Category: Environmental science

  • [Solved] OSHA 2 WK 4 JL

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached **files (2)** – ## UnitIVJournal.docx – ## UnitIVStudyGuide.pdf **## UnitIVJournal.docx** Unit IV Journal What is the OSHA situation in your state? Is there a state-run agency, or does the federal agency handle issues? Do you think it is the best approach, and how does it affect you? Yo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## UnitIVJournal.docx

    – ## UnitIVStudyGuide.pdf

    **## UnitIVJournal.docx**

    Unit IV Journal

    What is the OSHA situation in your state? Is there a state-run agency, or does the federal agency handle issues? Do you think it is the best approach, and how does it affect you?

    Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

    **## UnitIVStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    2. Discuss the primary responsibilities of environmental health and safety regulatory agencies.
    2.1 Describe responsibilities of safety and health regulatory agencies.

    5. Discuss the various roles states play in implementing laws and regulations.

    5.1 Discuss the roles states play in implementing Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) laws and regulations.

    5.2 Differentiate between state-run OSHA agencies and federal OSHA.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. United States Department

    of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018). All about OSHA (OSHA Publication No. 3302-08R).

    U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018). Employer rights and responsibilities following a

    federal OSHA inspection (OSHA Publication No. 3000-04R). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    Introduction

    Welcome to Unit IV! In this unit, we will be discussing the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) and how it operates. We will also be considering the role that states play in implementing federal
    OSHA mandates and regulations. Finally, this unit will present information on the OSHA enforcement
    inspection process and what an employer can expect from an OSHA inspection and actions that can be taken
    to minimize the impact of proposed penalties.

    As you should have been able to determine by now, OSHA is an agency that not only has the responsibility of
    promulgating safety and health standards through the rulemaking process, but it also enforcing those
    standards after they are in place. We already covered the rulemaking process in Unit I of this course. In this
    unit, we will focus more extensively on OSHA’s enforcement role.

    OSHA is prevalent in all 50 states in one fashion or another. In most states, OSHA has a federal enforcement
    presence, meaning that they have one or more area offices that cover workplaces in the state. These area
    offices are typically headed by an area director who oversees the area office that is typically made up of a
    number of compliance safety and health officers (CSHOs). Typically, the team or teams of CSHOs are
    comprised of safety specialists and industrial hygienists. Some larger offices may also employ a safety
    engineer, and many have one or more compliance assistance specialist.

    Recall from Unit I, however, that the OSH Act allowed states to run their own OSHA if a given state preferred
    to do so. OSHA provides funding for 50% of the cost of running these state-level programs. As of 2019, there
    are 22 states that currently have their own OSHA (OSHA, n.d.). These OSHA programs are required to be at

    UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
    OSHA Enforcement and
    Jurisdictional Issues

    [https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs](https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    least as effective as the federal OSHA rules, promulgate their own standards, and enforce those standards in
    a fashion similar to the federal OSHA. States are also required to have jurisdiction over both public and
    private employers. This is different from the federal OSHA, which has jurisdiction over only private industry
    according to the act, and federal agencies, according to an executive order. Thus, in a federal OSHA state, it
    is up to the state to decide how to protect employees of the state and employees of its political subdivisions,
    such as counties, cities, and school districts (OSHA, n.d.).

    The primary role of the area office (whether a state or federal OSHA office) is essentially to enforce OSHA
    standards by conducting inspections to determine if organizations working within the jurisdiction are following
    OSHA’s standards or otherwise providing a workplace that is free from recognized hazards. Inspections can
    be conducted for a number of reasons. When it comes to prioritizing inspections, OSHA has given reports of
    imminent danger the number one ranking. This is because of the likelihood that someone may be injured and
    needs to be removed from the hazard as soon as possible. Next in line on the priority list includes reports of
    severe injuries and illnesses including fatalities, amputations, loss of an eye, or hospitalizations (Goetsch,
    2018).

    Next on the priority list are formal employee complaints and referrals. Formal complaints need to be signed by
    a current employee of the organization or an appropriate representative. Referrals typically come from an
    individual who is working in some sort of official capacity who brings a workplace hazard to the attention of
    OSHA. An example might include a physician calling the OSHA office to indicate that employees who work for
    a car battery remanufacturing plant have very high blood lead levels. Referrals can be taken from news media
    reports as well. Another type of referral is a within office referral in which a compliance officer makes a referral
    to a separate discipline or identifies a hazard from a public access way (Goetsch, 2018).

