and a reference page with at least 2 sources. Note: You may include your textbook as 1 of the sources.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 3 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery
100%

Meets Expectations
85%

Not Met
0%

1. Introduction and company
description
(weight 20%)

The introduction thoroughly oriented
the reader to the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace and
the company description thoroughly
used detailed language to illustrate
the company’s success and
sustainable competitive advantage.

The introduction mostly oriented the
reader to the company’s history and
presence in the marketplace and
the company description mostly
used detailed language to illustrate
the company’s success and
sustainable competitive advantage.

The introduction somewhat oriented
the reader to the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace, the
company description somewhat used
detailed language to illustrate the
company’s success and sustainable
competitive advantage, or introduction
and/or company description was not
included.

2. SWOT analysis diagram
(weight 10%)

The diagram included all required
components, was presented in a
format that fully showcased the
information clearly and left the
viewer with no unanswered
questions.

The diagram included most of the
required components, was
presented in a format that mostly
showcased the information clearly,
and the viewer was left with few
unanswered questions.

The diagram included some of the
required components, was presented
in a format that somewhat showcased
the information clearly, the viewer
was left with some unanswered
questions, or diagram was not
included.

3. Internal factors evaluation
(weight 25%)

The evaluation thoroughly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided thorough insight into the
connections between the company’s
internal factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages from a
creative and innovative perspective.

The evaluation thoroughly
supported the SWOT Analysis
Diagram and provided thorough
insight into the connections
between the company’s internal
factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages.

The evaluation somewhat supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided narrow insight into the
connections between the company’s
internal factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages, or evaluation
was not included.

4. External factors evaluation
(weight 25%)

The evaluation thoroughly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided thorough insight into the
connections between the company’s
external factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages from a
creative and innovative perspective.

The evaluation thoroughly
supported the SWOT Analysis
Diagram and provided thorough
insight into the connections
between the company’s external
factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages.

The evaluation narrowly supported
the SWOT Analysis Diagram and
provided narrow insight into the
connections between the company’s
external factors and its sustainable
competitive advantages or evaluation
was not included.

STRCB/581 Competency 1 Rubric Page 4 of 4

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Assignment/Performance Criteria Mastery
100%

Meets Expectations
85%

Not Met
0%

5. Conclusion and competitive
advantage evaluation
(weight 20%)

The conclusion thoroughly
summarized the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace
without introducing any new
information and provided a thorough
evaluation for how the company has
retained its competitive advantage
over time from a creative and
innovative perspective.

The conclusion thoroughly
summarized the company’s history
and presence in the marketplace
without introducing any new
information and provided a
thorough evaluation for how the
company has retained its
competitive advantage over time.

The conclusion narrowly summarized
the company’s history and presence
in the marketplace without
introducing any new information and
provided a narrow evaluation for how
the company has retained its
competitive advantage over time or
conclusion was not included.

– STRCB/581 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric
– Assignment Directions
– Competency Assessment Rubric

November 6, 2026