Executive Solution Overview
Please up instructions and No AI or ChatGPT's . Please read and answer properly. Thanks **files (2)** – ## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf – ## Week3_Assignment11.pdf **## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf** WEEK 3: AT A GLANCE FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND THE C…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Please up instructions and No AI or ChatGPT's . Please read and answer properly. Thanks
**files (2)**
– ## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf
– ## Week3_Assignment11.pdf
**## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf**
WEEK 3: AT A GLANCE
FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND THE COURT SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
Two parents who love their three school-age children are divorcing. The mother is a highly
compensated and successful business executive. The father, a stay-at-home dad, is involved
extensively in all daily aspects of the children’s lives. A conviction for drug dealing, possession,
and use during his third year at college has prevented him from securing well-paid employment.
Both parents want full custody of their children. What factors should the courts consider in this
matter? Should the children’s parental preferences be taken into account? Should they be
allowed to testify in their own custody case?
Consider a vastly different scenario. A 48-year-old high school basketball coach has been
accused of sexually assaulting several of his former male basketball players. Although he has
had no previous arrests, the actual assaults involved violent behavior, and victims reported that
they had been threatened with physical harm if they reported any of the incidents to authorities.
Should the coach be released after serving his sentence at a state penitentiary or be committed
to a specialized state-run treatment center for sex offenders? A forensic psychologist may be
asked to weigh in on these highly charged court cases.
In civil cases (non-criminal cases), forensic psychologists play a variety of roles. Examples of
their responsibilities include making custody recommendations and evaluating the "fitness" of
DISCUSSION
(https://w
ASSIGNMENT
(https://w
RESOURCES
(https://w
(https://cdn-
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/
1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
each parent to raise a child. In criminal cases, a forensic psychologist may conduct a risk
assessment of a convicted sex offender. The results of the assessment may be used to inform
the court as to whether the offender should be indefinitely committed to a psychiatric or
correctional facility or be released after serving his or her sentence.
In the criminal justice system, it is imperative that defendants understand what is happening,
from the moment of arrest to sentencing and punishment. Before a trial can even begin,
defendants must be competent to stand trial—meaning that they understand and appreciate the
nature of the charges against them, and they can assist their attorney in formulating a defense.
Once competency is established, the defendant has several plea options, including guilty, not
guilty, and not guilty by reason of insanity. Forensic psychologists are often called upon to
determine a defendant’s competency when in question, and to provide the court an ultimate
opinion regarding the defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense.
This week, you examine relevant factors related to child testimony in child custody and child
protection cases. You also evaluate risk assessment criteria in civil commitment cases for sex
offenders. You also complete an Application Assignment that focuses on the issues of
Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Students will:
Evaluate criteria concerning risk assessment in civil commitment cases for sex offenders (D)
Evaluate the use of forensic psychology as it applies to child custody disputes and parental
competence (D)
Analyze the concepts of Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense as they relate to
the trial process (A)
**## Week3_Assignment11.pdf**
Due Apr 26 by 10:59pm
Points 120
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL AND THE
INSANITY DEFENSE
For this week’s Application, you analyze a case study and discuss if the insanity defense would be
successful and if the defendant would be found competent to stand trial.
To prepare:
Review Chapters 8 and 10 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology, and focus on the issues
surrounding competence to stand trial and the insanity defense. Also, consider criteria psychologists
frequently use to determine whether a defendant is competent to stand trial or legally insane.
Review the Week 3 Application Case Study provided in this week’s Learning Resources
Search the Walden Library, and select one peer-reviewed article related to Competency to Stand Trial
and one peer-reviewed article related to the Insanity Defense.
The Assignment (3–5 pages):
Identify the main factors that are relevant to a defendant’s competence to stand trial and use of the
insanity defense.
Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances under
which the defendant in the case study might be found incompetent to stand trial.
Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances that
might warrant the insanity defense for the defendant.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
PSYC_2101_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric
Discuss why or why not the insanity defense might be successful in the case study.
Discuss why or why not the claim for incompetence to stand trial might be successful in this case.
Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You
are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this
course.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Criteria Ratings Pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
the main factors
that are relevant to
a defendant’s
competence to
stand trial and use
of the insanity
defense…. (20
points)
20 pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
circumstances
under which the
20 pts
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
Criteria Ratings Pts
defendant in the
case study might
be found
incompetent to
stand trial…. (20
points)
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
circumstances that
might warrant the
insanity defense for
the defendant….
(20 points)
20 pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
20 pts
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Criteria Ratings Pts
answer
accurate?…Discuss
why or why not the
insanity defense
might be
successful in the
case study…. (20
points)
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Discuss
why or why not the
claim for
incompetence to
stand trial might be
successful in this
case…. (20 points)
20 pts
Quality of Writing …
(15 points)
15 pts
when
necessary.
Resources
when
necessary.
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
A
Writing is clear
and organized
with few or no
errors in
mechanics,
usage,
grammar, or
spelling
(MUGS).
12 pts
B
Writing is
mostly clear
and organized
with few
MUGS errors.
Writing is
original (i.e.,
use of own
words and
10.5 pts
C
Writing is
somewhat
clear and
organized with
some MUGS
errors. Most
writing is
original (i.e.,
use of own
9 pts
D
Writing is
somewhat
unclear and
disorganized
and/or
contains
many MUGS
errors. There
is an overuse
0 pts
F
Writing is
unclear
and/or
disorganized
and/or
contains
many
MUGS
errors.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Information
documentation …(5
points)
5 pts
Total Points: 120
There is a
preponderance
of original
writing (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).
proper
paraphrasing).
words and
proper
paraphrasing).
of direct
quotations
and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing.
There is an
underuse of
original
writing and
an overuse
of directly
quoted
content.
5 pts
A
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
properly
documented
with
citation(s) and
reference(s).
3.5 pts
B
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
partially
documented
with
citation(s)
and/or
reference(s).
0 pts
C
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
not cited or
referenced in
any way.
0 pts
D
0 pts
F
**## Week3_Assignment11.pdf**
Due Apr 26 by 10:59pm
Points 120
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL AND THE
INSANITY DEFENSE
For this week’s Application, you analyze a case study and discuss if the insanity defense would be
successful and if the defendant would be found competent to stand trial.
To prepare:
Review Chapters 8 and 10 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology, and focus on the issues
surrounding competence to stand trial and the insanity defense. Also, consider criteria psychologists
frequently use to determine whether a defendant is competent to stand trial or legally insane.
Review the Week 3 Application Case Study provided in this week’s Learning Resources
Search the Walden Library, and select one peer-reviewed article related to Competency to Stand Trial
and one peer-reviewed article related to the Insanity Defense.
The Assignment (3–5 pages):
Identify the main factors that are relevant to a defendant’s competence to stand trial and use of the
insanity defense.
Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances under
which the defendant in the case study might be found incompetent to stand trial.
Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances that
might warrant the insanity defense for the defendant.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
PSYC_2101_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric
Discuss why or why not the insanity defense might be successful in the case study.
Discuss why or why not the claim for incompetence to stand trial might be successful in this case.
Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You
are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this
course.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Criteria Ratings Pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
the main factors
that are relevant to
a defendant’s
competence to
stand trial and use
of the insanity
defense…. (20
points)
20 pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
circumstances
under which the
20 pts
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
Criteria Ratings Pts
defendant in the
case study might
be found
incompetent to
stand trial…. (20
points)
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
circumstances that
might warrant the
insanity defense for
the defendant….
(20 points)
20 pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
20 pts
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Criteria Ratings Pts
answer
accurate?…Discuss
why or why not the
insanity defense
might be
successful in the
case study…. (20
points)
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Discuss
why or why not the
claim for
incompetence to
stand trial might be
successful in this
case…. (20 points)
20 pts
Quality of Writing …
(15 points)
15 pts
when
necessary.
Resources
when
necessary.
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
A
Writing is clear
and organized
with few or no
errors in
mechanics,
usage,
grammar, or
spelling
(MUGS).
12 pts
B
Writing is
mostly clear
and organized
with few
MUGS errors.
