Category: Education

  • [Solved] M3 WA#1: Venn Diagram

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## M3WA.docx – CognitiveDevelopmentinEarlyChildhoodCh7.docx **## M3WA.docx** M3 WA#1: Venn Diagram **Assignment: Comparing Cognitive Development Theories** **Objective:** To deepen your understanding of Piaget's Cognitive Developmental Theory and Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory by co…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## M3WA.docx

    – CognitiveDevelopmentinEarlyChildhoodCh7.docx

    **## M3WA.docx**

    M3 WA#1: Venn Diagram

    **Assignment: Comparing Cognitive Development Theories**

    **Objective:**

    To deepen your understanding of Piaget's Cognitive Developmental Theory and Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory by comparing their core concepts and applying these theories to practical classroom settings.

    **Instructions:**

    **Read Chapter 7: Cognitive Development in Early Childhood:**

    · Carefully read the assigned chapter in your textbook, focusing on Piaget's Cognitive Developmental Theory and Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory.

    · Pay attention to the key principles, assumptions, and implications of each theory for early childhood education.

    **Complete the Comparison Chart**(See attachment)
    **:**

    · Create a chart that lists
    **at least 5 distinct traits** or key concepts specific to
    **Piaget** and
    **Vygotsky**.

    · In addition, identify
    **at least 3 traits** or ideas where
    **both theorists agree**.

    · The chart should be clear and organized, making it easy to compare and contrast the theories.

    **Write a Detailed Summary**

    · After completing the chart, write a
    **1-2 page summary** that describes how each theory would be reflected in an early childhood classroom.

    ·
    **For Piaget:** Discuss what a classroom would look like based on his theory. Consider aspects such as curriculum design, classroom setup, and teaching methods that align with his stages of cognitive development.

    ·
    **For Vygotsky:** Similarly, describe a classroom that incorporates his sociocultural approach. Consider how social interactions, scaffolding, and the zone of proximal development would influence the classroom environment and teaching practices.

    ·
    **Be specific** in your descriptions, providing examples of activities, materials, and teaching strategies that would align with each theorist's principles.

    **Submission Requirements:**

    ·
    **Completed comparison chart** depicting traits specific to each theorist and shared traits.

    ·
    **1-2 page summary** discussing the application of Piaget's and Vygotsky's theories in early childhood classrooms.

    **CognitiveDevelopmentinEarlyChildhoodCh7.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cognitivedevelopmentinearlychildhoodch7-docx)

    **CognitiveDevelopmentinEarlyChildhoodCh7.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cognitivedevelopmentinearlychildhoodch7-docx)

    **## M3WA.docx**

    M3 WA#1: Venn Diagram

    **Assignment: Comparing Cognitive Development Theories**

    **Objective:**

    To deepen your understanding of Piaget's Cognitive Developmental Theory and Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory by comparing their core concepts and applying these theories to practical classroom settings.

    **Instructions:**

    **Read Chapter 7: Cognitive Development in Early Childhood:**

    · Carefully read the assigned chapter in your textbook, focusing on Piaget's Cognitive Developmental Theory and Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory.

    · Pay attention to the key principles, assumptions, and implications of each theory for early childhood education.

    **Complete the Comparison Chart**(See attachment)
    **:**

    · Create a chart that lists
    **at least 5 distinct traits** or key concepts specific to
    **Piaget** and
    **Vygotsky**.

    · In addition, identify
    **at least 3 traits** or ideas where
    **both theorists agree**.

    · The chart should be clear and organized, making it easy to compare and contrast the theories.

    **Write a Detailed Summary**

    · After completing the chart, write a
    **1-2 page summary** that describes how each theory would be reflected in an early childhood classroom.

    ·
    **For Piaget:** Discuss what a classroom would look like based on his theory. Consider aspects such as curriculum design, classroom setup, and teaching methods that align with his stages of cognitive development.

    ·
    **For Vygotsky:** Similarly, describe a classroom that incorporates his sociocultural approach. Consider how social interactions, scaffolding, and the zone of proximal development would influence the classroom environment and teaching practices.

    ·
    **Be specific** in your descriptions, providing examples of activities, materials, and teaching strategies that would align with each theorist's principles.

    **Submission Requirements:**

    ·
    **Completed comparison chart** depicting traits specific to each theorist and shared traits.

    ·
    **1-2 page summary** discussing the application of Piaget's and Vygotsky's theories in early childhood classrooms.

    **CognitiveDevelopmentinEarlyChildhoodCh7.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cognitivedevelopmentinearlychildhoodch7-docx)

    **## M3WA.docx**

    M3 WA#1: Venn Diagram

    **Assignment: Comparing Cognitive Development Theories**

    **Objective:**

    To deepen your understanding of Piaget's Cognitive Developmental Theory and Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory by comparing their core concepts and applying these theories to practical classroom settings.

    **Instructions:**

    **Read Chapter 7: Cognitive Development in Early Childhood:**

    · Carefully read the assigned chapter in your textbook, focusing on Piaget's Cognitive Developmental Theory and Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory.

    · Pay attention to the key principles, assumptions, and implications of each theory for early childhood education.

    **Complete the Comparison Chart**(See attachment)
    **:**

    · Create a chart that lists
    **at least 5 distinct traits** or key concepts specific to
    **Piaget** and
    **Vygotsky**.

    · In addition, identify
    **at least 3 traits** or ideas where
    **both theorists agree**.

    · The chart should be clear and organized, making it easy to compare and contrast the theories.

    **Write a Detailed Summary**

    · After completing the chart, write a
    **1-2 page summary** that describes how each theory would be reflected in an early childhood classroom.

    ·
    **For Piaget:** Discuss what a classroom would look like based on his theory. Consider aspects such as curriculum design, classroom setup, and teaching methods that align with his stages of cognitive development.

    ·
    **For Vygotsky:** Similarly, describe a classroom that incorporates his sociocultural approach. Consider how social interactions, scaffolding, and the zone of proximal development would influence the classroom environment and teaching practices.

    ·
    **Be specific** in your descriptions, providing examples of activities, materials, and teaching strategies that would align with each theorist's principles.

    **Submission Requirements:**

    ·
    **Completed comparison chart** depicting traits specific to each theorist and shared traits.

    ·
    **1-2 page summary** discussing the application of Piaget's and Vygotsky's theories in early childhood classrooms.

    **CognitiveDevelopmentinEarlyChildhoodCh7.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cognitivedevelopmentinearlychildhoodch7-docx)

  • [Solved] assitant needed nw

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachment **files (1)** – ## discussionweek.docx **## discussionweek.docx** 1-Listen to this 33 minute podcast on leading without authority. Chances are pretty good that if you are named project manager you won't be the supervisor of all the members of the team. Reflect on one item that …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachment

    **files (1)**

    – ## discussionweek.docx

    **## discussionweek.docx**

    1-Listen to this 33 minute podcast on leading without authority. Chances are pretty good that if you are named project manager you won't be the supervisor of all the members of the team. Reflect on one item that you took from the podcast and create your original thread, then read at least 25% of the posts from others and comment on at least two to earn full points. No need for citation of references for this discussion.

    [https://www.project-management-podcast.com/leadership](https://www.project-management-podcast.com/leadership)

    2-
    Table of Contents [Unit 3 (3/30/26-4/5/26) Project Design](https://mnsu.learn.minnstate.edu/d2l/le/content/7496798/Home?itemIdentifier=D2L.LE.Content.ContentObject.ModuleCO-76280707) UNIT 3.2- Project Misalignment

    UNIT 3.2- Project Misalignment

    Read this article on Project Misalignment.
    [https://edison365.com/what-is-project-misalignment/](https://edison365.com/what-is-project-misalignment/)

    Then go online and search for an example of project misalignment with the organization's strategic vision or mission. Briefly summarize the misalignment and why it happened. You have to post your thread before you can read the examples others post. Read at least 25% of your classmates' posts and comment on two of them or answer questions posed to you in order to get full credit.

