[Solved] META-ANALYSES

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

3 PAGES

APA FORMATE

PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTION AND RUBRICS IN THE ATTACHED

**files (6)**

– ## wk8epidemiologyassign.docx

– Community-engaged-service-in-pathophysiology-an_2020_Journal-of-Professional.pdf
– Academic-Practice-Partnerships–Building-a-sustainable-_2020_Journal-of-Prof.pdf
– Development-of-a-DNP-measurement-grid-to-increase-the-rigo_2020_Journal-of-P.pdf
– Empathic-and-listening-styles-of-first-year-undergradu_2020_Journal-of-Profe.pdf
– Doctor-of-nursing-practice-students–perceptions-of-p_2020_Journal-of-Profes.pdf

**## wk8epidemiologyassign.docx**

In epidemiology, meta-analyses are becoming a common research design. They are also “the most frequently cited form of clinical research,” and as such are an important type of study for the advanced practice nurse to be familiar with (Haidich, 2010).

For this Assignment, you will analyze a meta-analysis article and consider the implications of this research design for nursing practice, building on this week’s Discussion.

Reference:

TO PREPARE:

· Using the Walden Library, locate a peer-reviewed article that utilizes a meta-analysis design and examines a population health topic that interests you. Your article must be a meta-analysis specifically, not just a systematic review.

THE ASSIGNMENT:

In 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:

· Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis.

· Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not.

· Do you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not.

· Explain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice.

RUBRICS

**NURS_8310_Week8_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8310_Week8_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The article is clearly identified. The response accurately, clearly, and concisely explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The article is clearly identified. The response accurately explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The article is identified. The response somewhat inaccurately or vaguely explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the article and explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWere the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response provides an accurate, clear, and concise explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. A critique of the researcher’s approach with strong rationale is included.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response provides an accurate explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. A critique of the researcher’s approach with rationale is included.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response provides a somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. Critique of the researcher’s approach is somewhat vague, or rationale is inadequate.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response provides an inaccurate and vague explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected or is missing. Critique of the researcher’s approach is vague, inaccurate, unsupported, or missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDo you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** A clear and concise critique of the study’s conclusions that demonstrates strong critical thinking is provided.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** A clear critique of the study’s conclusions that demonstrates some critical thinking is provided.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** A somewhat inaccurate or vague critique of the study’s conclusions is provided.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** An inaccurate and vague critique of the study’s conclusions is provided, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** An accurate and detailed explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** An accurate explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** A somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** An inaccurate and vague explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided, or it is missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

**Community-engaged-service-in-pathophysiology-an_2020_Journal-of-Professional.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/community-engaged-service-in-pathophysiology-an-2020-journal-of-professional-pdf)

**Academic-Practice-Partnerships–Building-a-sustainable-_2020_Journal-of-Prof.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/academic-practice-partnerships-building-a-sustainable-2020-journal-of-prof-pdf)

**Development-of-a-DNP-measurement-grid-to-increase-the-rigo_2020_Journal-of-P.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/development-of-a-dnp-measurement-grid-to-increase-the-rigo-2020-journal-of-p-pdf-10533545)

**Empathic-and-listening-styles-of-first-year-undergradu_2020_Journal-of-Profe.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/empathic-and-listening-styles-of-first-year-undergradu-2020-journal-of-profe-pdf)

**Doctor-of-nursing-practice-students–perceptions-of-p_2020_Journal-of-Profes.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/doctor-of-nursing-practice-students-perceptions-of-p-2020-journal-of-profes-pdf)

**Doctor-of-nursing-practice-students–perceptions-of-p_2020_Journal-of-Profes.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/doctor-of-nursing-practice-students-perceptions-of-p-2020-journal-of-profes-pdf)

**## wk8epidemiologyassign.docx**

In epidemiology, meta-analyses are becoming a common research design. They are also “the most frequently cited form of clinical research,” and as such are an important type of study for the advanced practice nurse to be familiar with (Haidich, 2010).

For this Assignment, you will analyze a meta-analysis article and consider the implications of this research design for nursing practice, building on this week’s Discussion.

Reference:

TO PREPARE:

· Using the Walden Library, locate a peer-reviewed article that utilizes a meta-analysis design and examines a population health topic that interests you. Your article must be a meta-analysis specifically, not just a systematic review.

THE ASSIGNMENT:

In 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:

· Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis.

· Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not.

· Do you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not.

· Explain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice.

