My Blog

Category: Psychology

  • [Solved] Introduction to Psychology Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Last Discussion: Week 6 -** For the last discussion board, I'm asking you to think of something you have learned in this course that has changed your way of seeing some aspect of human behavior or experience, and that you will see differently going forward. You may draw on any of the Modules we…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Last Discussion: Week 6 -**

    For the last discussion board, I'm asking you to think of something you have learned in this course that has changed your way of seeing some aspect of human behavior or experience, and that you will see differently going forward.   You may draw on any of the Modules we've covered, of course.   Be sure to be specific about what you've learned (e.g. general statements like "The brain is so amazing" or "Learning theory concepts are all around us"  will not do. )

  • [Solved] Historical Context for Freud’s Psychoanalysis Theory

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    all info in attachments. please read and follow all directions carefully. **files (2)** – ## PSY-802Rubric-HistoricalContextforFreudsPsychoanalysisTheory.pdf – Screenshot2026-04-09at9.41.30AM.png **## PSY-802Rubric-HistoricalContextforFreudsPsychoanalysisTheory.pdf** 4/9/26, 9:41 AM Page 1 of 1about…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    all info in attachments. please read and follow all directions carefully.

    **files (2)**

    – ## PSY-802Rubric-HistoricalContextforFreudsPsychoanalysisTheory.pdf

    – Screenshot2026-04-09at9.41.30AM.png

    **## PSY-802Rubric-HistoricalContextforFreudsPsychoanalysisTheory.pdf**

    4/9/26, 9:41 AM

    Page 1 of 1about:srcdoc

    Historical Context for Freud’s Psychoanalysis Theory – Rubric Total 250 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less Than
    Satisfactory

    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Historical Context 0 points

    The paper lacks a coherent

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis.

    55.5 points

    The paper provides a

    vague or incomplete

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis, with

    limited discussion of its

    history and development.

    59.25 points

    The paper offers a basic

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis, discussing

    its history and

    development to some

    extent.

    65.25 points

    The paper presents a clear

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis, thoroughly

    discussing its history and

    development.

    75 points

    The paper provides an

    outstanding historical

    context for psychoanalysis,

    offering a comprehensive

    discussion of its history

    and development.

    Analysis of Theories 0 points

    The analysis of

    psychoanalysis or

    psychodynamic theory is

    absent or unclear, with

    primary tenets and

    perspectives left

    unaddressed.

    55.5 points

    The analysis of

    psychoanalysis or

    psychodynamic theory is

    minimal or lacking in

    depth, with unclear

    discussion of primary

    tenets and perspectives.

    59.25 points

    The paper provides a basic

    analysis of psychoanalysis

    or psychodynamic theory,

    addressing primary tenets

    and perspectives with

    some clarity.

    65.25 points

    The paper offers a clear

    analysis of psychoanalysis

    or psychodynamic theory,

    addressing primary tenets

    and perspectives with

    depth and clarity.

    75 points

    The paper presents an

    exceptional analysis of

    psychoanalysis or

    psychodynamic theory,

    thoroughly addressing

    primary tenets and

    perspectives with depth,

    clarity, and critical insight.

    Rationale for Why

    Psychoanalysis is

    Considered Essential

    0 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is missing.

    55.5 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is provided, but it lacks

    clarity and depth.

    59.25 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is provided, but it lacks

    depth.

    65.25 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is well-supported and

    coherent.

    75 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is compelling, well-

    supported, and thoroughly

    explained.

    Mechanics of Writing

    Includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use

    0 points

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough that they

    impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate

    word choice or sentence

    construction is used.

    5.55 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice

    (register) or word choice

    are present. Sentence

    structure is correct, but not

    varied.

    5.93 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting

    to the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    6.53 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors,

    although a few may be

    present. The writer uses a

    variety of effective

    sentence structures and

    figures of speech.

    7.5 points

    Writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    Paper Format

    Includes use of appropriate

    style for the major and

    assignment

    0 points

    Template is not used

    appropriately or

    documentation format is

    rarely followed correctly.

    3.7 points

    Appropriate template is

    used, but some elements

    are missing or mistaken. A

    lack of control with

    formatting is apparent.

    3.95 points

    Appropriate template is

    used. Formatting is correct,

    although some minor

    errors may be present.

    4.35 points

    Appropriate template is

    fully used. There are

    virtually no errors in

    formatting style.

    5 points

    All format elements are

    correct.

    Documentation of

    Sources

    Includes citations,

    footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style

    0 points

    Sources are not

    documented.

    9.25 points

    Documentation of sources

    is inconsistent or incorrect,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style, with

    numerous formatting

    errors.

    9.88 points

    Sources are documented,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style,

    although some formatting

    errors may be present.

    10.88 points

    Sources are documented,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and

    format is mostly correct.

    12.5 points

    Sources are completely

    and correctly documented,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and

    format is free of errors.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **Screenshot2026-04-09at9.41.30AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-04-09at9-41-30am-png)

    **Screenshot2026-04-09at9.41.30AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-04-09at9-41-30am-png)

    **## PSY-802Rubric-HistoricalContextforFreudsPsychoanalysisTheory.pdf**

    4/9/26, 9:41 AM

    Page 1 of 1about:srcdoc

    Historical Context for Freud’s Psychoanalysis Theory – Rubric Total 250 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less Than
    Satisfactory

    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Historical Context 0 points

    The paper lacks a coherent

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis.

    55.5 points

    The paper provides a

    vague or incomplete

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis, with

    limited discussion of its

    history and development.

    59.25 points

    The paper offers a basic

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis, discussing

    its history and

    development to some

    extent.

    65.25 points

    The paper presents a clear

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis, thoroughly

    discussing its history and

    development.

    75 points

    The paper provides an

    outstanding historical

    context for psychoanalysis,

    offering a comprehensive

    discussion of its history

    and development.

    Analysis of Theories 0 points

    The analysis of

    psychoanalysis or

    psychodynamic theory is

    absent or unclear, with

    primary tenets and

    perspectives left

    unaddressed.

    55.5 points

    The analysis of

    psychoanalysis or

    psychodynamic theory is

    minimal or lacking in

    depth, with unclear

    discussion of primary

    tenets and perspectives.

