Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] Proofreading

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Hello, I was wondering if anybody could help me with spelling, Ai and plagiarism check on a homework assignment. Thank you

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Hello,

    I was wondering if anybody could help me with spelling, Ai and plagiarism check on a homework assignment.

    Thank you

  • [Solved] nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Wk9Pharminstructions.docx **## Wk9Pharminstructions.docx** Welcome to week 9! This week we will apply pharmacology concepts to disorders associated with women and men’s health, such as hormone deficiencies, cancers, and other functional and structural abnormalities. Your Learning …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Wk9Pharminstructions.docx

    **## Wk9Pharminstructions.docx**

    Welcome to week 9! This week we will apply pharmacology concepts to disorders associated with women and men’s health, such as hormone deficiencies, cancers, and other functional and structural abnormalities. Your Learning Resources also include material on eye, ear, and skin disorders and pharmacologic treatment.

    When selecting drugs and determining dosages for patients, it is essential to consider individual patient factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. These patient factors include genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior (i.e., diet, nutrition, smoking, alcohol, illicit drug abuse), and/or pathophysiological changes due to disease.

    WEEK 9 ASSIGNMENT (covers weeks 9-11)

    Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9 (Sunday night, 11:59 pm ET).

    Case studies are a useful way for you to apply your knowledge of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of pharmacology to specific patient cases and health histories.

    For your week 9 assignment, evaluate drug treatment plans for patients with various disorders and justify drug therapy plans based on patient history and diagnosis.

    Directions: For each of the scenarios below, answer the questions using your required learning resources, Medscape, and clinical practice guidelines (ie AHA, ACC, ADA,

    GINA). When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route, frequency, # dispensed (days supply), refills, special instructions etc. Also state if you would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications (if applicable). Use at least 3 sources for each scenario and cite sources using APA format. LIST REFERENCES AFTER EACH SCENARIO.

    SCENARIO 1

    What are the errors in the following prescriptions (1 per prescription)? Rewrite each prescription correctly. What is each medication’s classification and mechanism of action (MOA)?

    · rivoraxaban 20 mg PO daily with evening meal #30 0RF

    · tamsulosin (Proscar) 0.4 mg po daily, 30 minutes after the same meal each day #30 2 RF

    · Bactrim DS (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim 875/125 mg) po twice daily for 7 days for UTI #14 0RF

    · cephalexin (Cefzil) 500 mg po QID x 7 days #28 0 RF

    · ciprofloxacin 0.3% otic solution for bacterial conjunctivitis; instill 1-2 drops into eye every 2 hours while awake for 2 days then 1-2 drops every 4 hours while awake for the next 5 days #1 bottle 0 RF

    SCENARIO 2

    FL is 48-year-old woman presenting with hot flashes related to menopause. Current medical conditions include hypertension and ADHD. She reports that stimulant medications caused significant insomnia and appetite suppression in the past. She is seeking a single medication that may help manage more than one of her conditions.

    Which of the following medications would be the most appropriate choice for this patient? WHY? What is the medication’s MOA and what would you monitor?

    A. estradiol 1 mg PO daily

    B. progesterone 200 mg PO at bedtime

    C. venlafaxine XR 75 mg PO daily

    D. clonidine 0.1 mg PO twice daily

    E. bupropion XL 150 mg PO daily

    SCENARIO 3

    TN is a 26-year-old female presenting with thick white, odorless vaginal discharge and itching for 2 days. She is sexually active and has had unprotected sex with a new male partner for the last month. Current medications include fluoxetine 20 mg po daily, valacyclovir 500 mg po daily, zolpidem 10 mg po qHS, Depo-Provera 150 mg IM q3 months. TN reports drinking kava several times a day. She is allergic to sulfa drugs. What medication would you prescribe for TN (include complete medication order)? What is a possible differential diagnosis? How long should she abstain from sexual activity? What patient education would you provide?

    SCENARIO 4

    GA (70 kg patient) is prescribed vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours. The pharmacy stocks vancomycin 1 g per 20 mL vials.

