[Solved] Psychology Discussion/Assignment/Project

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Please go through this and let me know if you have any questions. Please no AI or ChatGPT. Need a good grade

**files (2)**

– ## Topic_Week5_Discussion7.pdf

– ## Week5_Assignment7.pdf

**## Topic_Week5_Discussion7.pdf**





To prepare for this Discussion:

Review Chapter 12 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology , and focus on the Trayvon
Martin case on pages 295–297.
Review the article by Clark et al. (2007), “Five Factor Model Personality Traits, Jury Selection,
and Case Outcomes in Criminal and Civil Cases.” Consider criteria typically used in selecting
juries.
Take the perspective of a jury consultant for the Trayvon Martin case.
Select one of the three roles (judge, defense attorney, or prosecuting attorney), and consider
the characteristics that you might look for in potential jurors.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post the person whose interests you represent as jury consultant (prosecution, defendant, or
judge). Then, describe two demographic and/or personality factors that you consider important
during jury selection. Finally, explain why those are factors that might be grounds for eliminating a
potential juror from the jury.

Support your post(s) with evidence from at least one Learning Resource. Be sure to identify what
source(s) you used, both in the body of your post(s) and with a reference at the end of your post(s).

Read a selection of your colleagues' postings.

Respond in one or more of the following ways:

Ask a probing question and provide insight into how you would answer your question, and
why.
Ask a probing question and provide the foundation, or rationale, for the question.
Expand on your colleague’s posting by offering a new perspective or insight.
Agree with a colleague and offer additional (new) supporting information for consideration.
Disagree with a colleague by respectfully discussing and supporting a different perspective.

Support your post(s) with evidence from at least one Learning Resource. Be sure to identify what
source(s) you used, both in the body of your post(s) and with a reference at the end of your post(s).

WEEKLY RESOURCES

(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

BY DAY 3

BY DAY 5

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

**## Week5_Assignment7.pdf**

Due May 10 by 10:59pm
Points 120
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

 Back to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

SYSTEM VARIABLES IN THE RONALD COTTON
CASE

This week, you will continue your exploration of estimator variables that might influence the reliability of eyewitness
testimony. There are also system variables that can influence the reliability of eyewitness testimony. System variables
include all eyewitness procedures and processes under the control of the criminal justice system, including jury
instructions and police lineups. Police have significant power to engage in practices that improve accuracy.

This Application Assignment is due by Day 7 of Week 5.

To prepare for this Assignment:

Review Chapter 6 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology . Focus on examples of system variables.
Consider how they might influence reliability of eyewitness identification.
Review the Wells and Olson article, “Eyewitness Testimony.” Focus on current findings in the literature regarding
system variables and their influence on eyewitness testimony.
Review the section on Ronald Cotton, pages 140–142 in Chapter 7 in your course text, Forensic and Legal
Psychology . Also, review the Ronald Cotton case study summary below. Based on these readings, identify
system variables that may have had an impact on the case.
Find and read a peer-reviewed article in the Walden Library about one of the system variables you have decided
to analyze. Consider the significance of the system variable you selected and its relevance to the case.

Case Study: Eyewitness Identification

Jennifer Thompson, a white female college student living in southeastern United States, was sexually
assaulted at knifepoint in her home in the middle of the night. During the attack, the lights remained off.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

PSYC_2101_Week_5_Assignment_Rubric

Case Study: Eyewitness Identification

Despite the darkness, Jennifer claimed to have studied the attacker’s face during the assault. Consequently,
she felt she was able to identify her assailant to authorities.

Shortly after the attack, Jennifer contacted police. Within hours, she helped law enforcement officials create
a composite sketch of her attacker. Within a week—after examining mug shots—she identified Ronald
Cotton, an African-American male, as the rapist. About 2 weeks later, the police arrested Mr. Cotton. Two
weeks later, at the police station, she identified Ronald Cotton in a live simultaneous lineup. She told
detectives she was 100% certain he was the assailant. During the trial, she clearly demonstrated her
confidence that it was Ronald Cotton, the defendant, who had sexually assaulted her.

The Assignment (3 pages minimum):

Provide an analysis of the Ronald Cotton case, and include the following:

Describe two system variables in the Ronald Cotton case.
Explain the significance of each system variable as it relates to the case.
Provide two recommendations to improve actions taken by the police related to eyewitness identification in the
Ronald Cotton case.

Explain the relevance of the peer-reviewed article you selected for your analysis of the Ronald Cotton case.

Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to
provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft,
access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Criteria Ratings Pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Describe
two system variables in the
Ronald Cotton case…. (25
points)

25 pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Explain
the significance of each
system variable as it relates to
the case…. (25 points)

25 pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?

25 pts

25 pts
A

Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B

Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C

Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D

Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F

Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;

Criteria Ratings Pts

Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Recommendations
to police in the Ronald Cotton
case….(25 points)

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Apply
peer-reviewed article to the
Ronald Cotton case….(25
points)

25 pts

Quality of Writing …(15 points) 15 pts

accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
A

Writing is clear
and organized
with few or no
errors in
mechanics,
usage,
grammar, or

12 pts
B

Writing is
mostly clear
and organized
with few
MUGS errors.
Writing is
original (i.e.,

10.5 pts
C

Writing is
somewhat
clear and
organized with
some MUGS
errors. Most
writing is

9 pts
D

Writing is
somewhat
unclear and
disorganized
and/or
contains
many MUGS

0 pts
F

Writing is
unclear
and/or
disorganized
and/or
contains
many

Criteria Ratings Pts

Information documentation …
(5 points)

5 pts

Total Points: 120

spelling
(MUGS).
There is a
preponderance
of original
writing (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

original (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

errors. There
is an overuse
of direct
quotations
and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing.

MUGS
errors.
There is an
underuse of
original
writing and
an overuse
of directly
quoted
content.

5 pts
A

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
properly
documented
with
citation(s) and
reference(s).

3.5 pts
B

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
partially
documented
with
citation(s)
and/or
reference(s).

0 pts
C

0 pts
D

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
not cited or
referenced in
any way.

0 pts
F

**## Week5_Assignment7.pdf**

Due May 10 by 10:59pm
Points 120
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

 Back to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

SYSTEM VARIABLES IN THE RONALD COTTON
CASE

This week, you will continue your exploration of estimator variables that might influence the reliability of eyewitness
testimony. There are also system variables that can influence the reliability of eyewitness testimony. System variables
include all eyewitness procedures and processes under the control of the criminal justice system, including jury
instructions and police lineups. Police have significant power to engage in practices that improve accuracy.

This Application Assignment is due by Day 7 of Week 5.

To prepare for this Assignment:

Review Chapter 6 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology . Focus on examples of system variables.
Consider how they might influence reliability of eyewitness identification.
Review the Wells and Olson article, “Eyewitness Testimony.” Focus on current findings in the literature regarding
system variables and their influence on eyewitness testimony.
Review the section on Ronald Cotton, pages 140–142 in Chapter 7 in your course text, Forensic and Legal
Psychology . Also, review the Ronald Cotton case study summary below. Based on these readings, identify
system variables that may have had an impact on the case.
Find and read a peer-reviewed article in the Walden Library about one of the system variables you have decided
to analyze. Consider the significance of the system variable you selected and its relevance to the case.

Case Study: Eyewitness Identification

Jennifer Thompson, a white female college student living in southeastern United States, was sexually
assaulted at knifepoint in her home in the middle of the night. During the attack, the lights remained off.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

PSYC_2101_Week_5_Assignment_Rubric

Case Study: Eyewitness Identification

Despite the darkness, Jennifer claimed to have studied the attacker’s face during the assault. Consequently,
she felt she was able to identify her assailant to authorities.

Shortly after the attack, Jennifer contacted police. Within hours, she helped law enforcement officials create
a composite sketch of her attacker. Within a week—after examining mug shots—she identified Ronald
Cotton, an African-American male, as the rapist. About 2 weeks later, the police arrested Mr. Cotton. Two
weeks later, at the police station, she identified Ronald Cotton in a live simultaneous lineup. She told
detectives she was 100% certain he was the assailant. During the trial, she clearly demonstrated her
confidence that it was Ronald Cotton, the defendant, who had sexually assaulted her.

The Assignment (3 pages minimum):

Provide an analysis of the Ronald Cotton case, and include the following:

Describe two system variables in the Ronald Cotton case.
Explain the significance of each system variable as it relates to the case.
Provide two recommendations to improve actions taken by the police related to eyewitness identification in the
Ronald Cotton case.

Explain the relevance of the peer-reviewed article you selected for your analysis of the Ronald Cotton case.

Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to
provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft,
access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Criteria Ratings Pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Describe
two system variables in the
Ronald Cotton case…. (25
points)

25 pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Explain
the significance of each
system variable as it relates to
the case…. (25 points)

25 pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?