    Make sure you cite the source for your example in APA format at the bottom of your original thread (post).

    **## discussionweek.docx**

    1-Listen to this 33 minute podcast on leading without authority. Chances are pretty good that if you are named project manager you won't be the supervisor of all the members of the team. Reflect on one item that you took from the podcast and create your original thread, then read at least 25% of the posts from others and comment on at least two to earn full points. No need for citation of references for this discussion.

    [https://www.project-management-podcast.com/leadership](https://www.project-management-podcast.com/leadership)

    2-
    Table of Contents [Unit 3 (3/30/26-4/5/26) Project Design](https://mnsu.learn.minnstate.edu/d2l/le/content/7496798/Home?itemIdentifier=D2L.LE.Content.ContentObject.ModuleCO-76280707) UNIT 3.2- Project Misalignment

    UNIT 3.2- Project Misalignment

    Read this article on Project Misalignment.
    [https://edison365.com/what-is-project-misalignment/](https://edison365.com/what-is-project-misalignment/)

    Then go online and search for an example of project misalignment with the organization's strategic vision or mission. Briefly summarize the misalignment and why it happened. You have to post your thread before you can read the examples others post. Read at least 25% of your classmates' posts and comment on two of them or answer questions posed to you in order to get full credit.

    Make sure you cite the source for your example in APA format at the bottom of your original thread (post).

  • [Solved] Engagement Plan

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (3)** – ## AssignmentInstructions.pdf – ## Rubric.pdf – HandbookofSchoolImprovementEbook.pdf **## AssignmentInstructions.pdf** Parent and Community Engagement Plan Assignment Instructions: NELP 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 PSEL 3b, 3g, 8a, 8b, 8c Overarching Question: How can we engage diverse families in …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (3)**

    – ## AssignmentInstructions.pdf

    – ## Rubric.pdf

    – HandbookofSchoolImprovementEbook.pdf

    **## AssignmentInstructions.pdf**

    Parent and Community Engagement Plan

    Assignment Instructions:

    NELP 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 PSEL 3b, 3g, 8a, 8b, 8c

    Overarching Question:
    How can we engage diverse families in and out of school to strengthen a vision and mission
    committed to student learning?

    Overview:
    Candidates will complete a SWOT analysis of family-school partnerships that support the
    school’s vision, mission, and related improvement efforts. To complete your analysis,
    confer with at least one member of your school staff and one community
    member. The SWOT graphic provided will help frame your thinking and guide the
    process. Candidates will create their own graphic that captures the 4 elements
    of their SWOT analysis. Along with the graphic analysis, candidates will submit a 3 – 4-page
    narrative that describes the strategies for improvement based on alignment with Joyce
    Epstein’s six types of parent involvement and how specific links to student learning will be
    reinforced and supported. Candidates will also provide details explaining how potential
    “threats” will be mitigated. The final assessment shall include the following details:

    1. All 4 elements of your SWOT analysis presented in your graphic.
    2. Strategies for improving family and community partnerships based on Joyce

    Epstein’s 6 types of parent engagement.
    3. Details that explain how your strategies for improvement will strengthen the

    connections between parent engagement and student learning.
    4. Explanation of how potential threats will be avoided or eliminated.
    5. Indicate the contributions of your staff and community member throughout your

    analysis/assessment.
    6. Include the essential question you will be answering or analyzing.

    [https://view.genial.ly/60394f207406150d24269923/horizontal-infographic-diagrams-swot-analysis](https://view.genial.ly/60394f207406150d24269923/horizontal-infographic-diagrams-swot-analysis)

    **## Rubric.pdf**

    Parent and Community Engagement Plan

    Standard/Component
    Level 1

    Approaching Standard
    0-10 points

    Level 2
    Meeting Standard

    11-13 points

    Level 3
    Exceeding Standard

    14-15 points
    Collaboratively engage diverse
    families in strengthening
    student learning in and out of
    school.
    NELP 5.1

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate some
    understanding of how family
    members can promote
    learning in and out of school.
    The analysis and narrative lack
    specific detail and provide
    evidence of two or less of the
    following indicators:

    5.1a knowledge of research on
    the role of families in
    supporting student learning in
    and out of school.

    5.1b knowledge of strategies
    for understanding and
    cultivating relationships with
    families and engaging them in
    their children’s education.

    5.1c capacity to gather
    information about family
    demographics and funds of
    knowledge available within
    students’ families that can be

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate an
    understanding of how family
    members can promote
    learning in and out of school.
    The analysis and narrative are
    detailed and include at least
    three of the following
    indicators:

    5.1a knowledge of research on
    the role of families in
    supporting student learning in
    and out of school.

    5.1b knowledge of strategies
    for understanding and
    cultivating relationships with
    families and engaging them in
    their children’s education.

    5.1c capacity to gather
    information about family
    demographics and funds of
    knowledge available within
    students’ families that can be

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate a compelling
    understanding of how family
    members can promote
    learning in and out of school.
    The analysis and narrative are
    detailed and provide
    consistent and solid evidence
    of the candidate’s:

    5.1a knowledge of research on
    the role of families in
    supporting student learning in
    and out of school.

    5.1b knowledge of strategies
    for understanding and
    cultivating relationships with
    families and engaging them in
    their children’s education.

    5.1c capacity to gather
    information about family
    demographics and funds of
    knowledge available within
    students’ families that can be

    accessed to enhance student
    learning.

    5.1d capacity to cultivate
    collaboration among staff and
    families in support of student
    learning and success.

    5.1e capacity to foster two-
    way communication with
    families.

    accessed to enhance student
    learning.

    5.1d capacity to cultivate
    collaboration among staff and
    families in support of student
    learning and success.

    5.1e capacity to foster two-
    way communication with
    families.

    accessed to enhance student
    learning.

    5.1d capacity to cultivate
    collaboration among staff and
    families in support of student
    learning and success.

    5.1e capacity to foster two-
    way communication with
    families.

    Standard/Component
    Level 1

    Approaching Standard
    0-10 points

    Level 2
    Meeting Standard

    11-13 points

    Level 3
    Exceeding Standard

    14-15 points
    Collaboratively engage and
    cultivate relationship with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies for the benefit
    of school improvement and
    student development.
    NELP 5.2

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate some
    understanding of how family
    and community partnerships
    can promote school
    improvement and student
    achievement. The analysis
    and narrative lack specific
    detail and provide evidence
    of two or less of the following
    indicators:

    5.2a knowledge of school
    organizational cultures that
    promote community
    engagement.

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate an
    understanding of how family
    and community partnerships
    can promote school
    improvement and student
    achievement. The analysis
    and narrative include at least
    three of the following
    indicators:

    5.2a knowledge of school
    organizational cultures that
    promote community
    engagement.

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate an in-depth
    understanding of how family
    and community partnerships
    can promote school
    improvement and student
    achievement. The analysis and
    narrative are detailed and
    provide consistent and solid
    evidence of the candidate’s:

    5.2a knowledge of school
    organizational cultures that
    promote community
    engagement.

    5.2b knowledge of how
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies can support
    school improvement and
    student success.

    5.2c knowledge of
    collaboration methods to
    develop and sustain
    productive relationships with
    diverse community partners.

    5.2d capacity to
    collaboratively engage with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies around shared
    goals.

    5.2e capacity to cultivate
    regular, two-way
    communication with
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies.

    5.2b knowledge of how
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies can support
    school improvement and
    student success.

    5.2c knowledge of
    collaboration methods to
    develop and sustain
    productive relationships with
    diverse community partners.

    5.2d capacity to
    collaboratively engage with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies around shared
    goals.

    5.2e capacity to cultivate
    regular, two-way
    communication with
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies.

    5.2b knowledge of how
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies can support
    school improvement and
    student success.

    5.2c knowledge of
    collaboration methods to
    develop and sustain
    productive relationships with
    diverse community partners.

