Assignment Prompt & Instructions
All info are in the attachments. Please read carefully and follwoing all directions.
**files (2)**
– ## RubricEvolutionofFreudianTheoryandtheEmergenceofNeo-FreudianTheory.pdf
– Screenshot2026-04-21at11.16.58AM.png
**## RubricEvolutionofFreudianTheoryandtheEmergenceofNeo-FreudianTheory.pdf**
4/21/26, 11:20 AM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Evolution of Freudian Theory and the Emergence of Neo-Freudian Theory – Rubric
Total 250
points
Criterion
1. 1:
Unsatisfactory
2. 2: Less Than
Satisfactory
3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
First Ten Years of
Freudian Theory
0 points
Lacks clear or accurate
discussion of the history
and initial concepts of
Freudian theory. Some key
concepts are missing or
incorrectly explained.
49.28 points
Basic discussion with some
inaccuracies. Key concepts
are mentioned but not well-
explained or detailed.
55.35 points
Explains the main historical
concepts, though some
elements may lack depth or
clarity. More detailed
explanation of major
concepts needed.
61.43 points
Provides a clear and
accurate history of
Freudian theory’s first 10
years; discusses key
concepts in a detailed
manner with minor gaps.
67.5 points
Exceptionally clear,
detailed, and accurate
discussion of the history
and key concepts in
Freudian theory’s first 10
years, demonstrating a
thorough understanding.
Psycho-Sexual
Development and
Emergence of Neo-
Freudian Theories
0 points
Fails to discuss psycho-
sexual development or the
emergence of neo-Freudian
theories. Concepts are
either misunderstood or
missing entirely.
49.28 points
Mentions psycho-sexual
development and neo-
Freudian theories but
explanations are unclear,
incomplete, or incorrect.
55.35 points
Provides a basic overview
of psycho-sexual
development and
emergence of Neo-Freudian
theories. Some details are
vague or lack connections.
61.43 points
Discusses psycho-sexual
development and neo-
Freudian theories with
sufficient detail and
accuracy, with minor areas
needing further
elaboration.
67.5 points
Thoroughly discusses
psycho-sexual development
and emergence of neo-
Freudian theories with
detailed examples and
clarity, showing a
comprehensive
understanding.
Alignment or Contrast of
Freudian Theory with
Culture and Christian
Worldview
0 points
Does not address how
Freudian theory aligns or
contrasts with culture and
the Christian worldview.
The analysis is superficial or
absent.
47.45 points
Briefly addresses the
alignment or contrast but
lacks depth, clarity, or
coherence. The analysis is
general and not well-
supported by examples.
53.3 points
Provides a satisfactory
analysis of how Freudian
theory aligns or contrasts
with culture and the
Christian worldview. Some
points may be
underdeveloped.
59.15 points
Offers a detailed analysis
with clear examples of how
Freudian theory aligns or
contrasts with culture and
the Christian worldview.
Minor areas may lack
elaboration.
65 points
Presents an in-depth and
well-supported analysis
with thorough examples of
the alignment or contrast
of Freudian theory with
culture and the Christian
worldview, showing deep
critical thinking.
Thesis Development and
Purpose
Thesis Development and
Purpose
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible
overall purpose or
organizing claim.
18.25 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are insufficiently developed
and/or vague; purpose is
not clear.
20.5 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are apparent and
appropriate to purpose.
22.75 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are clear and forecast the
development of the paper.
They are descriptive and
reflective of the arguments
and appropriate to the
purpose.
25 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are clear and
comprehensive; the
essence of the paper is
contained within the thesis.
Mechanics of Writing
Mechanics of Writing
0 points
Mechanical errors are
pervasive enough that they
impede communication of
meaning. Inappropriate
word choice and/or
sentence construction are
used.
9.13 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract
the reader. Inconsistencies
in language choice
(register), sentence
structure, and/or word
choice are present.
10.25 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but are
not overly distracting to the
reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-
appropriate language are
used.
11.38 points
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors,
although a few may be
present. A variety of
sentence structures and
effective figures of speech
are used.
12.5 points
Writer is clearly in
command of standard,
written, academic English.
APA Format
APA Format
0 points
Required format is rarely
followed correctly. No
reference page is included.
No in-text citations are
used.
9.13 points
Required format elements
are missing or incorrect. A
lack of control with
formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present.
However, in-text citations
are inconsistently used.
10.25 points
Required format is
generally correct. However,
errors are present (e.g.,
font, cover page, margins,
and in-text citations).
Reference page is included
and lists sources used in
the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented
though some errors are
11.38 points
Required format is used,
but minor errors are
present (e.g., headings and
direct quotes). Reference
page is present and
includes all cited sources.
Documentation is
appropriate and citation
style is usually correct.
12.5 points
The document is correctly
formatted. In-text citations
and a reference page are
complete and correct. The
documentation of cited
sources is free of error.