25 pts

25 pts
A

Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B

Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C

Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D

Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F

Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;

Criteria Ratings Pts

Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Recommendations
to police in the Ronald Cotton
case….(25 points)

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Apply
peer-reviewed article to the
Ronald Cotton case….(25
points)

25 pts

Quality of Writing …(15 points) 15 pts

accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
A

Writing is clear
and organized
with few or no
errors in
mechanics,
usage,
grammar, or

12 pts
B

Writing is
mostly clear
and organized
with few
MUGS errors.
Writing is
original (i.e.,

10.5 pts
C

Writing is
somewhat
clear and
organized with
some MUGS
errors. Most
writing is

9 pts
D

Writing is
somewhat
unclear and
disorganized
and/or
contains
many MUGS

0 pts
F

Writing is
unclear
and/or
disorganized
and/or
contains
many

Criteria Ratings Pts

Information documentation …
(5 points)

5 pts

Total Points: 120

spelling
(MUGS).
There is a
preponderance
of original
writing (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

original (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

errors. There
is an overuse
of direct
quotations
and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing.

MUGS
errors.
There is an
underuse of
original
writing and
an overuse
of directly
quoted
content.

5 pts
A

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
properly
documented
with
citation(s) and
reference(s).

3.5 pts
B

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
partially
documented
with
citation(s)
and/or
reference(s).

0 pts
C

0 pts
D

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
not cited or
referenced in
any way.

0 pts
F

**## Topic_Week5_Discussion7.pdf**





To prepare for this Discussion:

Review Chapter 12 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology , and focus on the Trayvon
Martin case on pages 295–297.
Review the article by Clark et al. (2007), “Five Factor Model Personality Traits, Jury Selection,
and Case Outcomes in Criminal and Civil Cases.” Consider criteria typically used in selecting
juries.
Take the perspective of a jury consultant for the Trayvon Martin case.
Select one of the three roles (judge, defense attorney, or prosecuting attorney), and consider
the characteristics that you might look for in potential jurors.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post the person whose interests you represent as jury consultant (prosecution, defendant, or
judge). Then, describe two demographic and/or personality factors that you consider important
during jury selection. Finally, explain why those are factors that might be grounds for eliminating a
potential juror from the jury.

Support your post(s) with evidence from at least one Learning Resource. Be sure to identify what
source(s) you used, both in the body of your post(s) and with a reference at the end of your post(s).

Read a selection of your colleagues' postings.

Respond in one or more of the following ways:

Ask a probing question and provide insight into how you would answer your question, and
why.
Ask a probing question and provide the foundation, or rationale, for the question.
Expand on your colleague’s posting by offering a new perspective or insight.
Agree with a colleague and offer additional (new) supporting information for consideration.
Disagree with a colleague by respectfully discussing and supporting a different perspective.

Support your post(s) with evidence from at least one Learning Resource. Be sure to identify what
source(s) you used, both in the body of your post(s) and with a reference at the end of your post(s).

WEEKLY RESOURCES

(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

BY DAY 3

BY DAY 5

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

**## Week5_Assignment7.pdf**

Due May 10 by 10:59pm
Points 120
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

 Back to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

SYSTEM VARIABLES IN THE RONALD COTTON
CASE

This week, you will continue your exploration of estimator variables that might influence the reliability of eyewitness
testimony. There are also system variables that can influence the reliability of eyewitness testimony. System variables
include all eyewitness procedures and processes under the control of the criminal justice system, including jury
instructions and police lineups. Police have significant power to engage in practices that improve accuracy.

This Application Assignment is due by Day 7 of Week 5.

To prepare for this Assignment:

Review Chapter 6 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology . Focus on examples of system variables.
Consider how they might influence reliability of eyewitness identification.
Review the Wells and Olson article, “Eyewitness Testimony.” Focus on current findings in the literature regarding
system variables and their influence on eyewitness testimony.
Review the section on Ronald Cotton, pages 140–142 in Chapter 7 in your course text, Forensic and Legal
Psychology . Also, review the Ronald Cotton case study summary below. Based on these readings, identify
system variables that may have had an impact on the case.
Find and read a peer-reviewed article in the Walden Library about one of the system variables you have decided
to analyze. Consider the significance of the system variable you selected and its relevance to the case.

Case Study: Eyewitness Identification

Jennifer Thompson, a white female college student living in southeastern United States, was sexually
assaulted at knifepoint in her home in the middle of the night. During the attack, the lights remained off.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

PSYC_2101_Week_5_Assignment_Rubric

Case Study: Eyewitness Identification

Despite the darkness, Jennifer claimed to have studied the attacker’s face during the assault. Consequently,
she felt she was able to identify her assailant to authorities.