Writing is
original (i.e.,
use of own
words and
10.5 pts
C
Writing is
somewhat
clear and
organized with
some MUGS
errors. Most
writing is
original (i.e.,
use of own
9 pts
D
Writing is
somewhat
unclear and
disorganized
and/or
contains
many MUGS
errors. There
is an overuse
0 pts
F
Writing is
unclear
and/or
disorganized
and/or
contains
many
MUGS
errors.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Information
documentation …(5
points)
5 pts
Total Points: 120
There is a
preponderance
of original
writing (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).
proper
paraphrasing).
words and
proper
paraphrasing).
of direct
quotations
and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing.
There is an
underuse of
original
writing and
an overuse
of directly
quoted
content.
5 pts
A
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
properly
documented
with
citation(s) and
reference(s).
3.5 pts
B
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
partially
documented
with
citation(s)
and/or
reference(s).
0 pts
C
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
not cited or
referenced in
any way.
0 pts
D
0 pts
F
**## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf**
WEEK 3: AT A GLANCE
FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND THE COURT SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
Two parents who love their three school-age children are divorcing. The mother is a highly
compensated and successful business executive. The father, a stay-at-home dad, is involved
extensively in all daily aspects of the children’s lives. A conviction for drug dealing, possession,
and use during his third year at college has prevented him from securing well-paid employment.
Both parents want full custody of their children. What factors should the courts consider in this
matter? Should the children’s parental preferences be taken into account? Should they be
allowed to testify in their own custody case?
Consider a vastly different scenario. A 48-year-old high school basketball coach has been
accused of sexually assaulting several of his former male basketball players. Although he has
had no previous arrests, the actual assaults involved violent behavior, and victims reported that
they had been threatened with physical harm if they reported any of the incidents to authorities.
Should the coach be released after serving his sentence at a state penitentiary or be committed
to a specialized state-run treatment center for sex offenders? A forensic psychologist may be
asked to weigh in on these highly charged court cases.
In civil cases (non-criminal cases), forensic psychologists play a variety of roles. Examples of
their responsibilities include making custody recommendations and evaluating the "fitness" of
DISCUSSION
(https://w
ASSIGNMENT
(https://w
RESOURCES
(https://w
(https://cdn-
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/
1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
each parent to raise a child. In criminal cases, a forensic psychologist may conduct a risk
assessment of a convicted sex offender. The results of the assessment may be used to inform
the court as to whether the offender should be indefinitely committed to a psychiatric or
correctional facility or be released after serving his or her sentence.
In the criminal justice system, it is imperative that defendants understand what is happening,
from the moment of arrest to sentencing and punishment. Before a trial can even begin,
defendants must be competent to stand trial—meaning that they understand and appreciate the
nature of the charges against them, and they can assist their attorney in formulating a defense.
Once competency is established, the defendant has several plea options, including guilty, not
guilty, and not guilty by reason of insanity. Forensic psychologists are often called upon to
determine a defendant’s competency when in question, and to provide the court an ultimate
opinion regarding the defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense.
This week, you examine relevant factors related to child testimony in child custody and child
protection cases. You also evaluate risk assessment criteria in civil commitment cases for sex
offenders. You also complete an Application Assignment that focuses on the issues of
Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Students will:
Evaluate criteria concerning risk assessment in civil commitment cases for sex offenders (D)
Evaluate the use of forensic psychology as it applies to child custody disputes and parental
competence (D)
Analyze the concepts of Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense as they relate to
the trial process (A)
**## Week3_Assignment11.pdf**
Due Apr 26 by 10:59pm
Points 120
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL AND THE
INSANITY DEFENSE
For this week’s Application, you analyze a case study and discuss if the insanity defense would be
successful and if the defendant would be found competent to stand trial.
To prepare:
Review Chapters 8 and 10 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology, and focus on the issues
surrounding competence to stand trial and the insanity defense. Also, consider criteria psychologists
frequently use to determine whether a defendant is competent to stand trial or legally insane.
Review the Week 3 Application Case Study provided in this week’s Learning Resources
Search the Walden Library, and select one peer-reviewed article related to Competency to Stand Trial
and one peer-reviewed article related to the Insanity Defense.
The Assignment (3–5 pages):
Identify the main factors that are relevant to a defendant’s competence to stand trial and use of the
insanity defense.
Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances under
which the defendant in the case study might be found incompetent to stand trial.
Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances that
might warrant the insanity defense for the defendant.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
PSYC_2101_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric
Discuss why or why not the insanity defense might be successful in the case study.
Discuss why or why not the claim for incompetence to stand trial might be successful in this case.
Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You
are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this
course.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Criteria Ratings Pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
the main factors
that are relevant to
a defendant’s
competence to
stand trial and use
of the insanity
defense…. (20
points)
20 pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
circumstances
under which the
20 pts
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
Criteria Ratings Pts
defendant in the
case study might
be found
incompetent to
stand trial…. (20
points)
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
circumstances that
might warrant the
insanity defense for
the defendant….
(20 points)
20 pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
20 pts
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Criteria Ratings Pts
answer
accurate?…Discuss
why or why not the
insanity defense
might be
successful in the
case study…. (20
points)
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Discuss
why or why not the
claim for
incompetence to
stand trial might be
successful in this
case…. (20 points)
20 pts
Quality of Writing …
(15 points)
15 pts
when
necessary.
Resources
when
necessary.
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
A
Writing is clear
and organized
with few or no
errors in
mechanics,
usage,
grammar, or
spelling
(MUGS).
12 pts
B
Writing is
mostly clear
and organized
with few
MUGS errors.
Writing is
original (i.e.,
use of own
words and
10.5 pts
C
Writing is
somewhat
clear and
organized with
some MUGS
errors. Most
writing is
original (i.e.,
use of own
9 pts
D
Writing is
somewhat
unclear and
disorganized
and/or
contains
many MUGS
errors. There
is an overuse
0 pts
F
Writing is
unclear
and/or
disorganized
and/or
contains
many
MUGS
errors.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Information
documentation …(5
points)
5 pts
Total Points: 120
There is a
preponderance
of original
writing (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).
proper
paraphrasing).
words and
proper
paraphrasing).
of direct
quotations
and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing.
There is an
underuse of
original
writing and
an overuse
of directly
quoted
content.
5 pts
A
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
properly
documented
with
citation(s) and
reference(s).
3.5 pts
B
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
partially
documented
with
citation(s)
and/or
reference(s).
0 pts
C
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
not cited or
referenced in
any way.
0 pts
D
0 pts
F
**## Week3_AtaGlance_IntrotoForensicPsych-Spring2026.pdf**
WEEK 3: AT A GLANCE
FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND THE COURT SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
Two parents who love their three school-age children are divorcing. The mother is a highly
compensated and successful business executive. The father, a stay-at-home dad, is involved
extensively in all daily aspects of the children’s lives. A conviction for drug dealing, possession,
and use during his third year at college has prevented him from securing well-paid employment.
Both parents want full custody of their children. What factors should the courts consider in this
matter? Should the children’s parental preferences be taken into account? Should they be
allowed to testify in their own custody case?
Consider a vastly different scenario. A 48-year-old high school basketball coach has been
accused of sexually assaulting several of his former male basketball players. Although he has
had no previous arrests, the actual assaults involved violent behavior, and victims reported that
they had been threatened with physical harm if they reported any of the incidents to authorities.
Should the coach be released after serving his sentence at a state penitentiary or be committed
to a specialized state-run treatment center for sex offenders? A forensic psychologist may be
asked to weigh in on these highly charged court cases.
In civil cases (non-criminal cases), forensic psychologists play a variety of roles. Examples of
their responsibilities include making custody recommendations and evaluating the "fitness" of
DISCUSSION
(https://w
ASSIGNMENT
(https://w
RESOURCES
(https://w
(https://cdn-
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/
1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407842)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407844)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
[https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920×938/GettyLicense_91222902.jpg)
each parent to raise a child. In criminal cases, a forensic psychologist may conduct a risk
assessment of a convicted sex offender. The results of the assessment may be used to inform
the court as to whether the offender should be indefinitely committed to a psychiatric or
correctional facility or be released after serving his or her sentence.
In the criminal justice system, it is imperative that defendants understand what is happening,
from the moment of arrest to sentencing and punishment. Before a trial can even begin,
defendants must be competent to stand trial—meaning that they understand and appreciate the
nature of the charges against them, and they can assist their attorney in formulating a defense.