4/21/26, 11:20 AM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
present.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**Screenshot2026-04-21at11.16.58AM.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-04-21at11-16-58am-png)
**Screenshot2026-04-21at11.16.58AM.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-04-21at11-16-58am-png)
**## RubricEvolutionofFreudianTheoryandtheEmergenceofNeo-FreudianTheory.pdf**
4/21/26, 11:20 AM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Evolution of Freudian Theory and the Emergence of Neo-Freudian Theory – Rubric
Total 250
points
Criterion
1. 1:
Unsatisfactory
2. 2: Less Than
Satisfactory
3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
First Ten Years of
Freudian Theory
0 points
Lacks clear or accurate
discussion of the history
and initial concepts of
Freudian theory. Some key
concepts are missing or
incorrectly explained.
49.28 points
Basic discussion with some
inaccuracies. Key concepts
are mentioned but not well-
explained or detailed.
55.35 points
Explains the main historical
concepts, though some
elements may lack depth or
clarity. More detailed
explanation of major
concepts needed.
61.43 points
Provides a clear and
accurate history of
Freudian theory’s first 10
years; discusses key
concepts in a detailed
manner with minor gaps.
67.5 points
Exceptionally clear,
detailed, and accurate
discussion of the history
and key concepts in
Freudian theory’s first 10
years, demonstrating a
thorough understanding.
Psycho-Sexual
Development and
Emergence of Neo-
Freudian Theories
0 points
Fails to discuss psycho-
sexual development or the
emergence of neo-Freudian
theories. Concepts are
either misunderstood or
missing entirely.
49.28 points
Mentions psycho-sexual
development and neo-
Freudian theories but
explanations are unclear,
incomplete, or incorrect.
55.35 points
Provides a basic overview
of psycho-sexual
development and
emergence of Neo-Freudian
theories. Some details are
vague or lack connections.
61.43 points
Discusses psycho-sexual
development and neo-
Freudian theories with
sufficient detail and
accuracy, with minor areas
needing further
elaboration.
67.5 points
Thoroughly discusses
psycho-sexual development
and emergence of neo-
Freudian theories with
detailed examples and
clarity, showing a
comprehensive
understanding.
Alignment or Contrast of
Freudian Theory with
Culture and Christian
Worldview
0 points
Does not address how
Freudian theory aligns or
contrasts with culture and
the Christian worldview.
The analysis is superficial or
absent.
47.45 points
Briefly addresses the
alignment or contrast but
lacks depth, clarity, or
coherence. The analysis is
general and not well-
supported by examples.
53.3 points
Provides a satisfactory
analysis of how Freudian
theory aligns or contrasts
with culture and the
Christian worldview. Some
points may be
underdeveloped.
59.15 points
Offers a detailed analysis
with clear examples of how
Freudian theory aligns or
contrasts with culture and
the Christian worldview.
Minor areas may lack
elaboration.
65 points
Presents an in-depth and
well-supported analysis
with thorough examples of
the alignment or contrast
of Freudian theory with
culture and the Christian
worldview, showing deep
critical thinking.
Thesis Development and
Purpose
Thesis Development and
Purpose
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible
overall purpose or
organizing claim.
18.25 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are insufficiently developed
and/or vague; purpose is
not clear.
20.5 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are apparent and
appropriate to purpose.
22.75 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are clear and forecast the
development of the paper.
They are descriptive and
reflective of the arguments
and appropriate to the
purpose.
25 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are clear and
comprehensive; the
essence of the paper is
contained within the thesis.
Mechanics of Writing
Mechanics of Writing
0 points
Mechanical errors are
pervasive enough that they
impede communication of
meaning. Inappropriate
word choice and/or
sentence construction are
used.
9.13 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract
the reader. Inconsistencies
in language choice
(register), sentence
structure, and/or word
choice are present.
10.25 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but are
not overly distracting to the
reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-
appropriate language are
used.
11.38 points
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors,
although a few may be
present. A variety of
sentence structures and
effective figures of speech
are used.
12.5 points
Writer is clearly in
command of standard,
written, academic English.
APA Format
APA Format
0 points
Required format is rarely
followed correctly. No
reference page is included.
No in-text citations are
used.
9.13 points
Required format elements
are missing or incorrect. A
lack of control with
formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present.
However, in-text citations
are inconsistently used.
10.25 points
Required format is
generally correct. However,
errors are present (e.g.,
font, cover page, margins,
and in-text citations).
Reference page is included
and lists sources used in
the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented
though some errors are
11.38 points
Required format is used,
but minor errors are
present (e.g., headings and
direct quotes). Reference
page is present and
includes all cited sources.
Documentation is
appropriate and citation
style is usually correct.
12.5 points
The document is correctly
formatted. In-text citations
and a reference page are
complete and correct. The
documentation of cited
sources is free of error.