    59.25 points

    The paper provides a basic

    analysis of psychoanalysis

    or psychodynamic theory,

    addressing primary tenets

    and perspectives with

    some clarity.

    65.25 points

    The paper offers a clear

    analysis of psychoanalysis

    or psychodynamic theory,

    addressing primary tenets

    and perspectives with

    depth and clarity.

    75 points

    The paper presents an

    exceptional analysis of

    psychoanalysis or

    psychodynamic theory,

    thoroughly addressing

    primary tenets and

    perspectives with depth,

    clarity, and critical insight.

    Rationale for Why

    Psychoanalysis is

    Considered Essential

    0 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is missing.

    55.5 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is provided, but it lacks

    clarity and depth.

    59.25 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is provided, but it lacks

    depth.

    65.25 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is well-supported and

    coherent.

    75 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is compelling, well-

    supported, and thoroughly

    explained.

    Mechanics of Writing

    Includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use

    0 points

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough that they

    impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate

    word choice or sentence

    construction is used.

    5.55 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice

    (register) or word choice

    are present. Sentence

    structure is correct, but not

    varied.

    5.93 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting

    to the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    6.53 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors,

    although a few may be

    present. The writer uses a

    variety of effective

    sentence structures and

    figures of speech.

    7.5 points

    Writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    Paper Format

    Includes use of appropriate

    style for the major and

    assignment

    0 points

    Template is not used

    appropriately or

    documentation format is

    rarely followed correctly.

    3.7 points

    Appropriate template is

    used, but some elements

    are missing or mistaken. A

    lack of control with

    formatting is apparent.

    3.95 points

    Appropriate template is

    used. Formatting is correct,

    although some minor

    errors may be present.

    4.35 points

    Appropriate template is

    fully used. There are

    virtually no errors in

    formatting style.

    5 points

    All format elements are

    correct.

    Documentation of

    Sources

    Includes citations,

    footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style

    0 points

    Sources are not

    documented.

    9.25 points

    Documentation of sources

    is inconsistent or incorrect,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style, with

    numerous formatting

    errors.

    9.88 points

    Sources are documented,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style,

    although some formatting

    errors may be present.

    10.88 points

    Sources are documented,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and

    format is mostly correct.

    12.5 points

    Sources are completely

    and correctly documented,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and

    format is free of errors.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **Screenshot2026-04-09at9.41.30AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-04-09at9-41-30am-png)

    **## PSY-802Rubric-HistoricalContextforFreudsPsychoanalysisTheory.pdf**

    4/9/26, 9:41 AM

    Page 1 of 1about:srcdoc

    Historical Context for Freud’s Psychoanalysis Theory – Rubric Total 250 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less Than
    Satisfactory

    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Historical Context 0 points

    The paper lacks a coherent

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis.

    55.5 points

    The paper provides a

    vague or incomplete

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis, with

    limited discussion of its

    history and development.

    59.25 points

    The paper offers a basic

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis, discussing

    its history and

    development to some

    extent.

    65.25 points

    The paper presents a clear

    historical context for

    psychoanalysis, thoroughly

    discussing its history and

    development.

    75 points

    The paper provides an

    outstanding historical

    context for psychoanalysis,

    offering a comprehensive

    discussion of its history

    and development.

    Analysis of Theories 0 points

    The analysis of

    psychoanalysis or

    psychodynamic theory is

    absent or unclear, with

    primary tenets and

    perspectives left

    unaddressed.

    55.5 points

    The analysis of

    psychoanalysis or

    psychodynamic theory is

    minimal or lacking in

    depth, with unclear

    discussion of primary

    tenets and perspectives.

    59.25 points

    The paper provides a basic

    analysis of psychoanalysis

    or psychodynamic theory,

    addressing primary tenets

    and perspectives with

    some clarity.

    65.25 points

    The paper offers a clear

    analysis of psychoanalysis

    or psychodynamic theory,

    addressing primary tenets

    and perspectives with

    depth and clarity.

    75 points

    The paper presents an

    exceptional analysis of

    psychoanalysis or

    psychodynamic theory,

    thoroughly addressing

    primary tenets and

    perspectives with depth,

    clarity, and critical insight.

    Rationale for Why

    Psychoanalysis is

    Considered Essential

    0 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is missing.

    55.5 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is provided, but it lacks

    clarity and depth.

    59.25 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is provided, but it lacks

    depth.

    65.25 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is well-supported and

    coherent.

    75 points

    The rationale for why

    psychoanalysis is

    considered essential to

    understanding human

    behavior and experiences

    is compelling, well-

    supported, and thoroughly

    explained.

    Mechanics of Writing

    Includes spelling,

    punctuation, grammar, and

    language use

    0 points

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough that they

    impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate

    word choice or sentence

    construction is used.

    5.55 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice

    (register) or word choice

    are present. Sentence

    structure is correct, but not

    varied.

    5.93 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting

    to the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    6.53 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors,

    although a few may be

    present. The writer uses a

    variety of effective

    sentence structures and

    figures of speech.

    7.5 points

    Writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    Paper Format

    Includes use of appropriate

    style for the major and

    assignment

    0 points

    Template is not used

    appropriately or

    documentation format is

    rarely followed correctly.

    3.7 points

    Appropriate template is

    used, but some elements

    are missing or mistaken. A

    lack of control with

    formatting is apparent.

    3.95 points

    Appropriate template is

    used. Formatting is correct,

    although some minor

    errors may be present.

    4.35 points

    Appropriate template is

    fully used. There are

    virtually no errors in

    formatting style.

    5 points

    All format elements are

    correct.

    Documentation of

    Sources

    Includes citations,

    footnotes, references,

    bibliography, etc., as

    appropriate to assignment

    and style

    0 points

    Sources are not

    documented.

    9.25 points

    Documentation of sources

    is inconsistent or incorrect,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style, with

    numerous formatting

    errors.

    9.88 points

    Sources are documented,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style,

    although some formatting

    errors may be present.

    10.88 points

    Sources are documented,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and

    format is mostly correct.