Shortly after the attack, Jennifer contacted police. Within hours, she helped law enforcement officials create
a composite sketch of her attacker. Within a week—after examining mug shots—she identified Ronald
Cotton, an African-American male, as the rapist. About 2 weeks later, the police arrested Mr. Cotton. Two
weeks later, at the police station, she identified Ronald Cotton in a live simultaneous lineup. She told
detectives she was 100% certain he was the assailant. During the trial, she clearly demonstrated her
confidence that it was Ronald Cotton, the defendant, who had sexually assaulted her.

The Assignment (3 pages minimum):

Provide an analysis of the Ronald Cotton case, and include the following:

Describe two system variables in the Ronald Cotton case.
Explain the significance of each system variable as it relates to the case.
Provide two recommendations to improve actions taken by the police related to eyewitness identification in the
Ronald Cotton case.

Explain the relevance of the peer-reviewed article you selected for your analysis of the Ronald Cotton case.

Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to
provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft,
access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Criteria Ratings Pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Describe
two system variables in the
Ronald Cotton case…. (25
points)

25 pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Explain
the significance of each
system variable as it relates to
the case…. (25 points)

25 pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?

25 pts

25 pts
A

Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B

Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C

Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D

Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F

Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;

Criteria Ratings Pts

Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Recommendations
to police in the Ronald Cotton
case….(25 points)

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Apply
peer-reviewed article to the
Ronald Cotton case….(25
points)

25 pts

Quality of Writing …(15 points) 15 pts

accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
A

Writing is clear
and organized
with few or no
errors in
mechanics,
usage,
grammar, or

12 pts
B

Writing is
mostly clear
and organized
with few
MUGS errors.
Writing is
original (i.e.,

10.5 pts
C

Writing is
somewhat
clear and
organized with
some MUGS
errors. Most
writing is

9 pts
D

Writing is
somewhat
unclear and
disorganized
and/or
contains
many MUGS

0 pts
F

Writing is
unclear
and/or
disorganized
and/or
contains
many

Criteria Ratings Pts

Information documentation …
(5 points)

5 pts

Total Points: 120

spelling
(MUGS).
There is a
preponderance
of original
writing (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

original (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

errors. There
is an overuse
of direct
quotations
and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing.

MUGS
errors.
There is an
underuse of
original
writing and
an overuse
of directly
quoted
content.

5 pts
A

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
properly
documented
with
citation(s) and
reference(s).

3.5 pts
B

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
partially
documented
with
citation(s)
and/or
reference(s).

0 pts
C

0 pts
D

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
not cited or
referenced in
any way.

0 pts
F

**## Topic_Week5_Discussion7.pdf**





To prepare for this Discussion:

Review Chapter 12 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology , and focus on the Trayvon
Martin case on pages 295–297.
Review the article by Clark et al. (2007), “Five Factor Model Personality Traits, Jury Selection,
and Case Outcomes in Criminal and Civil Cases.” Consider criteria typically used in selecting
juries.
Take the perspective of a jury consultant for the Trayvon Martin case.
Select one of the three roles (judge, defense attorney, or prosecuting attorney), and consider
the characteristics that you might look for in potential jurors.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post the person whose interests you represent as jury consultant (prosecution, defendant, or
judge). Then, describe two demographic and/or personality factors that you consider important
during jury selection. Finally, explain why those are factors that might be grounds for eliminating a
potential juror from the jury.

Support your post(s) with evidence from at least one Learning Resource. Be sure to identify what
source(s) you used, both in the body of your post(s) and with a reference at the end of your post(s).

Read a selection of your colleagues' postings.

Respond in one or more of the following ways:

Ask a probing question and provide insight into how you would answer your question, and
why.
Ask a probing question and provide the foundation, or rationale, for the question.
Expand on your colleague’s posting by offering a new perspective or insight.
Agree with a colleague and offer additional (new) supporting information for consideration.
Disagree with a colleague by respectfully discussing and supporting a different perspective.

Support your post(s) with evidence from at least one Learning Resource. Be sure to identify what
source(s) you used, both in the body of your post(s) and with a reference at the end of your post(s).

WEEKLY RESOURCES

(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

BY DAY 3

BY DAY 5

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

**## Week5_Assignment7.pdf**

Due May 10 by 10:59pm
Points 120
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

 Back to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

SYSTEM VARIABLES IN THE RONALD COTTON
CASE

This week, you will continue your exploration of estimator variables that might influence the reliability of eyewitness
testimony. There are also system variables that can influence the reliability of eyewitness testimony. System variables
include all eyewitness procedures and processes under the control of the criminal justice system, including jury
instructions and police lineups. Police have significant power to engage in practices that improve accuracy.