4/21/26, 11:20 AM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
present.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**Screenshot2026-04-21at11.16.58AM.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-04-21at11-16-58am-png)
**## RubricEvolutionofFreudianTheoryandtheEmergenceofNeo-FreudianTheory.pdf**
4/21/26, 11:20 AM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Evolution of Freudian Theory and the Emergence of Neo-Freudian Theory – Rubric
Total 250
points
Criterion
1. 1:
Unsatisfactory
2. 2: Less Than
Satisfactory
3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
First Ten Years of
Freudian Theory
0 points
Lacks clear or accurate
discussion of the history
and initial concepts of
Freudian theory. Some key
concepts are missing or
incorrectly explained.
49.28 points
Basic discussion with some
inaccuracies. Key concepts
are mentioned but not well-
explained or detailed.
55.35 points
Explains the main historical
concepts, though some
elements may lack depth or
clarity. More detailed
explanation of major
concepts needed.
61.43 points
Provides a clear and
accurate history of
Freudian theory’s first 10
years; discusses key
concepts in a detailed
manner with minor gaps.
67.5 points
Exceptionally clear,
detailed, and accurate
discussion of the history
and key concepts in
Freudian theory’s first 10
years, demonstrating a
thorough understanding.
Psycho-Sexual
Development and
Emergence of Neo-
Freudian Theories
0 points
Fails to discuss psycho-
sexual development or the
emergence of neo-Freudian
theories. Concepts are
either misunderstood or
missing entirely.
49.28 points
Mentions psycho-sexual
development and neo-
Freudian theories but
explanations are unclear,
incomplete, or incorrect.
55.35 points
Provides a basic overview
of psycho-sexual
development and
emergence of Neo-Freudian
theories. Some details are
vague or lack connections.
61.43 points
Discusses psycho-sexual
development and neo-
Freudian theories with
sufficient detail and
accuracy, with minor areas
needing further
elaboration.
67.5 points
Thoroughly discusses
psycho-sexual development
and emergence of neo-
Freudian theories with
detailed examples and
clarity, showing a
comprehensive
understanding.
Alignment or Contrast of
Freudian Theory with
Culture and Christian
Worldview
0 points
Does not address how
Freudian theory aligns or
contrasts with culture and
the Christian worldview.
The analysis is superficial or
absent.
47.45 points
Briefly addresses the
alignment or contrast but
lacks depth, clarity, or
coherence. The analysis is
general and not well-
supported by examples.
53.3 points
Provides a satisfactory
analysis of how Freudian
theory aligns or contrasts
with culture and the
Christian worldview. Some
points may be
underdeveloped.
59.15 points
Offers a detailed analysis
with clear examples of how
Freudian theory aligns or
contrasts with culture and
the Christian worldview.
Minor areas may lack
elaboration.
65 points
Presents an in-depth and
well-supported analysis
with thorough examples of
the alignment or contrast
of Freudian theory with
culture and the Christian
worldview, showing deep
critical thinking.
Thesis Development and
Purpose
Thesis Development and
Purpose
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible
overall purpose or
organizing claim.
18.25 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are insufficiently developed
and/or vague; purpose is
not clear.
20.5 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are apparent and
appropriate to purpose.
22.75 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are clear and forecast the
development of the paper.
They are descriptive and
reflective of the arguments
and appropriate to the
purpose.
25 points
Thesis and/or main claim
are clear and
comprehensive; the
essence of the paper is
contained within the thesis.
Mechanics of Writing
Mechanics of Writing
0 points
Mechanical errors are
pervasive enough that they
impede communication of
meaning. Inappropriate
word choice and/or
sentence construction are
used.
9.13 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract
the reader. Inconsistencies
in language choice
(register), sentence
structure, and/or word
choice are present.
10.25 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but are
not overly distracting to the
reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-
appropriate language are
used.
11.38 points
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors,
although a few may be
present. A variety of
sentence structures and
effective figures of speech
are used.
12.5 points
Writer is clearly in
command of standard,
written, academic English.
APA Format
APA Format
0 points
Required format is rarely
followed correctly. No
reference page is included.
No in-text citations are
used.
9.13 points
Required format elements
are missing or incorrect. A
lack of control with
formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present.
However, in-text citations
are inconsistently used.
10.25 points
Required format is
generally correct. However,
errors are present (e.g.,
font, cover page, margins,
and in-text citations).
Reference page is included
and lists sources used in
the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented
though some errors are
11.38 points
Required format is used,
but minor errors are
present (e.g., headings and
direct quotes). Reference
page is present and
includes all cited sources.
Documentation is
appropriate and citation
style is usually correct.
12.5 points
The document is correctly
formatted. In-text citations
and a reference page are
complete and correct. The
documentation of cited
sources is free of error.
4/21/26, 11:20 AM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
present.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**Screenshot2026-04-21at11.16.58AM.png**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-04-21at11-16-58am-png)