    5.2d capacity to
    collaboratively engage with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies around shared
    goals.

    5.2e capacity to cultivate
    regular, two-way
    communication with
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies.

    Standard/Component
    Level 1

    Approaching Standard
    0-7 points

    Level 2
    Meeting Standard

    8-9 points

    Level 3
    Exceeding Standard

    10 points

    Communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with the larger organizational,
    community, and political
    context when advocating for
    the needs of their school and
    community.

    NELP 5.3

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate some
    understanding and ability to
    communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with school and community
    organizations as well as
    advocating in a political
    context for the needs of the
    school and community. The
    analysis and narrative t
    provide evidence of two or
    less of the following
    indicators:

    5.3a strategies for effective
    oral, written, and digital
    communication with members
    of the organization,
    community, and policy
    communities.

    5.3b capacity for identifying
    and accessing resources.

    5.3c capacity to gather
    information about policies and
    school/district context.

    5.3d capacity to develop
    targeted communication for

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate the
    understanding and ability to
    communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with school and community
    organizations as well as
    advocating in a political
    context for the needs of the
    school and community. The
    analysis and narrative are
    detailed and include at least
    three of the following
    indicators:

    5.3a strategies for effective
    oral, written, and digital
    communication with members
    of the organization,
    community, and policy
    communities.

    5.3b capacity for identifying
    and accessing resources.

    5.3c capacity to gather
    information about policies and
    school/district context.

    5.3d capacity to develop
    targeted communication for

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate a working
    understanding and ability to
    communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with school and community
    organizations as well as
    advocating in a political
    context for the needs of the
    school and community. The
    analysis and narrative are
    detailed and provide
    consistent and solid evidence
    of the candidate’s:

    5.3a strategies for effective
    oral, written, and digital
    communication with members
    of the organization,
    community, and policy
    communities.

    5.3b capacity for identifying
    and accessing resources.

    5.3c capacity to gather
    information about policies and
    school/district context.

    5.3d capacity to develop
    targeted communication for

    oral, written, and digital
    distribution.

    5.3e capacity to advocate for
    school and community needs.

    oral, written, and digital
    distribution.

    5.3e capacity to advocate for
    school and community needs.

    oral, written, and digital
    distribution.

    5.3e capacity to advocate for
    school and community needs.

    **HandbookofSchoolImprovementEbook.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/handbookofschoolimprovementebook-pdf-10527461)

    **HandbookofSchoolImprovementEbook.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/handbookofschoolimprovementebook-pdf-10527461)

    **## AssignmentInstructions.pdf**

    Parent and Community Engagement Plan

    Assignment Instructions:

    NELP 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 PSEL 3b, 3g, 8a, 8b, 8c

    Overarching Question:
    How can we engage diverse families in and out of school to strengthen a vision and mission
    committed to student learning?

    Overview:
    Candidates will complete a SWOT analysis of family-school partnerships that support the
    school’s vision, mission, and related improvement efforts. To complete your analysis,
    confer with at least one member of your school staff and one community
    member. The SWOT graphic provided will help frame your thinking and guide the
    process. Candidates will create their own graphic that captures the 4 elements
    of their SWOT analysis. Along with the graphic analysis, candidates will submit a 3 – 4-page
    narrative that describes the strategies for improvement based on alignment with Joyce
    Epstein’s six types of parent involvement and how specific links to student learning will be
    reinforced and supported. Candidates will also provide details explaining how potential
    “threats” will be mitigated. The final assessment shall include the following details:

    1. All 4 elements of your SWOT analysis presented in your graphic.
    2. Strategies for improving family and community partnerships based on Joyce

    Epstein’s 6 types of parent engagement.
    3. Details that explain how your strategies for improvement will strengthen the

    connections between parent engagement and student learning.
    4. Explanation of how potential threats will be avoided or eliminated.
    5. Indicate the contributions of your staff and community member throughout your

    analysis/assessment.
    6. Include the essential question you will be answering or analyzing.

    [https://view.genial.ly/60394f207406150d24269923/horizontal-infographic-diagrams-swot-analysis](https://view.genial.ly/60394f207406150d24269923/horizontal-infographic-diagrams-swot-analysis)

    **## Rubric.pdf**

    Parent and Community Engagement Plan

    Standard/Component
    Level 1

    Approaching Standard
    0-10 points

    Level 2
    Meeting Standard

    11-13 points

    Level 3
    Exceeding Standard

    14-15 points
    Collaboratively engage diverse
    families in strengthening
    student learning in and out of
    school.
    NELP 5.1

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate some
    understanding of how family
    members can promote
    learning in and out of school.
    The analysis and narrative lack
    specific detail and provide
    evidence of two or less of the
    following indicators:

    5.1a knowledge of research on
    the role of families in
    supporting student learning in
    and out of school.

    5.1b knowledge of strategies
    for understanding and
    cultivating relationships with
    families and engaging them in
    their children’s education.

    5.1c capacity to gather
    information about family
    demographics and funds of
    knowledge available within
    students’ families that can be

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate an
    understanding of how family
    members can promote
    learning in and out of school.
    The analysis and narrative are
    detailed and include at least
    three of the following
    indicators:

    5.1a knowledge of research on
    the role of families in
    supporting student learning in
    and out of school.

    5.1b knowledge of strategies
    for understanding and
    cultivating relationships with
    families and engaging them in
    their children’s education.

    5.1c capacity to gather
    information about family
    demographics and funds of
    knowledge available within
    students’ families that can be

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate a compelling
    understanding of how family
    members can promote
    learning in and out of school.
    The analysis and narrative are
    detailed and provide
    consistent and solid evidence
    of the candidate’s:

    5.1a knowledge of research on
    the role of families in
    supporting student learning in
    and out of school.

    5.1b knowledge of strategies
    for understanding and
    cultivating relationships with
    families and engaging them in
    their children’s education.

    5.1c capacity to gather
    information about family
    demographics and funds of
    knowledge available within
    students’ families that can be

    accessed to enhance student
    learning.

    5.1d capacity to cultivate
    collaboration among staff and
    families in support of student
    learning and success.

    5.1e capacity to foster two-
    way communication with
    families.

    accessed to enhance student
    learning.

    5.1d capacity to cultivate
    collaboration among staff and
    families in support of student
    learning and success.

    5.1e capacity to foster two-
    way communication with
    families.

    accessed to enhance student
    learning.

    5.1d capacity to cultivate
    collaboration among staff and
    families in support of student
    learning and success.

    5.1e capacity to foster two-
    way communication with
    families.

    Standard/Component
    Level 1

    Approaching Standard
    0-10 points

    Level 2
    Meeting Standard

    11-13 points

    Level 3
    Exceeding Standard

    14-15 points
    Collaboratively engage and
    cultivate relationship with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies for the benefit
    of school improvement and
    student development.
    NELP 5.2

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate some
    understanding of how family
    and community partnerships
    can promote school
    improvement and student
    achievement. The analysis
    and narrative lack specific
    detail and provide evidence
    of two or less of the following
    indicators:

    5.2a knowledge of school
    organizational cultures that
    promote community
    engagement.

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate an
    understanding of how family
    and community partnerships
    can promote school
    improvement and student
    achievement. The analysis
    and narrative include at least
    three of the following
    indicators:

    5.2a knowledge of school
    organizational cultures that
    promote community
    engagement.

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate an in-depth
    understanding of how family
    and community partnerships
    can promote school
    improvement and student
    achievement. The analysis and
    narrative are detailed and
    provide consistent and solid
    evidence of the candidate’s:

    5.2a knowledge of school
    organizational cultures that
    promote community
    engagement.

    5.2b knowledge of how
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies can support
    school improvement and
    student success.

    5.2c knowledge of
    collaboration methods to
    develop and sustain
    productive relationships with
    diverse community partners.

    5.2d capacity to
    collaboratively engage with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies around shared
    goals.