    12.5 points

    Sources are completely

    and correctly documented,

    as appropriate to

    assignment and style, and

    format is free of errors.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    [https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)

    **Screenshot2026-04-09at9.41.30AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-04-09at9-41-30am-png)

  • [Solved] Learning Theory

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attachment **files (1)** – ## LTmodule4Essay.docx **## LTmodule4Essay.docx** _Argumentative Essay_ After reading the module and the study references, each student will write an argumentative essay with their own words and criteria: 1. Explain convincingly and conclusively how Observational Lear…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attachment

    **files (1)**

    – ## LTmodule4Essay.docx

    **## LTmodule4Essay.docx**

    _Argumentative Essay_

    After reading the module and the study references, each student will write an argumentative essay with their own words and criteria:

    1. Explain convincingly and conclusively how Observational Learning Models can be used to improve social coexistence.

    2. Your essay must include a cover page, an introduction page, two development pages, a conclusion page, and a page for references. It should be in Times New Roman font, size 12, double-spaced.

    Contribute a minimum of 2 pages. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **## LTmodule4Essay.docx**

    _Argumentative Essay_

    After reading the module and the study references, each student will write an argumentative essay with their own words and criteria:

    1. Explain convincingly and conclusively how Observational Learning Models can be used to improve social coexistence.

    2. Your essay must include a cover page, an introduction page, two development pages, a conclusion page, and a page for references. It should be in Times New Roman font, size 12, double-spaced.

    Contribute a minimum of 2 pages. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

  • [Solved] topic 5 dq2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    apa style 300 words **files (1)** – ## Topic5DQ2Instructions.docx **## Topic5DQ2Instructions.docx** **Topic 5 DQ 2 (Obj. 5.1)** Assessment Description In relation to career development, counseling, and decision making, describe how reality therapy will assist you in practice. **## Topic5DQ2Instructi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    apa style

    300 words

    **files (1)**

    – ## Topic5DQ2Instructions.docx

    **## Topic5DQ2Instructions.docx**

    **Topic 5 DQ 2 (Obj. 5.1)**

    Assessment Description

    In relation to career development, counseling, and decision making, describe how reality therapy will assist you in practice.

    **## Topic5DQ2Instructions.docx**

    **Topic 5 DQ 2 (Obj. 5.1)**

    Assessment Description

    In relation to career development, counseling, and decision making, describe how reality therapy will assist you in practice.

  • [Solved] topic 5 dq 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    apa style 300 words **files (1)** – ## Topic5DQ1WithWeekLiterature.docx **## Topic5DQ1WithWeekLiterature.docx** Topic 5: Cognitive, Cognitive Behavioral And Reality Therapies Objectives: 1. Analyze cognitive, cognitive behavioral, and reality therapies in terms of the role of client and counselor, …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    apa style

    300 words

    **files (1)**

    – ## Topic5DQ1WithWeekLiterature.docx

    **## Topic5DQ1WithWeekLiterature.docx**

    Topic 5: Cognitive, Cognitive Behavioral And Reality Therapies

    Objectives:

    1. Analyze cognitive, cognitive behavioral, and reality therapies in terms of the role of client and counselor, goals of counseling, and types of counseling techniques employed.

    2. Describe counseling interventions for which cognitive, cognitive behavioral, and reality therapies have empirical evidence of their effectiveness.

    3. Analyze concepts reflected in cognitive, cognitive behavioral and reality therapies that are important in the development of a counselor.

    **Topic 5 DQ 1 (Obj. 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)**

    Assessment Description

    What are the benefits of using cognitive behavioral therapy versus using behavioral therapy?

    [https://research-ebsco-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/linkprocessor/plink?id=64ed0102-2f72-3698-8acf-10aac84e714c](https://research-ebsco-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/linkprocessor/plink?id=64ed0102-2f72-3698-8acf-10aac84e714c)

    [https://research-ebsco-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/linkprocessor/plink?id=3c2f7c3c-14b2-3cb6-b692-ff0da18230b3](https://research-ebsco-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/linkprocessor/plink?id=3c2f7c3c-14b2-3cb6-b692-ff0da18230b3)

    [https://psyctherapy-apa-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/Title/777700515-001](https://psyctherapy-apa-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/Title/777700515-001)

    **## Topic5DQ1WithWeekLiterature.docx**

    Topic 5: Cognitive, Cognitive Behavioral And Reality Therapies

    Objectives:

    1. Analyze cognitive, cognitive behavioral, and reality therapies in terms of the role of client and counselor, goals of counseling, and types of counseling techniques employed.

    2. Describe counseling interventions for which cognitive, cognitive behavioral, and reality therapies have empirical evidence of their effectiveness.

    3. Analyze concepts reflected in cognitive, cognitive behavioral and reality therapies that are important in the development of a counselor.

    **Topic 5 DQ 1 (Obj. 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)**

    Assessment Description

    What are the benefits of using cognitive behavioral therapy versus using behavioral therapy?

    [https://research-ebsco-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/linkprocessor/plink?id=64ed0102-2f72-3698-8acf-10aac84e714c](https://research-ebsco-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/linkprocessor/plink?id=64ed0102-2f72-3698-8acf-10aac84e714c)

    [https://research-ebsco-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/linkprocessor/plink?id=3c2f7c3c-14b2-3cb6-b692-ff0da18230b3](https://research-ebsco-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/linkprocessor/plink?id=3c2f7c3c-14b2-3cb6-b692-ff0da18230b3)

    [https://psyctherapy-apa-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/Title/777700515-001](https://psyctherapy-apa-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/Title/777700515-001)

  • [Solved] WEEK 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering WEEK 1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Discussion replies

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **175 words each** Post 1 Cancel culture is when a large group of individuals stop supporting someone because of something they said or did that others believe is wrong or offensive. An example of someone who was “canceled” is J.K. Rowling. She faced a lot of backlash after posting comments online a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **175 words each**

    Post 1

    Cancel culture is when a large group of individuals stop supporting someone because of something they said or did that others believe is wrong or offensive. An example of someone who was “canceled” is J.K. Rowling. She faced a lot of backlash after posting comments online about gender identity that many people felt were offensive to the transgender community. Because of this, fans and even some actors from the Harry Potter film series spoke out against her views. Some people chose to stop supporting her work, while others defended her and believed she was being unfairly criticized. This situation shows how quickly public opinion can change. Cancel culture can have both positive and negative effects. On the positive side, it can hold people accountable for what they say or do and bring attention to important social issues. It can also encourage people to think more carefully about their words. On the negative side, it can sometimes go too far. People may be judged too quickly, and there isn’t always room for forgiveness or learning from mistakes. Human emotions play a big role in cancel culture. People often feel angry, hurt, or disappointed, which can cause them to react quickly, especially online. (Pew Research Center, 2021) These strong emotions can lead to fast decisions without fully thinking things through.