RUBRICS

**NURS_8310_Week8_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8310_Week8_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The article is clearly identified. The response accurately, clearly, and concisely explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The article is clearly identified. The response accurately explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The article is identified. The response somewhat inaccurately or vaguely explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the article and explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWere the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response provides an accurate, clear, and concise explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. A critique of the researcher’s approach with strong rationale is included.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response provides an accurate explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. A critique of the researcher’s approach with rationale is included.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response provides a somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. Critique of the researcher’s approach is somewhat vague, or rationale is inadequate.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response provides an inaccurate and vague explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected or is missing. Critique of the researcher’s approach is vague, inaccurate, unsupported, or missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDo you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** A clear and concise critique of the study’s conclusions that demonstrates strong critical thinking is provided.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** A clear critique of the study’s conclusions that demonstrates some critical thinking is provided.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** A somewhat inaccurate or vague critique of the study’s conclusions is provided.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** An inaccurate and vague critique of the study’s conclusions is provided, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** An accurate and detailed explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** An accurate explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** A somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** An inaccurate and vague explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided, or it is missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

**Community-engaged-service-in-pathophysiology-an_2020_Journal-of-Professional.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/community-engaged-service-in-pathophysiology-an-2020-journal-of-professional-pdf)

**Academic-Practice-Partnerships–Building-a-sustainable-_2020_Journal-of-Prof.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/academic-practice-partnerships-building-a-sustainable-2020-journal-of-prof-pdf)

**Development-of-a-DNP-measurement-grid-to-increase-the-rigo_2020_Journal-of-P.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/development-of-a-dnp-measurement-grid-to-increase-the-rigo-2020-journal-of-p-pdf-10533545)

**Empathic-and-listening-styles-of-first-year-undergradu_2020_Journal-of-Profe.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/empathic-and-listening-styles-of-first-year-undergradu-2020-journal-of-profe-pdf)

**Doctor-of-nursing-practice-students–perceptions-of-p_2020_Journal-of-Profes.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/doctor-of-nursing-practice-students-perceptions-of-p-2020-journal-of-profes-pdf)

**## wk8epidemiologyassign.docx**

In epidemiology, meta-analyses are becoming a common research design. They are also “the most frequently cited form of clinical research,” and as such are an important type of study for the advanced practice nurse to be familiar with (Haidich, 2010).

For this Assignment, you will analyze a meta-analysis article and consider the implications of this research design for nursing practice, building on this week’s Discussion.

Reference:

TO PREPARE:

· Using the Walden Library, locate a peer-reviewed article that utilizes a meta-analysis design and examines a population health topic that interests you. Your article must be a meta-analysis specifically, not just a systematic review.

THE ASSIGNMENT:

In 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:

· Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis.

· Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not.

· Do you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not.

· Explain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice.

RUBRICS

**NURS_8310_Week8_Assignment_Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| NURS_8310_Week8_Assignment_Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The article is clearly identified. The response accurately, clearly, and concisely explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The article is clearly identified. The response accurately explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The article is identified. The response somewhat inaccurately or vaguely explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the article and explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWere the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** The response provides an accurate, clear, and concise explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. A critique of the researcher’s approach with strong rationale is included.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** The response provides an accurate explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. A critique of the researcher’s approach with rationale is included.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** The response provides a somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. Critique of the researcher’s approach is somewhat vague, or rationale is inadequate.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** The response provides an inaccurate and vague explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected or is missing. Critique of the researcher’s approach is vague, inaccurate, unsupported, or missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDo you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not. | **20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent** A clear and concise critique of the study’s conclusions that demonstrates strong critical thinking is provided.<br> <br>**17 to >15.0 ptsGood** A clear critique of the study’s conclusions that demonstrates some critical thinking is provided.<br> <br>**15 to >13.0 ptsFair** A somewhat inaccurate or vague critique of the study’s conclusions is provided.<br> <br>**13 to >0 ptsPoor** An inaccurate and vague critique of the study’s conclusions is provided, or it is missing. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice. | **25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent** An accurate and detailed explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.<br> <br>**22 to >19.0 ptsGood** An accurate explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.<br> <br>**19 to >17.0 ptsFair** A somewhat inaccurate or vague explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.<br> <br>**17 to >0 ptsPoor** An inaccurate and vague explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided, or it is missing. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

Total Points: 100

**Community-engaged-service-in-pathophysiology-an_2020_Journal-of-Professional.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/community-engaged-service-in-pathophysiology-an-2020-journal-of-professional-pdf)

**Academic-Practice-Partnerships–Building-a-sustainable-_2020_Journal-of-Prof.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/academic-practice-partnerships-building-a-sustainable-2020-journal-of-prof-pdf)

**Development-of-a-DNP-measurement-grid-to-increase-the-rigo_2020_Journal-of-P.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/development-of-a-dnp-measurement-grid-to-increase-the-rigo-2020-journal-of-p-pdf-10533545)

**Empathic-and-listening-styles-of-first-year-undergradu_2020_Journal-of-Profe.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/empathic-and-listening-styles-of-first-year-undergradu-2020-journal-of-profe-pdf)

**Doctor-of-nursing-practice-students–perceptions-of-p_2020_Journal-of-Profes.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/doctor-of-nursing-practice-students-perceptions-of-p-2020-journal-of-profes-pdf)