    5.2e capacity to cultivate
    regular, two-way
    communication with
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies.

    5.2b knowledge of how
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies can support
    school improvement and
    student success.

    5.2c knowledge of
    collaboration methods to
    develop and sustain
    productive relationships with
    diverse community partners.

    5.2d capacity to
    collaboratively engage with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies around shared
    goals.

    5.2e capacity to cultivate
    regular, two-way
    communication with
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies.

    5.2b knowledge of how
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies can support
    school improvement and
    student success.

    5.2c knowledge of
    collaboration methods to
    develop and sustain
    productive relationships with
    diverse community partners.

    5.2d capacity to
    collaboratively engage with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies around shared
    goals.

    5.2e capacity to cultivate
    regular, two-way
    communication with
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies.

    Standard/Component
    Level 1

    Approaching Standard
    0-7 points

    Level 2
    Meeting Standard

    8-9 points

    Level 3
    Exceeding Standard

    10 points

    Communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with the larger organizational,
    community, and political
    context when advocating for
    the needs of their school and
    community.

    NELP 5.3

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate some
    understanding and ability to
    communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with school and community
    organizations as well as
    advocating in a political
    context for the needs of the
    school and community. The
    analysis and narrative t
    provide evidence of two or
    less of the following
    indicators:

    5.3a strategies for effective
    oral, written, and digital
    communication with members
    of the organization,
    community, and policy
    communities.

    5.3b capacity for identifying
    and accessing resources.

    5.3c capacity to gather
    information about policies and
    school/district context.

    5.3d capacity to develop
    targeted communication for

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate the
    understanding and ability to
    communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with school and community
    organizations as well as
    advocating in a political
    context for the needs of the
    school and community. The
    analysis and narrative are
    detailed and include at least
    three of the following
    indicators:

    5.3a strategies for effective
    oral, written, and digital
    communication with members
    of the organization,
    community, and policy
    communities.

    5.3b capacity for identifying
    and accessing resources.

    5.3c capacity to gather
    information about policies and
    school/district context.

    5.3d capacity to develop
    targeted communication for

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate a working
    understanding and ability to
    communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with school and community
    organizations as well as
    advocating in a political
    context for the needs of the
    school and community. The
    analysis and narrative are
    detailed and provide
    consistent and solid evidence
    of the candidate’s:

    5.3a strategies for effective
    oral, written, and digital
    communication with members
    of the organization,
    community, and policy
    communities.

    5.3b capacity for identifying
    and accessing resources.

    5.3c capacity to gather
    information about policies and
    school/district context.

    5.3d capacity to develop
    targeted communication for

    oral, written, and digital
    distribution.

    5.3e capacity to advocate for
    school and community needs.

    oral, written, and digital
    distribution.

    5.3e capacity to advocate for
    school and community needs.

    oral, written, and digital
    distribution.

    5.3e capacity to advocate for
    school and community needs.

    **HandbookofSchoolImprovementEbook.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/handbookofschoolimprovementebook-pdf-10527461)

    **## AssignmentInstructions.pdf**

    Parent and Community Engagement Plan

    Assignment Instructions:

    NELP 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 PSEL 3b, 3g, 8a, 8b, 8c

    Overarching Question:
    How can we engage diverse families in and out of school to strengthen a vision and mission
    committed to student learning?

    Overview:
    Candidates will complete a SWOT analysis of family-school partnerships that support the
    school’s vision, mission, and related improvement efforts. To complete your analysis,
    confer with at least one member of your school staff and one community
    member. The SWOT graphic provided will help frame your thinking and guide the
    process. Candidates will create their own graphic that captures the 4 elements
    of their SWOT analysis. Along with the graphic analysis, candidates will submit a 3 – 4-page
    narrative that describes the strategies for improvement based on alignment with Joyce
    Epstein’s six types of parent involvement and how specific links to student learning will be
    reinforced and supported. Candidates will also provide details explaining how potential
    “threats” will be mitigated. The final assessment shall include the following details:

    1. All 4 elements of your SWOT analysis presented in your graphic.
    2. Strategies for improving family and community partnerships based on Joyce

    Epstein’s 6 types of parent engagement.
    3. Details that explain how your strategies for improvement will strengthen the

    connections between parent engagement and student learning.
    4. Explanation of how potential threats will be avoided or eliminated.
    5. Indicate the contributions of your staff and community member throughout your

    analysis/assessment.
    6. Include the essential question you will be answering or analyzing.

    [https://view.genial.ly/60394f207406150d24269923/horizontal-infographic-diagrams-swot-analysis](https://view.genial.ly/60394f207406150d24269923/horizontal-infographic-diagrams-swot-analysis)

    **## Rubric.pdf**

    Parent and Community Engagement Plan

    Standard/Component
    Level 1

    Approaching Standard
    0-10 points

    Level 2
    Meeting Standard

    11-13 points

    Level 3
    Exceeding Standard

    14-15 points
    Collaboratively engage diverse
    families in strengthening
    student learning in and out of
    school.
    NELP 5.1

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate some
    understanding of how family
    members can promote
    learning in and out of school.
    The analysis and narrative lack
    specific detail and provide
    evidence of two or less of the
    following indicators:

    5.1a knowledge of research on
    the role of families in
    supporting student learning in
    and out of school.

    5.1b knowledge of strategies
    for understanding and
    cultivating relationships with
    families and engaging them in
    their children’s education.

    5.1c capacity to gather
    information about family
    demographics and funds of
    knowledge available within
    students’ families that can be

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate an
    understanding of how family
    members can promote
    learning in and out of school.
    The analysis and narrative are
    detailed and include at least
    three of the following
    indicators:

    5.1a knowledge of research on
    the role of families in
    supporting student learning in
    and out of school.

    5.1b knowledge of strategies
    for understanding and
    cultivating relationships with
    families and engaging them in
    their children’s education.

    5.1c capacity to gather
    information about family
    demographics and funds of
    knowledge available within
    students’ families that can be

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate a compelling
    understanding of how family
    members can promote
    learning in and out of school.
    The analysis and narrative are
    detailed and provide
    consistent and solid evidence
    of the candidate’s:

    5.1a knowledge of research on
    the role of families in
    supporting student learning in
    and out of school.

    5.1b knowledge of strategies
    for understanding and
    cultivating relationships with
    families and engaging them in
    their children’s education.

    5.1c capacity to gather
    information about family
    demographics and funds of
    knowledge available within
    students’ families that can be

    accessed to enhance student
    learning.

    5.1d capacity to cultivate
    collaboration among staff and
    families in support of student
    learning and success.

    5.1e capacity to foster two-
    way communication with
    families.

    accessed to enhance student
    learning.

    5.1d capacity to cultivate
    collaboration among staff and
    families in support of student
    learning and success.

    5.1e capacity to foster two-
    way communication with
    families.

    accessed to enhance student
    learning.

    5.1d capacity to cultivate
    collaboration among staff and
    families in support of student
    learning and success.

    5.1e capacity to foster two-
    way communication with
    families.

    Standard/Component
    Level 1

    Approaching Standard
    0-10 points

    Level 2
    Meeting Standard

    11-13 points

    Level 3
    Exceeding Standard

    14-15 points
    Collaboratively engage and
    cultivate relationship with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies for the benefit
    of school improvement and
    student development.
    NELP 5.2

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate some
    understanding of how family
    and community partnerships
    can promote school
    improvement and student
    achievement. The analysis
    and narrative lack specific
    detail and provide evidence
    of two or less of the following
    indicators:

    5.2a knowledge of school
    organizational cultures that
    promote community
    engagement.

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate an
    understanding of how family
    and community partnerships
    can promote school
    improvement and student
    achievement. The analysis
    and narrative include at least
    three of the following
    indicators:

    5.2a knowledge of school
    organizational cultures that
    promote community
    engagement.