    Reference

    Pew Research Center. (2021, May 19). _Americans and “cancel culture”: Where some see calls for  accountability, others see censorship, punishment_. [https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/05/19/americans-and-cancel-culture-where-some-see-calls-for-accountability-others-see-censorship-punishment/](https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/05/19/americans-and-cancel-culture-where-some-see-calls-for-accountability-others-see-censorship-punishment/)

    Post 2

    As a 52-year-old man, I grew up in a time when people could disagree, say something wrong, and still have a chance to explain themselves without it following them forever. Today, with social media being active around the clock, things move a lot faster. “Cancel culture” is often described as the public withdrawal of support from a person or organization after they say or do something that others find offensive or unacceptable. It usually plays out online, where large groups of people respond quickly by criticizing, boycotting, or calling for consequences (Ng, 2020).

    Human emotion plays a big role in this. Platforms like social media tend to amplify emotional reactions—especially anger, frustration, or disappointment. When people feel strongly about an issue, they may react quickly without taking time to fully understand the situation. Research shows that emotional responses, particularly outrage, spread rapidly online and can influence group behavior (Crockett, 2017). From my perspective, that explains why situations can escalate so quickly.

    There are both positive and negative sides to cancel culture. On the positive side, it can hold people and organizations accountable for harmful behavior. It gives a voice to individuals who may not have been heard in the past. On the negative side, it can sometimes go too far. People may be judged based on a single moment without context, and there is not always room for growth or forgiveness. This can damage reputations and careers in ways that are difficult to recover from.

    A well-known example is Kevin Hart, who stepped down from hosting the 2019 Oscars after past tweets resurfaced that many found offensive. While some felt accountability was necessary, others believed he had already grown and addressed those issues. Situations like this show how complicated cancel culture can be, especially when balancing accountability with the opportunity for change.

    **References**

    Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. _Nature Human Behaviour, 1_(11), 769–771.

    Ng, E. (2020). No grand pronouncements here: Reflections on cancel culture and digital media participation. _Television & New Media, 21_(6), 621–627.

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please up instructions and No AI or ChatGPT's . Please read and answer properly. Thanks **files (2)** – ## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf – ## Week3_Assignment11.pdf **## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf** WEEK 3: AT A GLANCE FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND THE C…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please up instructions and No AI or ChatGPT's . Please read and answer properly. Thanks

    **files (2)**

    – ## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf

    – ## Week3_Assignment11.pdf

    **## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf**

    WEEK 3: AT A GLANCE
    FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND THE COURT SYSTEM

    INTRODUCTION

    Two parents who love their three school-age children are divorcing. The mother is a highly
    compensated and successful business executive. The father, a stay-at-home dad, is involved
    extensively in all daily aspects of the children’s lives. A conviction for drug dealing, possession,
    and use during his third year at college has prevented him from securing well-paid employment.
    Both parents want full custody of their children. What factors should the courts consider in this
    matter? Should the children’s parental preferences be taken into account? Should they be
    allowed to testify in their own custody case?

    Consider a vastly different scenario. A 48-year-old high school basketball coach has been
    accused of sexually assaulting several of his former male basketball players. Although he has
    had no previous arrests, the actual assaults involved violent behavior, and victims reported that
    they had been threatened with physical harm if they reported any of the incidents to authorities.
    Should the coach be released after serving his sentence at a state penitentiary or be committed
    to a specialized state-run treatment center for sex offenders? A forensic psychologist may be
    asked to weigh in on these highly charged court cases.

    In civil cases (non-criminal cases), forensic psychologists play a variety of roles. Examples of
    their responsibilities include making custody recommendations and evaluating the "fitness" of

    DISCUSSION

    (https://w

    ASSIGNMENT

    (https://w

    RESOURCES

    (https://w

    (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/
    1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    each parent to raise a child. In criminal cases, a forensic psychologist may conduct a risk
    assessment of a convicted sex offender. The results of the assessment may be used to inform
    the court as to whether the offender should be indefinitely committed to a psychiatric or
    correctional facility or be released after serving his or her sentence.

    In the criminal justice system, it is imperative that defendants understand what is happening,
    from the moment of arrest to sentencing and punishment. Before a trial can even begin,
    defendants must be competent to stand trial—meaning that they understand and appreciate the
    nature of the charges against them, and they can assist their attorney in formulating a defense.
    Once competency is established, the defendant has several plea options, including guilty, not
    guilty, and not guilty by reason of insanity. Forensic psychologists are often called upon to
    determine a defendant’s competency when in question, and to provide the court an ultimate
    opinion regarding the defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense.

    This week, you examine relevant factors related to child testimony in child custody and child
    protection cases. You also evaluate risk assessment criteria in civil commitment cases for sex
    offenders. You also complete an Application Assignment that focuses on the issues of
    Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense.

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES
    Students will:

    Evaluate criteria concerning risk assessment in civil commitment cases for sex offenders (D)
    Evaluate the use of forensic psychology as it applies to child custody disputes and parental
    competence (D)
    Analyze the concepts of Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense as they relate to
    the trial process (A)

    **## Week3_Assignment11.pdf**

    Due Apr 26 by 10:59pm
    Points 120
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL AND THE
    INSANITY DEFENSE

    For this week’s Application, you analyze a case study and discuss if the insanity defense would be
    successful and if the defendant would be found competent to stand trial.

    To prepare:

    Review Chapters 8 and 10 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology, and focus on the issues
    surrounding competence to stand trial and the insanity defense. Also, consider criteria psychologists
    frequently use to determine whether a defendant is competent to stand trial or legally insane.
    Review the Week 3 Application Case Study provided in this week’s Learning Resources
    Search the Walden Library, and select one peer-reviewed article related to Competency to Stand Trial
    and one peer-reviewed article related to the Insanity Defense.

