Executive Solution Overview
**files (1)** – ## Untitleddocument46.pdf **## Untitleddocument46.pdf** Write as a freshman in college style and Use 4 sources Use this topic Should the U.S. government forgive federal student loan debt for low-income borrowers? I would choose this topic because it focuses on a specific group of peo…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (1)**
– ## Untitleddocument46.pdf
**## Untitleddocument46.pdf**
Write as a freshman in college style and Use 4 sources
Use this topic
Should the U.S. government forgive federal student loan debt for low-income
borrowers?
I would choose this topic because it focuses on a specific group of people, making it
more detailed and easier to analyze both sides clearly. It is also a highly relevant issue
that affects many students financially, which makes it meaningful to research and
discuss in a balanced way.
This week, you will submit an annotated bibliography.
Your annotated bibliography consists of four annotated sources; two for each side of the
debatable topic. For each source, include:
● An APA style formatted entry for each source
● A summary: What is the main message of this source?
● Evaluation: Why is this a credible source? Why is this author credible?
● Relevance: How will this source contribute to your research?
● Quote: Write down a quote from this source that you plan to use in your
informative paper.
Informative Paper full instructions
https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?wrap=1
Download Informative Paper full instructions
See the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Resource: Use the Grammarly tool to catch and correct mistakes in your writing
assignments.
Points: 75
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Rubric
Informative Paper Annotated Bibliography
[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?wrap=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?wrap=1)
[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?download_frd=1)
[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?download_frd=1)
[https://guides.westcoastuniversity.edu/grammarly](https://guides.westcoastuniversity.edu/grammarly)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome
Content
22.5 to >20.02 ptsExceeds ExpectationsFour appropriate sources are
identified. Sources are highly relevant to the topic and add greatly to research
potential. The writer makes minimal (if any) errors in APA style format.
20.02 to >17.78 ptsMeets ExpectationsFour appropriate sources are
identified. Sources are relevant to the topic. The writer makes some errors in
APA style format.
17.78 to >16.2 ptsApproaches ExpectationsFour sources are identified.
One or more sources may not be relevant to the topic. The writer makes
numerous errors in APA style format.
16.2 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsFewer than four sources are
identified. One or more sources are not relevant to the topic. APA style
formatting is missing.
22.5
pts
This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome
Annotatio
ns
22.5 to >20.02 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAll main/critical points of the
research study are included for each annotation. Annotations succinctly and
comprehensively describe the source material.
20.02 to >17.78 ptsMeets ExpectationsMain/critical points of the source
material are included but may be lacking in detail for each annotation. Most
annotations are succinct and generally describe the source material.
17.78 to >16.2 ptsApproaches ExpectationsMain/critical points of the
chosen sources lack detail. Some annotations generally describe the source
material.
16.2 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsMain/critical points of sources are
absent or significantly lacking in detail. Some annotations may be missing.
22.5
pts
This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome
Evaluatio
n
22.5 to >20.02 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAn evaluation of each source
clearly explains why the it was chosen and thoroughly identifies the relevance
to the topic.
20.02 to >17.78 ptsMeets ExpectationsEvaluation generally explains why
the sources were chosen and identifies their degree of relevance to the topic.
17.78 to >16.2 ptsApproaches ExpectationsEvaluation may fail to explain
why sources were chosen or identify their degree of relevance to the topic.
16.2 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsEvaluation neglects to explain
why the sources were chosen or to identify their degree of relevance to the
topic.
22.5
pts
This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome
Quote
7.5 to >6.68 ptsExceeds ExpectationsA highly appropriate quote is
identified for each source.
6.68 to >5.93 ptsMeets ExpectationsAn appropriate quote is identified for
each source.
5.93 to >5.4 ptsApproaches ExpectationsQuotes are identified for each
source.
5.4 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsQuotes are missing for chosen
sources.
7.5
pts
Total Points: 75
– Rubric
**## Untitleddocument46.pdf**
Write as a freshman in college style and Use 4 sources
Use this topic
Should the U.S. government forgive federal student loan debt for low-income
borrowers?
I would choose this topic because it focuses on a specific group of people, making it
more detailed and easier to analyze both sides clearly. It is also a highly relevant issue
that affects many students financially, which makes it meaningful to research and
discuss in a balanced way.
This week, you will submit an annotated bibliography.
Your annotated bibliography consists of four annotated sources; two for each side of the
debatable topic. For each source, include:
● An APA style formatted entry for each source
● A summary: What is the main message of this source?
● Evaluation: Why is this a credible source? Why is this author credible?
● Relevance: How will this source contribute to your research?
● Quote: Write down a quote from this source that you plan to use in your
informative paper.
Informative Paper full instructions
https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?wrap=1
Download Informative Paper full instructions
See the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Resource: Use the Grammarly tool to catch and correct mistakes in your writing
assignments.
Points: 75
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Rubric
Informative Paper Annotated Bibliography
[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?wrap=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?wrap=1)
[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?download_frd=1)
[https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?download_frd=1](https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/75388/files/32859038/download?download_frd=1)
[https://guides.westcoastuniversity.edu/grammarly](https://guides.westcoastuniversity.edu/grammarly)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome
Content
22.5 to >20.02 ptsExceeds ExpectationsFour appropriate sources are
identified. Sources are highly relevant to the topic and add greatly to research
potential. The writer makes minimal (if any) errors in APA style format.
20.02 to >17.78 ptsMeets ExpectationsFour appropriate sources are
identified. Sources are relevant to the topic. The writer makes some errors in
APA style format.
17.78 to >16.2 ptsApproaches ExpectationsFour sources are identified.
One or more sources may not be relevant to the topic. The writer makes
numerous errors in APA style format.
16.2 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsFewer than four sources are
identified. One or more sources are not relevant to the topic. APA style
formatting is missing.
22.5
pts
This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome
Annotatio
ns
22.5 to >20.02 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAll main/critical points of the
research study are included for each annotation. Annotations succinctly and
comprehensively describe the source material.
20.02 to >17.78 ptsMeets ExpectationsMain/critical points of the source
material are included but may be lacking in detail for each annotation. Most
annotations are succinct and generally describe the source material.
17.78 to >16.2 ptsApproaches ExpectationsMain/critical points of the
chosen sources lack detail. Some annotations generally describe the source
material.
16.2 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsMain/critical points of sources are
absent or significantly lacking in detail. Some annotations may be missing.
22.5
pts
This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome
Evaluatio
n
22.5 to >20.02 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAn evaluation of each source
clearly explains why the it was chosen and thoroughly identifies the relevance
to the topic.
20.02 to >17.78 ptsMeets ExpectationsEvaluation generally explains why
the sources were chosen and identifies their degree of relevance to the topic.
17.78 to >16.2 ptsApproaches ExpectationsEvaluation may fail to explain
why sources were chosen or identify their degree of relevance to the topic.
16.2 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsEvaluation neglects to explain
why the sources were chosen or to identify their degree of relevance to the
topic.
22.5
pts
This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome
Quote
7.5 to >6.68 ptsExceeds ExpectationsA highly appropriate quote is
identified for each source.
6.68 to >5.93 ptsMeets ExpectationsAn appropriate quote is identified for
each source.
5.93 to >5.4 ptsApproaches ExpectationsQuotes are identified for each
source.
5.4 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsQuotes are missing for chosen
sources.
7.5
pts
Total Points: 75
– Rubric
Leave a Reply