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate an in-depth
    understanding of how family
    and community partnerships
    can promote school
    improvement and student
    achievement. The analysis and
    narrative are detailed and
    provide consistent and solid
    evidence of the candidate’s:

    5.2a knowledge of school
    organizational cultures that
    promote community
    engagement.

    5.2b knowledge of how
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies can support
    school improvement and
    student success.

    5.2c knowledge of
    collaboration methods to
    develop and sustain
    productive relationships with
    diverse community partners.

    5.2d capacity to
    collaboratively engage with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies around shared
    goals.

    5.2e capacity to cultivate
    regular, two-way
    communication with
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies.

    5.2b knowledge of how
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies can support
    school improvement and
    student success.

    5.2c knowledge of
    collaboration methods to
    develop and sustain
    productive relationships with
    diverse community partners.

    5.2d capacity to
    collaboratively engage with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies around shared
    goals.

    5.2e capacity to cultivate
    regular, two-way
    communication with
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies.

    5.2b knowledge of how
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies can support
    school improvement and
    student success.

    5.2c knowledge of
    collaboration methods to
    develop and sustain
    productive relationships with
    diverse community partners.

    5.2d capacity to
    collaboratively engage with
    diverse community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies around shared
    goals.

    5.2e capacity to cultivate
    regular, two-way
    communication with
    community members,
    partners, and other
    constituencies.

    Standard/Component
    Level 1

    Approaching Standard
    0-7 points

    Level 2
    Meeting Standard

    8-9 points

    Level 3
    Exceeding Standard

    10 points

    Communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with the larger organizational,
    community, and political
    context when advocating for
    the needs of their school and
    community.

    NELP 5.3

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate some
    understanding and ability to
    communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with school and community
    organizations as well as
    advocating in a political
    context for the needs of the
    school and community. The
    analysis and narrative t
    provide evidence of two or
    less of the following
    indicators:

    5.3a strategies for effective
    oral, written, and digital
    communication with members
    of the organization,
    community, and policy
    communities.

    5.3b capacity for identifying
    and accessing resources.

    5.3c capacity to gather
    information about policies and
    school/district context.

    5.3d capacity to develop
    targeted communication for

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate the
    understanding and ability to
    communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with school and community
    organizations as well as
    advocating in a political
    context for the needs of the
    school and community. The
    analysis and narrative are
    detailed and include at least
    three of the following
    indicators:

    5.3a strategies for effective
    oral, written, and digital
    communication with members
    of the organization,
    community, and policy
    communities.

    5.3b capacity for identifying
    and accessing resources.

    5.3c capacity to gather
    information about policies and
    school/district context.

    5.3d capacity to develop
    targeted communication for

    SWOT analysis and narrative
    demonstrate a working
    understanding and ability to
    communicate through oral,
    written, and digital means
    with school and community
    organizations as well as
    advocating in a political
    context for the needs of the
    school and community. The
    analysis and narrative are
    detailed and provide
    consistent and solid evidence
    of the candidate’s:

    5.3a strategies for effective
    oral, written, and digital
    communication with members
    of the organization,
    community, and policy
    communities.

    5.3b capacity for identifying
    and accessing resources.

    5.3c capacity to gather
    information about policies and
    school/district context.

    5.3d capacity to develop
    targeted communication for

    oral, written, and digital
    distribution.

    5.3e capacity to advocate for
    school and community needs.

    oral, written, and digital
    distribution.

    5.3e capacity to advocate for
    school and community needs.

    oral, written, and digital
    distribution.

    5.3e capacity to advocate for
    school and community needs.

    **HandbookofSchoolImprovementEbook.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/handbookofschoolimprovementebook-pdf-10527461)

  • [Solved] dee

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Individual Discussion Board Questions:** 1.) Assume that your research study will be quantitative in nature. Considering the potential responses to your questions, develop a numerical coding scheme (i.e., create a numerical code book) for each of your prospective variables. What are some of the is…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Individual Discussion Board Questions:**

    1.) Assume that your research study will be quantitative in nature.  Considering the potential responses to your questions, develop a  numerical coding scheme (i.e., create a numerical code book) for each of  your prospective variables. What are some of the issues that you will  need to consider? What are the benefits of this particular coding  scheme?

    2.) Babbie argues that there are three specific measures of central  tendency: the mean, the median, and the mode. Compare and contrast these  three measures of central tendency. Now, consider the following series  of numbers:

    1, 4, 1, 6, 8, 3, 5, 1, 1, 6, 9, 5, 9, 7, 2, 8, 9, 3, 6

    Calculate the mean, median, and mode for this list. Show your work where appropriate. What is the range for the above series?

    3.) What’s the difference between a discrete variable and a  continuous variable? Is it appropriate to calculate a mean for variables  that have been scaled at the ordinal or nominal level? Why or why not?

    4.) What’s the difference between a suppressor variable and a  distorter variable? How might such variables impact your particular  study? What potential suppressor and distorter variables might you need  to consider?

  • [Solved] edwards

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Discussion Thread: Ethics The Stanford Prison Experiment website in the resources section presents a comprehensive overview of the Stanford Prison Experiment, including original video of the experiment and interviews with individuals involved. After viewing the videos, generate class discussion o…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Discussion Thread: Ethics

    The Stanford Prison Experiment website  in the resources section presents a comprehensive overview of the  Stanford Prison Experiment, including original video of the experiment  and interviews with individuals involved. After viewing the videos,  generate class discussion on the ethical implications involved,  especially at what point the experiment should have been stopped (or  allowed to continue) based on modern principles. Why?

    – [\
    \
    DiscussionAssignmentInstructions46.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussionassignmentinstructions46-docx "DiscussionAssignmentInstructions46.docx")
    – [\
    \
    StanfordPrisonExperiment.htm](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/stanfordprisonexperiment-htm-10527563 "StanfordPrisonExperiment.htm")

  • [Solved] 580-planning reading instruction

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    There are various approaches to teaching reading and numerous instructional strategies that educators can use to engage students in reading and comprehending narrative and informational texts. It is critical for student success for teachers to understand reading standards and to plan effective, stan…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    There are various approaches to teaching reading and numerous instructional strategies that educators can use to engage students in reading and comprehending narrative and informational texts. It is critical for student success for teachers to understand reading standards and to plan effective, standards-based reading instruction that is supportive of all learners. Additionally, teachers must align their assessments to the standards and instruction to provide appropriate opportunities for students to demonstrate mastery.

    Utilize the “Planning Reading Instruction” template to complete the topic assignment.

    **Part 1: Approaches to Reading Instruction**

    Identify three approaches/methods (reading workshop, whole class reading of a core book, literature circles, sustained silent reading, etc.) to teaching reading and provide a 50 word description of each.

    **Part 2: Reading Standards and Learning Objectives**

    Write at least one measurable, developmentally appropriate learning objective for each of the provided reading standards.

    **Part 3: Whole Group Reading Lesson**

    Create a whole group reading lesson based on one of the standards and learning objectives in Part 2. Design differentiated activities that support the standard and learning objective that students can engage in before reading a text, while reading the text, and after reading the text.

    Support the template with 2-3 scholarly resources.

    – [\
    \
    ELM-580-RS-T1-PlanningReadingInstruction.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/elm-580-rs-t1-planningreadinginstruction-docx "ELM-580-RS-T1-PlanningReadingInstruction.docx")

  • [Solved] 580-2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Answer each question in 150 words each with at least 1 reference. 1. What is flexible grouping and how is it beneficial for student learning? Describe a potential challenge classroom teachers might face with this approach. 2. While you are working with each of your small reading groups, it is esse…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Answer each question in 150 words each with at least 1 reference.

    1. What is flexible grouping and how is it beneficial for student learning? Describe a potential challenge classroom teachers might face with this approach.

    2. While you are working with each of your small reading groups, it is essential that the rest of the class remains actively engaged. What learning opportunities can you provide to keep students on task and learning when they are not in the small reading group with the teacher?