    The Assignment (3–5 pages):

    Identify the main factors that are relevant to a defendant’s competence to stand trial and use of the
    insanity defense.
    Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances under
    which the defendant in the case study might be found incompetent to stand trial.
    Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances that
    might warrant the insanity defense for the defendant.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    PSYC_2101_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric

    Discuss why or why not the insanity defense might be successful in the case study.

    Discuss why or why not the claim for incompetence to stand trial might be successful in this case.

    Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You
    are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this
    course.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    the main factors
    that are relevant to
    a defendant’s
    competence to
    stand trial and use
    of the insanity
    defense…. (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    circumstances
    under which the

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    defendant in the
    case study might
    be found
    incompetent to
    stand trial…. (20
    points)

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    circumstances that
    might warrant the
    insanity defense for
    the defendant….
    (20 points)

    20 pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the

    20 pts

    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    answer
    accurate?…Discuss
    why or why not the
    insanity defense
    might be
    successful in the
    case study…. (20
    points)

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Discuss
    why or why not the
    claim for
    incompetence to
    stand trial might be
    successful in this
    case…. (20 points)

    20 pts

    Quality of Writing …
    (15 points)

    15 pts

    when
    necessary.

    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    A
    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in
    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS).

    12 pts
    B
    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few
    MUGS errors.
    Writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and

    10.5 pts
    C
    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with
    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own

    9 pts
    D
    Writing is
    somewhat
    unclear and
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an overuse

    0 pts
    F
    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many
    MUGS
    errors.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Information
    documentation …(5
    points)

    5 pts

    Total Points: 120

    There is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    proper
    paraphrasing).

    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    of direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.

    There is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse
    of directly
    quoted
    content.

    5 pts
    A
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    properly
    documented
    with
    citation(s) and
    reference(s).

    3.5 pts
    B
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    documented
    with
    citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s).

    0 pts
    C
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    0 pts
    D

    0 pts
    F

    **## Week3_Assignment11.pdf**

    Due Apr 26 by 10:59pm
    Points 120
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL AND THE
    INSANITY DEFENSE

    For this week’s Application, you analyze a case study and discuss if the insanity defense would be
    successful and if the defendant would be found competent to stand trial.

    To prepare:

    Review Chapters 8 and 10 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology, and focus on the issues
    surrounding competence to stand trial and the insanity defense. Also, consider criteria psychologists
    frequently use to determine whether a defendant is competent to stand trial or legally insane.
    Review the Week 3 Application Case Study provided in this week’s Learning Resources
    Search the Walden Library, and select one peer-reviewed article related to Competency to Stand Trial
    and one peer-reviewed article related to the Insanity Defense.

    The Assignment (3–5 pages):

    Identify the main factors that are relevant to a defendant’s competence to stand trial and use of the
    insanity defense.
    Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances under
    which the defendant in the case study might be found incompetent to stand trial.
    Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances that
    might warrant the insanity defense for the defendant.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    PSYC_2101_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric

    Discuss why or why not the insanity defense might be successful in the case study.

    Discuss why or why not the claim for incompetence to stand trial might be successful in this case.

    Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You
    are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this
    course.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    the main factors
    that are relevant to
    a defendant’s
    competence to
    stand trial and use
    of the insanity
    defense…. (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    circumstances
    under which the

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    defendant in the
    case study might
    be found
    incompetent to
    stand trial…. (20
    points)

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    circumstances that
    might warrant the
    insanity defense for
    the defendant….
    (20 points)

    20 pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the

    20 pts

    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    answer
    accurate?…Discuss
    why or why not the
    insanity defense
    might be
    successful in the
    case study…. (20
    points)

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Discuss
    why or why not the
    claim for
    incompetence to
    stand trial might be
    successful in this
    case…. (20 points)

    20 pts

    Quality of Writing …
    (15 points)

    15 pts

    when
    necessary.

    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    A
    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in
    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS).

    12 pts
    B
    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few
    MUGS errors.
    Writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and

    10.5 pts
    C
    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with
    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own

    9 pts
    D
    Writing is
    somewhat
    unclear and
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an overuse

    0 pts
    F
    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many
    MUGS
    errors.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Information
    documentation …(5
    points)

    5 pts

    Total Points: 120

    There is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    proper
    paraphrasing).

    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    of direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.

    There is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse
    of directly
    quoted
    content.

    5 pts
    A
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    properly
    documented
    with
    citation(s) and
    reference(s).

    3.5 pts
    B
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    documented
    with
    citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s).

    0 pts
    C
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    0 pts
    D

    0 pts
    F

    **## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf**

    WEEK 3: AT A GLANCE
    FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND THE COURT SYSTEM

    INTRODUCTION

    Two parents who love their three school-age children are divorcing. The mother is a highly
    compensated and successful business executive. The father, a stay-at-home dad, is involved
    extensively in all daily aspects of the children’s lives. A conviction for drug dealing, possession,
    and use during his third year at college has prevented him from securing well-paid employment.
    Both parents want full custody of their children. What factors should the courts consider in this
    matter? Should the children’s parental preferences be taken into account? Should they be
    allowed to testify in their own custody case?

    Consider a vastly different scenario. A 48-year-old high school basketball coach has been
    accused of sexually assaulting several of his former male basketball players. Although he has
    had no previous arrests, the actual assaults involved violent behavior, and victims reported that
    they had been threatened with physical harm if they reported any of the incidents to authorities.
    Should the coach be released after serving his sentence at a state penitentiary or be committed
    to a specialized state-run treatment center for sex offenders? A forensic psychologist may be
    asked to weigh in on these highly charged court cases.

    In civil cases (non-criminal cases), forensic psychologists play a variety of roles. Examples of
    their responsibilities include making custody recommendations and evaluating the "fitness" of

    DISCUSSION

    (https://w

    ASSIGNMENT

    (https://w

    RESOURCES

    (https://w

    (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/
    1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    each parent to raise a child. In criminal cases, a forensic psychologist may conduct a risk
    assessment of a convicted sex offender. The results of the assessment may be used to inform
    the court as to whether the offender should be indefinitely committed to a psychiatric or
    correctional facility or be released after serving his or her sentence.