    1. How much vancomycin (mg) should be administered per dose?

    2. How many milliliters of vancomycin solution should be drawn up for each dose?

    3. If the infusion rate is 10 mg/min, how long will it take to administer one dose?

    4. A trough level is drawn 30 minutes before the 4th dose, and the result is 9 mcg/mL. Is the current dosing regimen appropriate based on the trough level? Would you increase, decrease, or leave the dose the same? Please include a complete medication order. What are risks associated with vancomycin therapy?

    5. Why is vancomycin usually given IV and not PO? How does this relate to bioavailability?

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the case study posted in “Announcements” by your Instructor for this Assignment

    · Review the information provided and answer questions posed in the case study

    · When recommending a medication, write out a complete prescription for the medication

    · Whenever possible, use clinical practice guidelines in developing your answers when possible

    · Include at least three references to support your answer and cite them in APA format.

    ·
    **NURS_6521_Week9_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6521_Week9_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |

    · Total Points: 100

    **## Wk9Pharminstructions.docx**

    Welcome to week 9! This week we will apply pharmacology concepts to disorders associated with women and men’s health, such as hormone deficiencies, cancers, and other functional and structural abnormalities. Your Learning Resources also include material on eye, ear, and skin disorders and pharmacologic treatment.

    When selecting drugs and determining dosages for patients, it is essential to consider individual patient factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. These patient factors include genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior (i.e., diet, nutrition, smoking, alcohol, illicit drug abuse), and/or pathophysiological changes due to disease.

    WEEK 9 ASSIGNMENT (covers weeks 9-11)

    Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9 (Sunday night, 11:59 pm ET).

    Case studies are a useful way for you to apply your knowledge of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of pharmacology to specific patient cases and health histories.

    For your week 9 assignment, evaluate drug treatment plans for patients with various disorders and justify drug therapy plans based on patient history and diagnosis.

    Directions: For each of the scenarios below, answer the questions using your required learning resources, Medscape, and clinical practice guidelines (ie AHA, ACC, ADA,

    GINA). When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route, frequency, # dispensed (days supply), refills, special instructions etc. Also state if you would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications (if applicable). Use at least 3 sources for each scenario and cite sources using APA format. LIST REFERENCES AFTER EACH SCENARIO.

    SCENARIO 1

    What are the errors in the following prescriptions (1 per prescription)? Rewrite each prescription correctly. What is each medication’s classification and mechanism of action (MOA)?

    · rivoraxaban 20 mg PO daily with evening meal #30 0RF

    · tamsulosin (Proscar) 0.4 mg po daily, 30 minutes after the same meal each day #30 2 RF

    · Bactrim DS (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim 875/125 mg) po twice daily for 7 days for UTI #14 0RF

    · cephalexin (Cefzil) 500 mg po QID x 7 days #28 0 RF

    · ciprofloxacin 0.3% otic solution for bacterial conjunctivitis; instill 1-2 drops into eye every 2 hours while awake for 2 days then 1-2 drops every 4 hours while awake for the next 5 days #1 bottle 0 RF

    SCENARIO 2

    FL is 48-year-old woman presenting with hot flashes related to menopause. Current medical conditions include hypertension and ADHD. She reports that stimulant medications caused significant insomnia and appetite suppression in the past. She is seeking a single medication that may help manage more than one of her conditions.

    Which of the following medications would be the most appropriate choice for this patient? WHY? What is the medication’s MOA and what would you monitor?

    A. estradiol 1 mg PO daily

    B. progesterone 200 mg PO at bedtime

    C. venlafaxine XR 75 mg PO daily

    D. clonidine 0.1 mg PO twice daily

    E. bupropion XL 150 mg PO daily

    SCENARIO 3

    TN is a 26-year-old female presenting with thick white, odorless vaginal discharge and itching for 2 days. She is sexually active and has had unprotected sex with a new male partner for the last month. Current medications include fluoxetine 20 mg po daily, valacyclovir 500 mg po daily, zolpidem 10 mg po qHS, Depo-Provera 150 mg IM q3 months. TN reports drinking kava several times a day. She is allergic to sulfa drugs. What medication would you prescribe for TN (include complete medication order)? What is a possible differential diagnosis? How long should she abstain from sexual activity? What patient education would you provide?

    SCENARIO 4

    GA (70 kg patient) is prescribed vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours. The pharmacy stocks vancomycin 1 g per 20 mL vials.