  • [Solved] 580-1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Answer each question in 150 words each with at least 1 reference. 1. Research the ELA standards from Tennessee. How are the informational reading standards and the literature standards different? Identify and explain a specific genre. Discuss whether that specific genre would be more appropriate fo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Answer each question in 150 words each with at least 1 reference.

    1. Research the ELA standards from Tennessee. How are the informational reading standards and the literature standards different? Identify and explain a specific genre. Discuss whether that specific genre would be more appropriate for supporting informational or literature standards and justify why.

    2. What do you need to consider when unpacking an ELA standard and writing learning objectives? When addressing the diverse needs of students, what aspects might need to change?

  • [Solved] Catherine Owens

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Catherine Owens.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Journal Topic

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## Unit5Journal.docx – ## Towell_CLA1e_PPT_Ch06.pptx **## Unit5Journal.docx** Journal Topic Comprehension is how young children make meaning from stories—not just by hearing words, but by building connections, visualizing, asking questions, predicting, and interpreting text. This …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## Unit5Journal.docx

    – ## Towell_CLA1e_PPT_Ch06.pptx

    **## Unit5Journal.docx**

    Journal Topic

    Comprehension is how young children make meaning from stories—not just by hearing words, but by building connections, visualizing, asking questions, predicting, and interpreting text. This journal entry invites you to reflect on one comprehension strategy and consider how it supports meaning-making for young children.

    This journal builds on the learning you have done in Units 2–4 and helps you connect theory to practice in a personal, low-stakes way.

    Journal Prompt (250–350 words)

    Choose one comprehension strategy from this unit (e.g., making connections, predicting, asking questions, visualizing, retelling, summarizing, inferring, using text structure, monitoring comprehension).

    In your journal response, address the following four areas in your own words:

    1. Identify the Strategy (2–3 sentences)

    Name the strategy you selected and describe it in your own words.

    Focus on clarity rather than formal definitions.

    2. Why This Strategy Matters for Young Children (4–6 sentences)

    Explain why this strategy is important for helping children make sense of stories.

    Use ideas from the unit readings or resources to support your explanation.

    3. A Realistic Example From a Classroom or Read-Aloud (4–6 sentences)

    Describe how you have seen—or can imagine—a teacher modeling or teaching this strategy during a read-aloud or picture-book experience.

    You may draw from:

    your own work experience

    a memory from school

    an observation

    the videos or examples in the course

    4. How the Strategy Builds Comprehension (4–6 sentences)

    Explain how this strategy actually strengthens meaning-making for children.

    Think about:

    how it helps them understand the story

    how it builds language

    how it supports deeper thinking

    Submission Requirements

    Length: 250–350 words

    Format: Journal entry (not an academic paper)

    Voice: Write in your own authentic voice

    APA: Only required if you directly reference a source

    NAEYC 2021 Alignment

    Standard 5b: Understanding content knowledge in literacy

    Standard 5c: Using appropriate teaching strategies

    Standard 4b/4c: Supporting learning through intentional teaching

    Standard 6d: Professional communication

    Reference:

    **## Towell_CLA1e_PPT_Ch06.pptx**

    Reading Comprehension

    Chapter 6

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    1

    Chapter 6 Learning Objectives

    6-1 Explain reading comprehension concepts.

    6-2 Determine factors that impact comprehension instruction.

    6-3 Describe motivation for literacy engagement.

    6-4 Analyze comprehension instruction in the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).

    6-5 Apply comprehension strategies for children’s literature.

    6-6 Demonstrate literacy strategies and practices for reading comprehension.

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 1 of 3)

    Comprehension is the active process of constructing meaning with a text for a specific purpose

    Meaning is shaped by the text itself and the reader’s background knowledge

    Thinking critically about texts requires comprehension

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 2 of 3)

    Types of readers:

    Readers who have a meaning-based concept of reading understand that reading is about communicating ideas

    Readers who have a skill-based concept of reading are word callers, pronouncing words without meaning

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 3 of 3)

    Qualities of good readers:

    Able to understand own thinking during reading process (metacognition)

    Have a repertoire of comprehension strategies they use when they read

    e.g., predicting, summarizing, inferring

    Use all 3 language cueing systems automatically

    i.e., syntactic, semantic, graphophonic

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2 Factors that Impact Comprehension Instruction

    Level of interest

    Prior knowledge

    Text complexity

    Genre

    Type of text

    Vocabulary

    Pictures and other text features

    Sociocultural context

    Decoding skills

    English language proficiency

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 1 of 7)

    Making connections

    Predicting and inferring

    Questioning

    Monitoring and clarifying

    Summarizing and synthesizing

    Evaluating

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 2 of 7)

    Making connections

    Text-to-self

    Text-to-text

    Text-to-world

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 3 of 7)

    Predicting: Using evidence from the text to guess what it will be about

    Inferring: Using what is known to understand what is less certain

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 4 of 7)

    Questioning

    Literal questions

    Inferential questions

    Critical questions

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 5 of 7)

    Monitoring and clarifying

    Stopping routinely to monitor understanding

    Using fix-up strategies when off track

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 6 of 7)

    Summarizing: Succinctly stating the main ideas in a text

    Synthesizing: Thinking creatively about what has been learned and how thinking has changed

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 7 of 7)

    Evaluating

    Analyzing a text and making judgments

    (e.g., about a character’s decisions, about the author’s craft)

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 1 of 2)

    Enjoyment is a central part of reading and, therefore, must be a priority in teaching reading

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 2 of 2)

    To promote students’ motivation to read:

    Value reading for pleasure

    Encourage students to read when they have free time

    Allow choice in what to read

    Provide access to rich and varied books

    Use read-alouds to introduce new books and authors

    Build in time for talking about books and ideas

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4 Comprehension Instruction in the Common Core State Standards

    Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require critical thinking and deep comprehension

    Students must be able to read and understand complex texts in multiple genres across the curriculum

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4a Close Reading

    Close reading is an instructional routine

    Students critically examine a text

    Examination often happens through repeated readings

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 1 of 3)

    Text complexity: characteristics of texts that are critical for comprehension

    Narrative texts and informational texts have different features that contribute to their complexity

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 2 of 3)

    Text complexity for narrative texts:

    Text structures (e.g., multiple plot lines)

    Text features (e.g., table of contents, embedded illustrations)

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 3 of 3)

    Text complexity for informational texts:

    Text structures (e.g., cause and effect, question and answer)

    Text features (e.g., table of contents, maps, graphs)

    Concepts

    Key content area vocabulary

    Informational texts tend to be more challenging for students because they are less familiar

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-5 Comprehension Strategies for Children’s Literature

    Comprehension strategies involve interactive activities to engage students cognitively, socioemotionally, and physically

    Examples include:

    Book talks

    Jackdaws

    Open mind portraits

    Quick write or quick draw

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-6 Literacy Strategies and Practices for Reading Comprehension

    Comprehension instruction is designed to support students as they make meaning with texts

    The texts should be carefully selected

    The activities should scaffold students’ creative and thoughtful engagement with ideas

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.emf

    ## image2.emf

    ## image3.emf

    ## image4.emf

    ## image5.emf

    ## image6.emf

    ## image7.emf

    ## image8.emf

    ## image9.tiff

    **## Towell_CLA1e_PPT_Ch06.pptx**

    Reading Comprehension

    Chapter 6

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    1

    Chapter 6 Learning Objectives

    6-1 Explain reading comprehension concepts.

    6-2 Determine factors that impact comprehension instruction.

    6-3 Describe motivation for literacy engagement.

    6-4 Analyze comprehension instruction in the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).

    6-5 Apply comprehension strategies for children’s literature.

    6-6 Demonstrate literacy strategies and practices for reading comprehension.