    In the criminal justice system, it is imperative that defendants understand what is happening,
    from the moment of arrest to sentencing and punishment. Before a trial can even begin,
    defendants must be competent to stand trial—meaning that they understand and appreciate the
    nature of the charges against them, and they can assist their attorney in formulating a defense.
    Once competency is established, the defendant has several plea options, including guilty, not
    guilty, and not guilty by reason of insanity. Forensic psychologists are often called upon to
    determine a defendant’s competency when in question, and to provide the court an ultimate
    opinion regarding the defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense.

    This week, you examine relevant factors related to child testimony in child custody and child
    protection cases. You also evaluate risk assessment criteria in civil commitment cases for sex
    offenders. You also complete an Application Assignment that focuses on the issues of
    Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense.

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES
    Students will:

    Evaluate criteria concerning risk assessment in civil commitment cases for sex offenders (D)
    Evaluate the use of forensic psychology as it applies to child custody disputes and parental
    competence (D)
    Analyze the concepts of Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense as they relate to
    the trial process (A)

    **## Week3_Assignment11.pdf**

    Due Apr 26 by 10:59pm
    Points 120
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL AND THE
    INSANITY DEFENSE

    For this week’s Application, you analyze a case study and discuss if the insanity defense would be
    successful and if the defendant would be found competent to stand trial.

    To prepare:

    Review Chapters 8 and 10 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology, and focus on the issues
    surrounding competence to stand trial and the insanity defense. Also, consider criteria psychologists
    frequently use to determine whether a defendant is competent to stand trial or legally insane.
    Review the Week 3 Application Case Study provided in this week’s Learning Resources
    Search the Walden Library, and select one peer-reviewed article related to Competency to Stand Trial
    and one peer-reviewed article related to the Insanity Defense.

    The Assignment (3–5 pages):

    Identify the main factors that are relevant to a defendant’s competence to stand trial and use of the
    insanity defense.
    Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances under
    which the defendant in the case study might be found incompetent to stand trial.
    Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances that
    might warrant the insanity defense for the defendant.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    PSYC_2101_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric

    Discuss why or why not the insanity defense might be successful in the case study.

    Discuss why or why not the claim for incompetence to stand trial might be successful in this case.

    Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You
    are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this
    course.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    the main factors
    that are relevant to
    a defendant’s
    competence to
    stand trial and use
    of the insanity
    defense…. (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    circumstances
    under which the

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    defendant in the
    case study might
    be found
    incompetent to
    stand trial…. (20
    points)

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    circumstances that
    might warrant the
    insanity defense for
    the defendant….
    (20 points)

    20 pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the

    20 pts

    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    answer
    accurate?…Discuss
    why or why not the
    insanity defense
    might be
    successful in the
    case study…. (20
    points)

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Discuss
    why or why not the
    claim for
    incompetence to
    stand trial might be
    successful in this
    case…. (20 points)

    20 pts

    Quality of Writing …
    (15 points)

    15 pts

    when
    necessary.

    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    A
    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in
    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS).

    12 pts
    B
    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few
    MUGS errors.
    Writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and

    10.5 pts
    C
    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with
    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own

    9 pts
    D
    Writing is
    somewhat
    unclear and
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an overuse

    0 pts
    F
    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many
    MUGS
    errors.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Information
    documentation …(5
    points)

    5 pts

    Total Points: 120

    There is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    proper
    paraphrasing).

    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    of direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.

    There is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse
    of directly
    quoted
    content.

    5 pts
    A
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    properly
    documented
    with
    citation(s) and
    reference(s).

    3.5 pts
    B
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    documented
    with
    citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s).

    0 pts
    C
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    0 pts
    D

    0 pts
    F

    **## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf**

    WEEK 3: AT A GLANCE
    FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND THE COURT SYSTEM

    INTRODUCTION

    Two parents who love their three school-age children are divorcing. The mother is a highly
    compensated and successful business executive. The father, a stay-at-home dad, is involved
    extensively in all daily aspects of the children’s lives. A conviction for drug dealing, possession,
    and use during his third year at college has prevented him from securing well-paid employment.
    Both parents want full custody of their children. What factors should the courts consider in this
    matter? Should the children’s parental preferences be taken into account? Should they be
    allowed to testify in their own custody case?

    Consider a vastly different scenario. A 48-year-old high school basketball coach has been
    accused of sexually assaulting several of his former male basketball players. Although he has
    had no previous arrests, the actual assaults involved violent behavior, and victims reported that
    they had been threatened with physical harm if they reported any of the incidents to authorities.
    Should the coach be released after serving his sentence at a state penitentiary or be committed
    to a specialized state-run treatment center for sex offenders? A forensic psychologist may be
    asked to weigh in on these highly charged court cases.

    In civil cases (non-criminal cases), forensic psychologists play a variety of roles. Examples of
    their responsibilities include making custody recommendations and evaluating the "fitness" of

    DISCUSSION

    (https://w

    ASSIGNMENT

    (https://w

    RESOURCES

    (https://w

    (https://cdn-
    media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/
    1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    [https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)

    each parent to raise a child. In criminal cases, a forensic psychologist may conduct a risk
    assessment of a convicted sex offender. The results of the assessment may be used to inform
    the court as to whether the offender should be indefinitely committed to a psychiatric or
    correctional facility or be released after serving his or her sentence.

    In the criminal justice system, it is imperative that defendants understand what is happening,
    from the moment of arrest to sentencing and punishment. Before a trial can even begin,
    defendants must be competent to stand trial—meaning that they understand and appreciate the
    nature of the charges against them, and they can assist their attorney in formulating a defense.
    Once competency is established, the defendant has several plea options, including guilty, not
    guilty, and not guilty by reason of insanity. Forensic psychologists are often called upon to
    determine a defendant’s competency when in question, and to provide the court an ultimate
    opinion regarding the defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense.

    This week, you examine relevant factors related to child testimony in child custody and child
    protection cases. You also evaluate risk assessment criteria in civil commitment cases for sex
    offenders. You also complete an Application Assignment that focuses on the issues of
    Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense.