Once competency is established, the defendant has several plea options, including guilty, not
guilty, and not guilty by reason of insanity. Forensic psychologists are often called upon to
determine a defendant’s competency when in question, and to provide the court an ultimate
opinion regarding the defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense.
This week, you examine relevant factors related to child testimony in child custody and child
protection cases. You also evaluate risk assessment criteria in civil commitment cases for sex
offenders. You also complete an Application Assignment that focuses on the issues of
Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Students will:
Evaluate criteria concerning risk assessment in civil commitment cases for sex offenders (D)
Evaluate the use of forensic psychology as it applies to child custody disputes and parental
competence (D)
Analyze the concepts of Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense as they relate to
the trial process (A)
**## Week3_Assignment11.pdf**
Due Apr 26 by 10:59pm
Points 120
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL AND THE
INSANITY DEFENSE
For this week’s Application, you analyze a case study and discuss if the insanity defense would be
successful and if the defendant would be found competent to stand trial.
To prepare:
Review Chapters 8 and 10 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology, and focus on the issues
surrounding competence to stand trial and the insanity defense. Also, consider criteria psychologists
frequently use to determine whether a defendant is competent to stand trial or legally insane.
Review the Week 3 Application Case Study provided in this week’s Learning Resources
Search the Walden Library, and select one peer-reviewed article related to Competency to Stand Trial
and one peer-reviewed article related to the Insanity Defense.
The Assignment (3–5 pages):
Identify the main factors that are relevant to a defendant’s competence to stand trial and use of the
insanity defense.
Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances under
which the defendant in the case study might be found incompetent to stand trial.
Considering the Week 3 Application Case Study and your selected article, identify circumstances that
might warrant the insanity defense for the defendant.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407838)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407847)
PSYC_2101_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric
Discuss why or why not the insanity defense might be successful in the case study.
Discuss why or why not the claim for incompetence to stand trial might be successful in this case.
Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You
are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this
course.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your
draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Criteria Ratings Pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
the main factors
that are relevant to
a defendant’s
competence to
stand trial and use
of the insanity
defense…. (20
points)
20 pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
circumstances
under which the
20 pts
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
Criteria Ratings Pts
defendant in the
case study might
be found
incompetent to
stand trial…. (20
points)
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Identify
circumstances that
might warrant the
insanity defense for
the defendant….
(20 points)
20 pts
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
20 pts
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Criteria Ratings Pts
answer
accurate?…Discuss
why or why not the
insanity defense
might be
successful in the
case study…. (20
points)
Demonstration of
Knowledge. Did the
student fully
respond to each
Assignment
prompt? Do the
responses
demonstrate that
the student applied
and learned the
information or
skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Discuss
why or why not the
claim for
incompetence to
stand trial might be
successful in this
case…. (20 points)
20 pts
Quality of Writing …
(15 points)
15 pts
when
necessary.
Resources
when
necessary.
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
20 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
17 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
13 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.
15 pts
A
Writing is clear
and organized
with few or no
errors in
mechanics,
usage,
grammar, or
spelling
(MUGS).
12 pts
B
Writing is
mostly clear
and organized
with few
MUGS errors.
Writing is
original (i.e.,
use of own
words and
10.5 pts
C
Writing is
somewhat
clear and
organized with
some MUGS
errors. Most
writing is
original (i.e.,
use of own
9 pts
D
Writing is
somewhat
unclear and
disorganized
and/or
contains
many MUGS
errors. There
is an overuse
0 pts
F
Writing is
unclear
and/or
disorganized
and/or
contains
many
MUGS
errors.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Information
documentation …(5
points)
5 pts
Total Points: 120
There is a
preponderance
of original
writing (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).
proper
paraphrasing).
words and
proper
paraphrasing).
of direct
quotations
and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing.
There is an
underuse of
original
writing and
an overuse
of directly
quoted
content.
5 pts
A
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
properly
documented
with
citation(s) and
reference(s).
3.5 pts
B
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
partially
documented
with
citation(s)
and/or
reference(s).
0 pts
C
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
not cited or
referenced in
any way.
0 pts
D
0 pts
F
Leave a Reply