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 1 of 3)

    Comprehension is the active process of constructing meaning with a text for a specific purpose

    Meaning is shaped by the text itself and the reader’s background knowledge

    Thinking critically about texts requires comprehension

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 2 of 3)

    Types of readers:

    Readers who have a meaning-based concept of reading understand that reading is about communicating ideas

    Readers who have a skill-based concept of reading are word callers, pronouncing words without meaning

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 3 of 3)

    Qualities of good readers:

    Able to understand own thinking during reading process (metacognition)

    Have a repertoire of comprehension strategies they use when they read

    e.g., predicting, summarizing, inferring

    Use all 3 language cueing systems automatically

    i.e., syntactic, semantic, graphophonic

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2 Factors that Impact Comprehension Instruction

    Level of interest

    Prior knowledge

    Text complexity

    Genre

    Type of text

    Vocabulary

    Pictures and other text features

    Sociocultural context

    Decoding skills

    English language proficiency

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 1 of 7)

    Making connections

    Predicting and inferring

    Questioning

    Monitoring and clarifying

    Summarizing and synthesizing

    Evaluating

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 2 of 7)

    Making connections

    Text-to-self

    Text-to-text

    Text-to-world

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 3 of 7)

    Predicting: Using evidence from the text to guess what it will be about

    Inferring: Using what is known to understand what is less certain

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 4 of 7)

    Questioning

    Literal questions

    Inferential questions

    Critical questions

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 5 of 7)

    Monitoring and clarifying

    Stopping routinely to monitor understanding

    Using fix-up strategies when off track

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 6 of 7)

    Summarizing: Succinctly stating the main ideas in a text

    Synthesizing: Thinking creatively about what has been learned and how thinking has changed

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 7 of 7)

    Evaluating

    Analyzing a text and making judgments

    (e.g., about a character’s decisions, about the author’s craft)

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 1 of 2)

    Enjoyment is a central part of reading and, therefore, must be a priority in teaching reading

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 2 of 2)

    To promote students’ motivation to read:

    Value reading for pleasure

    Encourage students to read when they have free time

    Allow choice in what to read

    Provide access to rich and varied books

    Use read-alouds to introduce new books and authors

    Build in time for talking about books and ideas

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4 Comprehension Instruction in the Common Core State Standards

    Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require critical thinking and deep comprehension

    Students must be able to read and understand complex texts in multiple genres across the curriculum

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4a Close Reading

    Close reading is an instructional routine

    Students critically examine a text

    Examination often happens through repeated readings

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 1 of 3)

    Text complexity: characteristics of texts that are critical for comprehension

    Narrative texts and informational texts have different features that contribute to their complexity

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 2 of 3)

    Text complexity for narrative texts:

    Text structures (e.g., multiple plot lines)

    Text features (e.g., table of contents, embedded illustrations)

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 3 of 3)

    Text complexity for informational texts:

    Text structures (e.g., cause and effect, question and answer)

    Text features (e.g., table of contents, maps, graphs)

    Concepts

    Key content area vocabulary

    Informational texts tend to be more challenging for students because they are less familiar

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-5 Comprehension Strategies for Children’s Literature

    Comprehension strategies involve interactive activities to engage students cognitively, socioemotionally, and physically

    Examples include:

    Book talks

    Jackdaws

    Open mind portraits

    Quick write or quick draw

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-6 Literacy Strategies and Practices for Reading Comprehension

    Comprehension instruction is designed to support students as they make meaning with texts

    The texts should be carefully selected

    The activities should scaffold students’ creative and thoughtful engagement with ideas

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.emf

    ## image2.emf

    ## image3.emf

    ## image4.emf

    ## image5.emf

    ## image6.emf

    ## image7.emf

    ## image8.emf

    ## image9.tiff

    **## Unit5Journal.docx**

    Journal Topic

    Comprehension is how young children make meaning from stories—not just by hearing words, but by building connections, visualizing, asking questions, predicting, and interpreting text. This journal entry invites you to reflect on one comprehension strategy and consider how it supports meaning-making for young children.

    This journal builds on the learning you have done in Units 2–4 and helps you connect theory to practice in a personal, low-stakes way.

    Journal Prompt (250–350 words)

    Choose one comprehension strategy from this unit (e.g., making connections, predicting, asking questions, visualizing, retelling, summarizing, inferring, using text structure, monitoring comprehension).

    In your journal response, address the following four areas in your own words:

    1. Identify the Strategy (2–3 sentences)

    Name the strategy you selected and describe it in your own words.

    Focus on clarity rather than formal definitions.

    2. Why This Strategy Matters for Young Children (4–6 sentences)

    Explain why this strategy is important for helping children make sense of stories.

    Use ideas from the unit readings or resources to support your explanation.

    3. A Realistic Example From a Classroom or Read-Aloud (4–6 sentences)

    Describe how you have seen—or can imagine—a teacher modeling or teaching this strategy during a read-aloud or picture-book experience.

    You may draw from:

    your own work experience

    a memory from school

    an observation

    the videos or examples in the course

    4. How the Strategy Builds Comprehension (4–6 sentences)

    Explain how this strategy actually strengthens meaning-making for children.

    Think about:

    how it helps them understand the story

    how it builds language

    how it supports deeper thinking

    Submission Requirements

    Length: 250–350 words

    Format: Journal entry (not an academic paper)

    Voice: Write in your own authentic voice

    APA: Only required if you directly reference a source

    NAEYC 2021 Alignment

    Standard 5b: Understanding content knowledge in literacy

    Standard 5c: Using appropriate teaching strategies

    Standard 4b/4c: Supporting learning through intentional teaching

    Standard 6d: Professional communication

    Reference:

    **## Towell_CLA1e_PPT_Ch06.pptx**

    Reading Comprehension

    Chapter 6

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    1

    Chapter 6 Learning Objectives

    6-1 Explain reading comprehension concepts.

    6-2 Determine factors that impact comprehension instruction.

    6-3 Describe motivation for literacy engagement.

    6-4 Analyze comprehension instruction in the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).

    6-5 Apply comprehension strategies for children’s literature.

    6-6 Demonstrate literacy strategies and practices for reading comprehension.

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 1 of 3)

    Comprehension is the active process of constructing meaning with a text for a specific purpose

    Meaning is shaped by the text itself and the reader’s background knowledge

    Thinking critically about texts requires comprehension

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 2 of 3)

    Types of readers:

    Readers who have a meaning-based concept of reading understand that reading is about communicating ideas

    Readers who have a skill-based concept of reading are word callers, pronouncing words without meaning

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 3 of 3)

    Qualities of good readers:

    Able to understand own thinking during reading process (metacognition)

    Have a repertoire of comprehension strategies they use when they read

    e.g., predicting, summarizing, inferring

    Use all 3 language cueing systems automatically

    i.e., syntactic, semantic, graphophonic

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2 Factors that Impact Comprehension Instruction

    Level of interest

    Prior knowledge

    Text complexity

    Genre

    Type of text

    Vocabulary

    Pictures and other text features

    Sociocultural context

    Decoding skills

    English language proficiency

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 1 of 7)

    Making connections

    Predicting and inferring

    Questioning

    Monitoring and clarifying

    Summarizing and synthesizing

    Evaluating

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 2 of 7)

    Making connections

    Text-to-self

    Text-to-text

    Text-to-world

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 3 of 7)

    Predicting: Using evidence from the text to guess what it will be about

    Inferring: Using what is known to understand what is less certain

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 4 of 7)

    Questioning

    Literal questions

    Inferential questions

    Critical questions

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 5 of 7)

    Monitoring and clarifying

    Stopping routinely to monitor understanding

    Using fix-up strategies when off track

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 6 of 7)

    Summarizing: Succinctly stating the main ideas in a text

    Synthesizing: Thinking creatively about what has been learned and how thinking has changed

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 7 of 7)

    Evaluating

    Analyzing a text and making judgments

    (e.g., about a character’s decisions, about the author’s craft)

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 1 of 2)

    Enjoyment is a central part of reading and, therefore, must be a priority in teaching reading