    1. How much vancomycin (mg) should be administered per dose?

    2. How many milliliters of vancomycin solution should be drawn up for each dose?

    3. If the infusion rate is 10 mg/min, how long will it take to administer one dose?

    4. A trough level is drawn 30 minutes before the 4th dose, and the result is 9 mcg/mL. Is the current dosing regimen appropriate based on the trough level? Would you increase, decrease, or leave the dose the same? Please include a complete medication order. What are risks associated with vancomycin therapy?

    5. Why is vancomycin usually given IV and not PO? How does this relate to bioavailability?

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the case study posted in “Announcements” by your Instructor for this Assignment

    · Review the information provided and answer questions posed in the case study

    · When recommending a medication, write out a complete prescription for the medication

    · Whenever possible, use clinical practice guidelines in developing your answers when possible

    · Include at least three references to support your answer and cite them in APA format.

    ·
    **NURS_6521_Week9_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | NURS_6521_Week9_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection. | **15 to >11.0 ptsExcellent** Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.<br> <br>**11 to >7.0 ptsGood** Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.<br> <br>**7 to >3.0 ptsFair** Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate. | **3 ptsComplete** Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate. | 3 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. | **4 ptsExcellent** References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.<br> <br>**3 ptsGood** References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsFair** References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 4 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **3 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**1 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 3 pts |

    · Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Presentation: Interest Groups

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Presentation-InterestGroups.docx **## Presentation-InterestGroups.docx** **_Presentation: Interest Groups_** _**_The goal of this assignment is to familiarize students with interest groups. Please follow the steps below to complete your assignment._**_ _1._ _**_Select an interest…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Presentation-InterestGroups.docx

    **## Presentation-InterestGroups.docx**

    **_Presentation: Interest Groups_**

    _**_The goal of this assignment is to familiarize students with interest groups. Please follow the steps below to complete your assignment._**_

    _1._
    _**_Select an interest group (AARP, AHIP, Coalition for Health Services Research, Emergency Nurses Association, Pharma)_**_

    _2._
    _**_Discuss how they are pushing their agenda (i.e., mechanisms used to influence policy makers), key obstacles, and spending (consult the Center for Responsible Politics, www.opensecrets.org)_**_

    _3._
    _**_Investigate the interest group’s website and review their position statements, testimony, and consult media reports to obtain more information on the group’s lobbying efforts._**_

    _**_Submission Instructions:_**_

    _·_
    _**_Presentation is original work and logically organized. Followed current APA format including citation of references._**_

    _·_
    _**_PowerPoint presentation with 5-8 slides were clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides._**_

    _·_
    _**_Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work._**_

    _·_
    _**_Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style._**_

    _**Grading Rubric**_

    _Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric._

    _**Presentation Rubric**_

    _| | | |_
    _| — | — | — |_
    _| Presentation Rubric |_
    _| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |_
    _| **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_
    _| **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_
    _| **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_
    _| **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_
    _| **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines**<br>view longer description | **Full Marks**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_

    **## Presentation-InterestGroups.docx**

    **_Presentation: Interest Groups_**

    _**_The goal of this assignment is to familiarize students with interest groups. Please follow the steps below to complete your assignment._**_

    _1._
    _**_Select an interest group (AARP, AHIP, Coalition for Health Services Research, Emergency Nurses Association, Pharma)_**_

    _2._
    _**_Discuss how they are pushing their agenda (i.e., mechanisms used to influence policy makers), key obstacles, and spending (consult the Center for Responsible Politics, www.opensecrets.org)_**_

    _3._
    _**_Investigate the interest group’s website and review their position statements, testimony, and consult media reports to obtain more information on the group’s lobbying efforts._**_

    _**_Submission Instructions:_**_

    _·_
    _**_Presentation is original work and logically organized. Followed current APA format including citation of references._**_

    _·_
    _**_PowerPoint presentation with 5-8 slides were clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides._**_

    _·_
    _**_Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work._**_

    _·_
    _**_Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style._**_

    _**Grading Rubric**_

    _Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric._

    _**Presentation Rubric**_

    _| | | |_
    _| — | — | — |_
    _| Presentation Rubric |_
    _| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |_
    _| **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_
    _| **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_
    _| **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_
    _| **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_
    _| **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines**<br>view longer description | **Full Marks**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**4 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**3 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**2 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<br>**1 pts**<br>**No Submission**<br>**0 pts** | /4 pts |_

  • [Solved] Policy Analysis P..