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES
    Students will:

    Evaluate criteria concerning risk assessment in civil commitment cases for sex offenders (D)
    Evaluate the use of forensic psychology as it applies to child custody disputes and parental
    competence (D)
    Analyze the concepts of Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense as they relate to
    the trial process (A)

    **## Week3_Assignment11.pdf**

    Due Apr 26 by 10:59pm
    Points 120
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL AND THE
    INSANITY DEFENSE

    For this week’s Application, you analyze a case study and discuss if the insanity defense would be
    successful and if the defendant would be found competent to stand trial.

    To prepare:

    Review Chapters 8 and 10 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology, and focus on the issues
    surrounding competence to stand trial and the insanity defense. Also, consider criteria psychologists
    frequently use to determine whether a defendant is competent to stand trial or legally insane.
    Review the Week 3 Application Case Study provided in this week’s Learning Resources
    Search the Walden Library, and select one peer-reviewed article related to Competency to Stand Trial
    and one peer-reviewed article related to the Insanity Defense.

    The Assignment (3–5 pages):

    Identify the main factors that are relevant to a defendant’s competence to stand trial and use of the
    insanity defense.
    Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances under
    which the defendant in the case study might be found incompetent to stand trial.
    Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances that
    might warrant the insanity defense for the defendant.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)

    PSYC_2101_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric

    Discuss why or why not the insanity defense might be successful in the case study.

    Discuss why or why not the claim for incompetence to stand trial might be successful in this case.

    Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You
    are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this
    course.

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
    draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    the main factors
    that are relevant to
    a defendant’s
    competence to
    stand trial and use
    of the insanity
    defense…. (20
    points)

    20 pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    circumstances
    under which the

    20 pts

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D

    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A

    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B

    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C

    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning

    0 pts
    F

    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    defendant in the
    case study might
    be found
    incompetent to
    stand trial…. (20
    points)

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Identify
    circumstances that
    might warrant the
    insanity defense for
    the defendant….
    (20 points)

    20 pts

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the

    20 pts

    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    answer
    accurate?…Discuss
    why or why not the
    insanity defense
    might be
    successful in the
    case study…. (20
    points)

    Demonstration of
    Knowledge. Did the
    student fully
    respond to each
    Assignment
    prompt? Do the
    responses
    demonstrate that
    the student applied
    and learned the
    information or
    skills? Is the
    answer
    accurate?…Discuss
    why or why not the
    claim for
    incompetence to
    stand trial might be
    successful in this
    case…. (20 points)

    20 pts

    Quality of Writing …
    (15 points)

    15 pts

    when
    necessary.

    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    20 pts
    A
    Response is
    complete and
    accurate;
    contains
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    17 pts
    B
    Response is
    complete and
    mostly
    accurate;
    contains
    some details
    and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    C
    Response is
    somewhat
    complete
    and/or is
    somewhat
    inaccurate;
    and/or does
    not contain
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    includes
    some
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    13 pts
    D
    Response is
    incomplete or
    is mostly
    inaccurate;
    lacks
    sufficient
    details and/or
    explanation;
    does not
    include
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    0 pts
    F
    Response is
    incomplete;
    answers are
    inaccurate
    and/or not
    explained; no
    supporting
    information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources
    when
    necessary.

    15 pts
    A
    Writing is clear
    and organized
    with few or no
    errors in
    mechanics,
    usage,
    grammar, or
    spelling
    (MUGS).

    12 pts
    B
    Writing is
    mostly clear
    and organized
    with few
    MUGS errors.
    Writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and

    10.5 pts
    C
    Writing is
    somewhat
    clear and
    organized with
    some MUGS
    errors. Most
    writing is
    original (i.e.,
    use of own

    9 pts
    D
    Writing is
    somewhat
    unclear and
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many MUGS
    errors. There
    is an overuse

    0 pts
    F
    Writing is
    unclear
    and/or
    disorganized
    and/or
    contains
    many
    MUGS
    errors.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Information
    documentation …(5
    points)

    5 pts

    Total Points: 120

    There is a
    preponderance
    of original
    writing (i.e.,
    use of own
    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    proper
    paraphrasing).

    words and
    proper
    paraphrasing).

    of direct
    quotations
    and/or
    ineffective
    paraphrasing.

    There is an
    underuse of
    original
    writing and
    an overuse
    of directly
    quoted
    content.

    5 pts
    A
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    properly
    documented
    with
    citation(s) and
    reference(s).

    3.5 pts
    B
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    partially
    documented
    with
    citation(s)
    and/or
    reference(s).

    0 pts
    C
    Information
    from the
    Learning
    Resources is
    not cited or
    referenced in
    any way.

    0 pts
    D

    0 pts
    F

  • [Solved] 300 word discussion sexuality

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Due 4/15 5 pm EST Sexual Dysfunction Refer to your course materials and outside scholarly resources to support your responses. Select two of the sexual dysfunctions. Learn section and discuss assessment and treatment recommendations for them. Also, discuss the role of sociocultural issues that may c…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Due 4/15 5 pm EST

    Sexual Dysfunction

    Refer to your course materials and outside scholarly resources to support your responses. Select two of the sexual dysfunctions. Learn section and discuss assessment and treatment recommendations for them. Also, discuss the role of sociocultural issues that may contribute to these dysfunctions.

  • [Solved] topic 5 chart

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    apa style **files (3)** – ## Topic5ChartInstructions.docx – ## Topic5CNL-500-RS-T5-CognitiveCognitiveBehavioralRationalEmotiveBehaviorTherapyandRealityTherapyComparisonComparisonChartBlank.docx – Topic5CNL-500-RS-CaseStudyAnalysis-2.docx **## Topic5ChartInstructions.docx** **Cognitive, Cognitive Beh…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    apa style

    **files (3)**

    – ## Topic5ChartInstructions.docx

    – ## Topic5CNL-500-RS-T5-CognitiveCognitiveBehavioralRationalEmotiveBehaviorTherapyandRealityTherapyComparisonComparisonChartBlank.docx

    – Topic5CNL-500-RS-CaseStudyAnalysis-2.docx

    **## Topic5ChartInstructions.docx**

    **Cognitive, Cognitive Behavioral, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Reality Therapy Comparison Chart (Obj. 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)**

    Assessment Traits

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    The purpose of this assignment is to compare and contrast the core principles of Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavioral Theory Therapy, and Reality Therapy. By completing the Theory Comparison Worksheet, you will gain a deeper understanding of the foundational concepts, key contributors, and therapeutic applications of each theoretical approach. The goal is to evaluate how these cognitive focused theories inform contemporary counseling practice and contribute to the development of an integrated theoretical perspective.