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 2 of 2)

    To promote students’ motivation to read:

    Value reading for pleasure

    Encourage students to read when they have free time

    Allow choice in what to read

    Provide access to rich and varied books

    Use read-alouds to introduce new books and authors

    Build in time for talking about books and ideas

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4 Comprehension Instruction in the Common Core State Standards

    Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require critical thinking and deep comprehension

    Students must be able to read and understand complex texts in multiple genres across the curriculum

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4a Close Reading

    Close reading is an instructional routine

    Students critically examine a text

    Examination often happens through repeated readings

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 1 of 3)

    Text complexity: characteristics of texts that are critical for comprehension

    Narrative texts and informational texts have different features that contribute to their complexity

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 2 of 3)

    Text complexity for narrative texts:

    Text structures (e.g., multiple plot lines)

    Text features (e.g., table of contents, embedded illustrations)

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 3 of 3)

    Text complexity for informational texts:

    Text structures (e.g., cause and effect, question and answer)

    Text features (e.g., table of contents, maps, graphs)

    Concepts

    Key content area vocabulary

    Informational texts tend to be more challenging for students because they are less familiar

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-5 Comprehension Strategies for Children’s Literature

    Comprehension strategies involve interactive activities to engage students cognitively, socioemotionally, and physically

    Examples include:

    Book talks

    Jackdaws

    Open mind portraits

    Quick write or quick draw

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-6 Literacy Strategies and Practices for Reading Comprehension

    Comprehension instruction is designed to support students as they make meaning with texts

    The texts should be carefully selected

    The activities should scaffold students’ creative and thoughtful engagement with ideas

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.emf

    ## image2.emf

    ## image3.emf

    ## image4.emf

    ## image5.emf

    ## image6.emf

    ## image7.emf

    ## image8.emf

    ## image9.tiff

    **## Unit5Journal.docx**

    Journal Topic

    Comprehension is how young children make meaning from stories—not just by hearing words, but by building connections, visualizing, asking questions, predicting, and interpreting text. This journal entry invites you to reflect on one comprehension strategy and consider how it supports meaning-making for young children.

    This journal builds on the learning you have done in Units 2–4 and helps you connect theory to practice in a personal, low-stakes way.

    Journal Prompt (250–350 words)

    Choose one comprehension strategy from this unit (e.g., making connections, predicting, asking questions, visualizing, retelling, summarizing, inferring, using text structure, monitoring comprehension).

    In your journal response, address the following four areas in your own words:

    1. Identify the Strategy (2–3 sentences)

    Name the strategy you selected and describe it in your own words.

    Focus on clarity rather than formal definitions.

    2. Why This Strategy Matters for Young Children (4–6 sentences)

    Explain why this strategy is important for helping children make sense of stories.

    Use ideas from the unit readings or resources to support your explanation.

    3. A Realistic Example From a Classroom or Read-Aloud (4–6 sentences)

    Describe how you have seen—or can imagine—a teacher modeling or teaching this strategy during a read-aloud or picture-book experience.

    You may draw from:

    your own work experience

    a memory from school

    an observation

    the videos or examples in the course

    4. How the Strategy Builds Comprehension (4–6 sentences)

    Explain how this strategy actually strengthens meaning-making for children.

    Think about:

    how it helps them understand the story

    how it builds language

    how it supports deeper thinking

    Submission Requirements

    Length: 250–350 words

    Format: Journal entry (not an academic paper)

    Voice: Write in your own authentic voice

    APA: Only required if you directly reference a source

    NAEYC 2021 Alignment

    Standard 5b: Understanding content knowledge in literacy

    Standard 5c: Using appropriate teaching strategies

    Standard 4b/4c: Supporting learning through intentional teaching

    Standard 6d: Professional communication

    Reference:

    **## Towell_CLA1e_PPT_Ch06.pptx**

    Reading Comprehension

    Chapter 6

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    1

    Chapter 6 Learning Objectives

    6-1 Explain reading comprehension concepts.

    6-2 Determine factors that impact comprehension instruction.

    6-3 Describe motivation for literacy engagement.

    6-4 Analyze comprehension instruction in the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).

    6-5 Apply comprehension strategies for children’s literature.

    6-6 Demonstrate literacy strategies and practices for reading comprehension.

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 1 of 3)

    Comprehension is the active process of constructing meaning with a text for a specific purpose

    Meaning is shaped by the text itself and the reader’s background knowledge

    Thinking critically about texts requires comprehension

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 2 of 3)

    Types of readers:

    Readers who have a meaning-based concept of reading understand that reading is about communicating ideas

    Readers who have a skill-based concept of reading are word callers, pronouncing words without meaning

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 3 of 3)

    Qualities of good readers:

    Able to understand own thinking during reading process (metacognition)

    Have a repertoire of comprehension strategies they use when they read

    e.g., predicting, summarizing, inferring

    Use all 3 language cueing systems automatically

    i.e., syntactic, semantic, graphophonic

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2 Factors that Impact Comprehension Instruction

    Level of interest

    Prior knowledge

    Text complexity

    Genre

    Type of text

    Vocabulary

    Pictures and other text features

    Sociocultural context

    Decoding skills

    English language proficiency

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 1 of 7)

    Making connections

    Predicting and inferring

    Questioning

    Monitoring and clarifying

    Summarizing and synthesizing

    Evaluating

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 2 of 7)

    Making connections

    Text-to-self

    Text-to-text

    Text-to-world

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 3 of 7)

    Predicting: Using evidence from the text to guess what it will be about

    Inferring: Using what is known to understand what is less certain

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 4 of 7)

    Questioning

    Literal questions

    Inferential questions

    Critical questions

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 5 of 7)

    Monitoring and clarifying

    Stopping routinely to monitor understanding

    Using fix-up strategies when off track

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 6 of 7)

    Summarizing: Succinctly stating the main ideas in a text

    Synthesizing: Thinking creatively about what has been learned and how thinking has changed

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 7 of 7)

    Evaluating

    Analyzing a text and making judgments

    (e.g., about a character’s decisions, about the author’s craft)

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 1 of 2)

    Enjoyment is a central part of reading and, therefore, must be a priority in teaching reading

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 2 of 2)

    To promote students’ motivation to read:

    Value reading for pleasure

    Encourage students to read when they have free time

    Allow choice in what to read

    Provide access to rich and varied books

    Use read-alouds to introduce new books and authors

    Build in time for talking about books and ideas

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4 Comprehension Instruction in the Common Core State Standards

    Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require critical thinking and deep comprehension

    Students must be able to read and understand complex texts in multiple genres across the curriculum

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4a Close Reading

    Close reading is an instructional routine

    Students critically examine a text

    Examination often happens through repeated readings

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 1 of 3)

    Text complexity: characteristics of texts that are critical for comprehension

    Narrative texts and informational texts have different features that contribute to their complexity

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 2 of 3)

    Text complexity for narrative texts:

    Text structures (e.g., multiple plot lines)

    Text features (e.g., table of contents, embedded illustrations)

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 3 of 3)

    Text complexity for informational texts:

    Text structures (e.g., cause and effect, question and answer)

    Text features (e.g., table of contents, maps, graphs)

    Concepts

    Key content area vocabulary

    Informational texts tend to be more challenging for students because they are less familiar

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-5 Comprehension Strategies for Children’s Literature

    Comprehension strategies involve interactive activities to engage students cognitively, socioemotionally, and physically

    Examples include:

    Book talks

    Jackdaws

    Open mind portraits

    Quick write or quick draw

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    6-6 Literacy Strategies and Practices for Reading Comprehension

    Comprehension instruction is designed to support students as they make meaning with texts

    The texts should be carefully selected

    The activities should scaffold students’ creative and thoughtful engagement with ideas

    ©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.emf

    ## image2.emf

    ## image3.emf

    ## image4.emf

    ## image5.emf

    ## image6.emf

    ## image7.emf

    ## image8.emf

    ## image9.tiff