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## PolicyAnalysisPaper…docx **## PolicyAnalysisPaper…docx** **_Policy Analysis Paper_** This assignment is an analysis of local, state, or federal health policy. 1. Select a state health policy reform innovation 2. Discuss the rationale for the policy, how it was adopted (e.g.,…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## PolicyAnalysisPaper…docx

    **## PolicyAnalysisPaper…docx**

    **_Policy Analysis Paper_**

    This assignment is an analysis of local, state, or federal health policy.

    1. Select a state health policy reform innovation

    2. Discuss the rationale for the policy, how it was adopted (e.g., federal waivers, passage by state legislature), the funding structure, and (to the extent statistical data are available) its impact. ethical outcome based on evidence.

    3. Examples of state innovations include Maryland’s hospital rate setting, Vermont’s single payer system, and Massachusetts’ health reforms

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper is to be formatted per current APA style, 5-7 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Final Essay/Paper Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Final Essay/Paper Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues/problems.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues/problems.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines** | **Full Marks**<br>Demonstrates a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrates a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrates a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |

    **## PolicyAnalysisPaper…docx**

    **_Policy Analysis Paper_**

    This assignment is an analysis of local, state, or federal health policy.

    1. Select a state health policy reform innovation

    2. Discuss the rationale for the policy, how it was adopted (e.g., federal waivers, passage by state legislature), the funding structure, and (to the extent statistical data are available) its impact. ethical outcome based on evidence.

    3. Examples of state innovations include Maryland’s hospital rate setting, Vermont’s single payer system, and Massachusetts’ health reforms

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    · The paper is to be formatted per current APA style, 5-7 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    · Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

    · Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    **Final Essay/Paper Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Final Essay/Paper Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Points** |
    | **Identification of Main Issues/Problems** | **Distinguished**<br>Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues/problems.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues/problems.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms** | **Distinguished**<br>Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding** | **Distinguished**<br>Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Provides competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Provides competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature** | **Distinguished**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |
    | **Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines** | **Full Marks**<br>Demonstrates a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<br>**10 to >9 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Demonstrates a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**9 to >7 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Demonstrates a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br>**7 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was submitted.<br>**0 pts** | /10 pts |

  • [Solved] MARL SOAP 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    TOPIC: IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA Please see attached template to complete the SOAP NOTE – EACH SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL SENTENCES AS THE RUBRIC REQUIRE – NEED TO MEET EACH SECTION ACCORDINGLY TO THE RUBRIC ATTACHED TO RECEIVE FULL POINTS OR GOOD GRADE PLEASE -NEED TO BE ORIGINAL WITH NO MORE…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    TOPIC: IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA

    Please see attached template to complete the SOAP NOTE

    – EACH SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL SENTENCES AS THE RUBRIC REQUIRE

    – NEED TO MEET EACH SECTION ACCORDINGLY TO THE RUBRIC ATTACHED TO RECEIVE FULL POINTS  OR GOOD GRADE PLEASE

    -NEED TO BE ORIGINAL WITH NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT.

    – 3 REFERENCES WITH THE PAST 5 YEARS ( FROM 2022-2026)  WITH DOI #

    – NEED TO BE ORIGINAL WORKS

    – MUST COMPLY WITH RUBRIC OR WILL BE NEEDED UPDATES TILL MEET RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS PLEASE

    DUE DATE APRIL 22, 2026

    – [\
    \
    SOAPNoteTemplate-1-1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/soapnotetemplate-1-1-docx-10537571 "SOAPNoteTemplate-1-1.docx")
    – [\
    \
    SOAPNoteRubric-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/soapnoterubric-1-pdf-10537573 "SOAPNoteRubric-1.pdf")