    Read the “Case Study Analysis” document and select one of the six case studies.

    Use three to four scholarly sources to complete the attached “Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Reality Therapy Comparison Chart” document.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **## Topic5CNL-500-RS-T5-CognitiveCognitiveBehavioralRationalEmotiveBehaviorTherapyandRealityTherapyComparisonComparisonChartBlank.docx**

    ![A black text on a white background AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/topic-5-chart)

    **CNL-500 Topic 5: Cognitive, Cognitive Behavioral, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Reality Therapy Comparison Worksheet**

    **Directions:** Access the attached Case Study Analysis resource. Select one of the case studies to apply to this assignment. Then, complete the chart below. Complete the specific fields listed in the chart for each theory. All sections will require a 50-75-word description except for the section where you list the three treatment interventions. Include three to four scholarly resources and in-text citation as appropriate. Include a full APA reference for the resources used below.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Cognitive Therapy** | **Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)** | **Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT)** | **Reality Therapy (RT)** |
    | **Roles of the Counselor and Client(s) (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **Describe the state of dysfunction**<br>**How would you describe the problem from each theoretical orientation? (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **Strategies for Change**<br>**How is change accomplished? (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **List Three Treatment Interventions** | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: |
    | **Important Ethical Considerations (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **Using clinical judgment, how would this theory help the family in your scenario establish a new homeostasis? (50-75 words each)** | | | | |

    References

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.png

    **Topic5CNL-500-RS-CaseStudyAnalysis-2.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic5cnl-500-rs-casestudyanalysis-2-docx)

    **Topic5CNL-500-RS-CaseStudyAnalysis-2.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic5cnl-500-rs-casestudyanalysis-2-docx)

    **## Topic5ChartInstructions.docx**

    **Cognitive, Cognitive Behavioral, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Reality Therapy Comparison Chart (Obj. 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)**

    Assessment Traits

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    The purpose of this assignment is to compare and contrast the core principles of Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavioral Theory Therapy, and Reality Therapy. By completing the Theory Comparison Worksheet, you will gain a deeper understanding of the foundational concepts, key contributors, and therapeutic applications of each theoretical approach. The goal is to evaluate how these cognitive focused theories inform contemporary counseling practice and contribute to the development of an integrated theoretical perspective.

    Read the “Case Study Analysis” document and select one of the six case studies.

    Use three to four scholarly sources to complete the attached “Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Reality Therapy Comparison Chart” document.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **## Topic5CNL-500-RS-T5-CognitiveCognitiveBehavioralRationalEmotiveBehaviorTherapyandRealityTherapyComparisonComparisonChartBlank.docx**

    ![A black text on a white background AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/topic-5-chart)

    **CNL-500 Topic 5: Cognitive, Cognitive Behavioral, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Reality Therapy Comparison Worksheet**

    **Directions:** Access the attached Case Study Analysis resource. Select one of the case studies to apply to this assignment. Then, complete the chart below. Complete the specific fields listed in the chart for each theory. All sections will require a 50-75-word description except for the section where you list the three treatment interventions. Include three to four scholarly resources and in-text citation as appropriate. Include a full APA reference for the resources used below.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Cognitive Therapy** | **Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)** | **Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT)** | **Reality Therapy (RT)** |
    | **Roles of the Counselor and Client(s) (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **Describe the state of dysfunction**<br>**How would you describe the problem from each theoretical orientation? (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **Strategies for Change**<br>**How is change accomplished? (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **List Three Treatment Interventions** | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: |
    | **Important Ethical Considerations (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **Using clinical judgment, how would this theory help the family in your scenario establish a new homeostasis? (50-75 words each)** | | | | |

    References

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.png

    **Topic5CNL-500-RS-CaseStudyAnalysis-2.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic5cnl-500-rs-casestudyanalysis-2-docx)

    **## Topic5ChartInstructions.docx**

    **Cognitive, Cognitive Behavioral, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Reality Therapy Comparison Chart (Obj. 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)**

    Assessment Traits

    Requires Lopeswrite

    Assessment Description

    The purpose of this assignment is to compare and contrast the core principles of Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavioral Theory Therapy, and Reality Therapy. By completing the Theory Comparison Worksheet, you will gain a deeper understanding of the foundational concepts, key contributors, and therapeutic applications of each theoretical approach. The goal is to evaluate how these cognitive focused theories inform contemporary counseling practice and contribute to the development of an integrated theoretical perspective.

    Read the “Case Study Analysis” document and select one of the six case studies.

    Use three to four scholarly sources to complete the attached “Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Reality Therapy Comparison Chart” document.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    **## Topic5CNL-500-RS-T5-CognitiveCognitiveBehavioralRationalEmotiveBehaviorTherapyandRealityTherapyComparisonComparisonChartBlank.docx**

    ![A black text on a white background AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/topic-5-chart)

    **CNL-500 Topic 5: Cognitive, Cognitive Behavioral, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Reality Therapy Comparison Worksheet**

    **Directions:** Access the attached Case Study Analysis resource. Select one of the case studies to apply to this assignment. Then, complete the chart below. Complete the specific fields listed in the chart for each theory. All sections will require a 50-75-word description except for the section where you list the three treatment interventions. Include three to four scholarly resources and in-text citation as appropriate. Include a full APA reference for the resources used below.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Cognitive Therapy** | **Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)** | **Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT)** | **Reality Therapy (RT)** |
    | **Roles of the Counselor and Client(s) (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **Describe the state of dysfunction**<br>**How would you describe the problem from each theoretical orientation? (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **Strategies for Change**<br>**How is change accomplished? (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **List Three Treatment Interventions** | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: | Intervention 1:<br>Intervention 2:<br>Intervention 3: |
    | **Important Ethical Considerations (50-75 words each)** | | | | |
    | **Using clinical judgment, how would this theory help the family in your scenario establish a new homeostasis? (50-75 words each)** | | | | |

    References

    © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.png

    **Topic5CNL-500-RS-CaseStudyAnalysis-2.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic5cnl-500-rs-casestudyanalysis-2-docx)