This Application Assignment is due by Day 7 of Week 5.

To prepare for this Assignment:

Review Chapter 6 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology . Focus on examples of system variables.
Consider how they might influence reliability of eyewitness identification.
Review the Wells and Olson article, “Eyewitness Testimony.” Focus on current findings in the literature regarding
system variables and their influence on eyewitness testimony.
Review the section on Ronald Cotton, pages 140–142 in Chapter 7 in your course text, Forensic and Legal
Psychology . Also, review the Ronald Cotton case study summary below. Based on these readings, identify
system variables that may have had an impact on the case.
Find and read a peer-reviewed article in the Walden Library about one of the system variables you have decided
to analyze. Consider the significance of the system variable you selected and its relevance to the case.

Case Study: Eyewitness Identification

Jennifer Thompson, a white female college student living in southeastern United States, was sexually
assaulted at knifepoint in her home in the middle of the night. During the attack, the lights remained off.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407878)

[https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/220454/modules/items/9407891)

PSYC_2101_Week_5_Assignment_Rubric

Case Study: Eyewitness Identification

Despite the darkness, Jennifer claimed to have studied the attacker’s face during the assault. Consequently,
she felt she was able to identify her assailant to authorities.

Shortly after the attack, Jennifer contacted police. Within hours, she helped law enforcement officials create
a composite sketch of her attacker. Within a week—after examining mug shots—she identified Ronald
Cotton, an African-American male, as the rapist. About 2 weeks later, the police arrested Mr. Cotton. Two
weeks later, at the police station, she identified Ronald Cotton in a live simultaneous lineup. She told
detectives she was 100% certain he was the assailant. During the trial, she clearly demonstrated her
confidence that it was Ronald Cotton, the defendant, who had sexually assaulted her.

The Assignment (3 pages minimum):

Provide an analysis of the Ronald Cotton case, and include the following:

Describe two system variables in the Ronald Cotton case.
Explain the significance of each system variable as it relates to the case.
Provide two recommendations to improve actions taken by the police related to eyewitness identification in the
Ronald Cotton case.

Explain the relevance of the peer-reviewed article you selected for your analysis of the Ronald Cotton case.

Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to
provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft,
access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Criteria Ratings Pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Describe
two system variables in the
Ronald Cotton case…. (25
points)

25 pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Explain
the significance of each
system variable as it relates to
the case…. (25 points)

25 pts

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?

25 pts

25 pts
A

Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B

Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C

Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D

Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F

Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;

Criteria Ratings Pts

Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer
accurate?…Recommendations
to police in the Ronald Cotton
case….(25 points)

Demonstration of Knowledge.
Did the student fully respond
to each Assignment prompt?
Do the responses
demonstrate that the student
applied and learned the
information or skills? Is the
answer accurate?…Apply
peer-reviewed article to the
Ronald Cotton case….(25
points)

25 pts

Quality of Writing …(15 points) 15 pts

accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

25 pts
A
Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

21 pts
B
Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains
some details
and/or
explanation;
includes
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

17.5 pts
C
Response is
somewhat
complete
and/or is
somewhat
inaccurate;
and/or does
not contain
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
some
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
D
Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

0 pts
F
Response is
incomplete;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained; no
supporting
information
from the
Learning
Resources
when
necessary.

15 pts
A

Writing is clear
and organized
with few or no
errors in
mechanics,
usage,
grammar, or

12 pts
B

Writing is
mostly clear
and organized
with few
MUGS errors.
Writing is
original (i.e.,

10.5 pts
C

Writing is
somewhat
clear and
organized with
some MUGS
errors. Most
writing is

9 pts
D

Writing is
somewhat
unclear and
disorganized
and/or
contains
many MUGS

0 pts
F

Writing is
unclear
and/or
disorganized
and/or
contains
many

Criteria Ratings Pts

Information documentation …
(5 points)

5 pts

Total Points: 120

spelling
(MUGS).
There is a
preponderance
of original
writing (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

original (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).

errors. There
is an overuse
of direct
quotations
and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing.

MUGS
errors.
There is an
underuse of
original
writing and
an overuse
of directly
quoted
content.

5 pts
A

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
properly
documented
with
citation(s) and
reference(s).

3.5 pts
B

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
partially
documented
with
citation(s)
and/or
reference(s).

0 pts
C

0 pts
D

Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
not cited or
referenced in
any way.

0 pts
F