  • [Solved] LAUREN SOAP 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    TOPIC: GERD Please see attached template to complete the SOAP NOTE – EACH SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL SENTENCES AS THE RUBRIC REQUIRE – NEED TO MEET EACH SECTION ACCORDINGLY TO THE RUBRIC ATTACHED TO RECEIVE FULL POINTS OR GOOD GRADE PLEASE -NEED TO BE ORIGINAL WITH NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARI…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    TOPIC: GERD

    Please see attached template to complete the SOAP NOTE

    – EACH SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL SENTENCES AS THE RUBRIC REQUIRE

    – NEED TO MEET EACH SECTION ACCORDINGLY TO THE RUBRIC ATTACHED TO RECEIVE FULL POINTS  OR GOOD GRADE PLEASE

    -NEED TO BE ORIGINAL WITH NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT.

    – 3 REFERENCES WITH THE PAST 5 YEARS ( FROM 2022-2026)  WITH DOI #

    – NEED TO BE ORIGINAL WORKS

    – MUST COMPLY WITH RUBRIC OR WILL BE NEEDED UPDATES TILL MEET RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS PLEASE

    DUE DATE APRIL 22, 2026

    – [\
    \
    SOAPNoteTemplate-1-1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/soapnotetemplate-1-1-docx-10537579 "SOAPNoteTemplate-1-1.docx")
    – [\
    \
    SOAPNoteRubric-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/soapnoterubric-1-pdf-10537581 "SOAPNoteRubric-1.pdf")

  • [Solved] Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with iron deficiency anemia states across the lifespan

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with iron deficiency anemia states across the lifespan

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with iron deficiency anemia states across the lifespan

  • [Solved] home work

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## DLV3.docx **## DLV3.docx** 2 **Competency** Differentiate the impact of various communication technologies on safety and quality improvement **Student Success Criteria** View the grading criteria by clicking on the deliverable link under the _Evaluation Criteria_ section below. **…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## DLV3.docx

    **## DLV3.docx**

    2

    **Competency**

    Differentiate the impact of various communication technologies on safety and quality improvement

    **Student Success Criteria**

    View the grading criteria by clicking on the deliverable link under the
    _Evaluation Criteria_ section below.

    **Scenario**

    You are a staff nurse voted as the nursing delegate to sit on the Emerging Innovations Steering Committee. In preparing for your first committee meeting, you have read through the last year of meeting minutes and determined what the past nursing delegate had achieved and what future goals were set for this specific role. The meeting minutes from last month show the steering committee is currently looking at emerging communication technologies and how the hospital can leverage integration of cost-effective healthcare technology. In preparation for the first meeting, you have created a list of best practices based on your scholarly research and created a list of action plans for leveraging these into practice. You have been tasked with creating a comparative analysis of two communication technologies and how they can be used to improve communication between healthcare teams and how it can influence patient outcomes. Before the next monthly committee meeting, they want you to send them a comparative analysis using a format of your choice (i.e. table) of two communication technologies that you feel best improve safety and quality healthcare.

    **Instructions**

    Write a comparative analysis table including the following:

    · Discuss the two selected communication technologies you have chosen with support from scholarly research

    · Describe the function of each technology

    · Analyze how it is used in the healthcare setting

    · Examine how the two selected technologies can be used to improve communication among the healthcare team.

    · Provide a specific practice example from the literature to support how each technology has been shown to improve communication among the healthcare team.

    · Discuss how each type of communication technology has been shown to improve patient outcomes underneath the table.

    · Identify evidence from the literature to support how each technology has been shown to impact patient outcomes.

    **## DLV3.docx**

    2

    **Competency**

    Differentiate the impact of various communication technologies on safety and quality improvement

    **Student Success Criteria**

    View the grading criteria by clicking on the deliverable link under the
    _Evaluation Criteria_ section below.

    **Scenario**

    You are a staff nurse voted as the nursing delegate to sit on the Emerging Innovations Steering Committee. In preparing for your first committee meeting, you have read through the last year of meeting minutes and determined what the past nursing delegate had achieved and what future goals were set for this specific role. The meeting minutes from last month show the steering committee is currently looking at emerging communication technologies and how the hospital can leverage integration of cost-effective healthcare technology. In preparation for the first meeting, you have created a list of best practices based on your scholarly research and created a list of action plans for leveraging these into practice. You have been tasked with creating a comparative analysis of two communication technologies and how they can be used to improve communication between healthcare teams and how it can influence patient outcomes. Before the next monthly committee meeting, they want you to send them a comparative analysis using a format of your choice (i.e. table) of two communication technologies that you feel best improve safety and quality healthcare.

    **Instructions**

    Write a comparative analysis table including the following:

    · Discuss the two selected communication technologies you have chosen with support from scholarly research

    · Describe the function of each technology

    · Analyze how it is used in the healthcare setting

    · Examine how the two selected technologies can be used to improve communication among the healthcare team.

    · Provide a specific practice example from the literature to support how each technology has been shown to improve communication among the healthcare team.

    · Discuss how each type of communication technology has been shown to improve patient outcomes underneath the table.

    · Identify evidence from the literature to support how each technology has been shown to impact patient outcomes.

  • [Solved] wk9

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## week9instruccmindmap.docx **## week9instruccmindmap.docx** **2. MINDMAP TOPICS:** · Generalized anxiety disorder · Depression · Bipolar disorders · Schizophrenia · Delirium and dementia · Obsessive compulsive disease **Review your learning resources:** · Rogers, J. (2023). _McCan…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## week9instruccmindmap.docx

    **## week9instruccmindmap.docx**

    **2. MINDMAP TOPICS:**

    · Generalized anxiety disorder

    · Depression

    · Bipolar disorders

    · Schizophrenia

    · Delirium and dementia

    · Obsessive compulsive disease

    **Review your learning resources:**

    · Rogers, J. (2023).
    _McCance & Huether's pathophysiology_(9th ed.). Elsevier – Evolve.

    · Chapter 19: Neurobiology of Schizophrenia, Mood Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    · McIntyre, R. S. & Calabrese, J. R. (2019).
    [Bipolar depression: The clinical characteristics and unmet needs of a complex disorderLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03007995.2019.1636017).
    _Current Medical Research and Opinion_, 1–14. doi:10.1080/03007995.2019.1636017. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03007995.2019.1636017

    Credit Line: Bipolar depression: The clinical characteristics and unmet needs of a complex disorder by McIntyre, R. S. & Calabrese, J. R., in Current Medical Research and Opinion. Copyright 2019 by Librapharm Ltd. Reprinted by permission of Librapharm Ltd via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Select one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap.<br>Describe the Pathophysiology and Etiology of the primary diagnosis. List risk factors related to the primary diagnosis. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** A thoroughly completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology at the cellular level and shows understanding of the primary diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly identifies etiology for the diagnosis and lists appropriate risk factors.<br> <br>**27 to >23.0 ptsGood** A completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology at the organ level of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify specific etiology for the diagnosis and some risk factors are not linked to diagnosis.<br> <br>**23 to >19.0 ptsFair** An inaccurately complete or vague MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies etiology for the diagnosis and all risk factors are not linked to diagnosis.<br> <br>**19 to >0 ptsPoor** An incomplete MindMap with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response does not describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify etiology for this diagnosis and risk factors are missing. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications? | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsGood** The response accurately describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat diagnostic tests or labs would you order to confirm the primary diagnosis? | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are appropriately linked within the Mind map.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsGood** The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis but are not appropriately linked within the Mind map.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are not linked within the Mind map.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsGood** The response accurately describes the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately describes potential referrals and medications.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes potential referrals and medications.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes possible referrals and medications, or is missing. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources and Mind map formatting/writing | **10 to >7.0 ptsExcellent** The response is articulate with demonstration of advanced terms and knowledge in writing style with no grammatical or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles that are within last 5 years. Research articles are also cited and linked within mind map.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsGood** The response is efficient with correct spelling and no gross grammatical and/or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles within last 5 years but not cited or linked within mind map.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsFair** The response is fair with a few spelling and grammatical errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles but not within last 5 years and not cited or linked within mind map.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is poor with gross grammatical and spelling errors. Did not use appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Did not include reference list with at least two research articles. | 10 pts |

    **## week9instruccmindmap.docx**

    **2. MINDMAP TOPICS:**

    · Generalized anxiety disorder

    · Depression

    · Bipolar disorders

    · Schizophrenia

    · Delirium and dementia

    · Obsessive compulsive disease

    **Review your learning resources:**

    · Rogers, J. (2023).
    _McCance & Huether's pathophysiology_(9th ed.). Elsevier – Evolve.

    · Chapter 19: Neurobiology of Schizophrenia, Mood Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    · McIntyre, R. S. & Calabrese, J. R. (2019).
    [Bipolar depression: The clinical characteristics and unmet needs of a complex disorderLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03007995.2019.1636017).
    _Current Medical Research and Opinion_, 1–14. doi:10.1080/03007995.2019.1636017. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03007995.2019.1636017

    Credit Line: Bipolar depression: The clinical characteristics and unmet needs of a complex disorder by McIntyre, R. S. & Calabrese, J. R., in Current Medical Research and Opinion. Copyright 2019 by Librapharm Ltd. Reprinted by permission of Librapharm Ltd via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Select one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap.<br>Describe the Pathophysiology and Etiology of the primary diagnosis. List risk factors related to the primary diagnosis. | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** A thoroughly completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology at the cellular level and shows understanding of the primary diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly identifies etiology for the diagnosis and lists appropriate risk factors.<br> <br>**27 to >23.0 ptsGood** A completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology at the organ level of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify specific etiology for the diagnosis and some risk factors are not linked to diagnosis.<br> <br>**23 to >19.0 ptsFair** An inaccurately complete or vague MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies etiology for the diagnosis and all risk factors are not linked to diagnosis.<br> <br>**19 to >0 ptsPoor** An incomplete MindMap with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response does not describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify etiology for this diagnosis and risk factors are missing. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications? | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsGood** The response accurately describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat diagnostic tests or labs would you order to confirm the primary diagnosis? | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are appropriately linked within the Mind map.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsGood** The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis but are not appropriately linked within the Mind map.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are not linked within the Mind map.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications.<br> <br>**17 to >14.0 ptsGood** The response accurately describes the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately describes potential referrals and medications.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsFair** The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes potential referrals and medications.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes possible referrals and medications, or is missing. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources and Mind map formatting/writing | **10 to >7.0 ptsExcellent** The response is articulate with demonstration of advanced terms and knowledge in writing style with no grammatical or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles that are within last 5 years. Research articles are also cited and linked within mind map.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsGood** The response is efficient with correct spelling and no gross grammatical and/or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles within last 5 years but not cited or linked within mind map.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsFair** The response is fair with a few spelling and grammatical errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles but not within last 5 years and not cited or linked within mind map.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsPoor** The response is poor with gross grammatical and spelling errors. Did not use appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Did not include reference list with at least two research articles. | 10 pts |

  • [Solved] WENDY SOAP 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    TOPIC: GOUT DISEASE Please see attached template to complete the SOAP NOTE – EACH SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL SENTENCES AS THE RUBRIC REQUIRE – NEED TO MEET EACH SECTION ACCORDINGLY TO THE RUBRIC ATTACHED TO RECEIVE FULL POINTS OR GOOD GRADE PLEASE -NEED TO BE ORIGINAL WITH NO MORE THAN 10% …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    TOPIC: GOUT DISEASE

    Please see attached template to complete the SOAP NOTE

    – EACH SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL SENTENCES AS THE RUBRIC REQUIRE

    – NEED TO MEET EACH SECTION ACCORDINGLY TO THE RUBRIC ATTACHED TO RECEIVE FULL POINTS  OR GOOD GRADE PLEASE

    -NEED TO BE ORIGINAL WITH NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT.

    – 3 REFERENCES WITH THE PAST 5 YEARS ( FROM 2022-2026)  WITH DOI #

    – NEED TO BE ORIGINAL WORKS

    – MUST COMPLY WITH RUBRIC OR WILL BE NEEDED UPDATES TILL MEET RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS PLEASE

    DUE DATE APRIL 22, 2026

    – [\
    \
    SOAPNoteTemplate-1-1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/soapnotetemplate-1-1-docx-10537575 "SOAPNoteTemplate-1-1.docx")
    – [\
    \
    SOAPNoteRubric-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/soapnoterubric-1-pdf-10537577 "SOAPNoteRubric-1.pdf")