    Programmed planned inspections are a bit different from those described previously in that OSHA typically
    develops a program for accessing facilities and worksites in which it can be reasonably assumed that a
    hazard exists. The rationale and the policies and procedures are typically described in compliance directives
    known as emphasis programs. The last type of inspection on the priority list that OSHA conducts is the follow-
    up or monitoring inspection. These inspections are conducted to make sure employers have abated a given
    hazard or that they are proceeding toward abatement based on their agreement with OSHA.

    Inspections

    When OSHA conducts inspections, they typically show up unannounced. The CSHO will show the employer’s
    representative his or her credentials and hold an opening conference explaining the scope and purpose of the
    inspection and on overview of what it entails. The scope of the inspection can vary from looking at a few
    complaint items and routine review of a few programs the employer is required to maintain, to a full-blown
    wall-to-wall comprehensive inspection. Typically, the latter type of inspection is tied to a programmed
    inspection resulting from one of OSHA’s emphasis programs. OSHA, of course, needs permission to conduct
    the inspection from the employer who can deny access. When this occurs, OSHA will need to obtain a
    warrant to gain access to the facility. Warrants can be obtained within a day if it is urgent for OSHA to gain
    access, but the process typically takes several days or more before OSHA returns to the facility (OSHA,
    2018a).

    Walk-around

    The next part of the inspection process is often referred to as the walk-around and involves going into the
    facility or onto the work site to investigate and gather information to determine whether any violations have
    occurred. Information and evidence may include copies of written programs, employee records, training
    records, photographs, video, and documentation from employee interviews. It may also include
    measurements of various sorts and results from workplace sampling and monitoring equipment such as air
    monitoring devices and noise dosimeters. During a health-related inspection, such as a situation where a
    concern has been raised about an air contaminant or noise exposure, an industrial hygienist will be involved
    and may perform full-shift sampling or dosimetry that may occur over a period of days. This is also probably a
    good time to note that some complex inspections such as a large-scale ergonomics or process safety
    management inspection in a large facility can sometimes require OSHA to be on site for weeks or even
    months in some cases.

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Closing conference

    After the walk-around portion of the inspection is complete, the CSHO will hold a closing conference with the
    employer. During the closing conference, the CSHO explains the apparent violations and discusses the
    possibility of citations being issued. Typically, a time frame is set up for abating any alleged violations at this
    time. The rights and responsibilities of the employer are also explained. Basically, if the employer receives
    citations, he or she has 15 federal working days to either pay the penalties and abate the violations, hold an
    informal conference with the area director or his/her designee to come to some kind of settlement, or legally
    contest the inspection (OSHA, 2018a).

    Post inspection

    Following the inspection, citations may be issued by the OSHA area director. Other than serious violations are
    violations that are not likely to result in serious harm. Serious violations are those that could likely result in
    serious physical harm. Repeat violations are those for which the employer has been cited before, and willful
    violations are for violations where a willful disregard for the health and safety of the company’s employees
    can be demonstrated. Failure to abate (FTA) violations include cases in which the employer indicated to
    OSHA that a violation had been abated when in fact it had not. Serious, willful, repeat, and FTA violations
    typically carry substantial penalties with the latter three having the potential to be quite large (Goetsch, 2018;
    OSHA, 2018b).

    As previously indicated, the employer has 15 federal working days to decide what to do. They must either pay
    and abate the violations, come to a settlement with the area director, or legally contest. A legally contested
    case can be settled before a hearing between OSHA’s legal counsel and the employer’s attorney may go to
    court.

    In conclusion, it is important to understand both the role of states in OSHA enforcement and also how
    inspections work. The readings for this unit will further delve into these topics, and it is information that every
    safety professional should know.

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    References

    Goetsch, D. L. (2018). Occupational safety and health for technologists, engineers, and managers (9th ed.).

    Pearson.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. United States Department

    of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018a). All about OSHA (OSHA Publication No. 3302-08R).

    U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018b). Employer rights and responsibilities following a

    federal OSHA inspection (OSHA Publication No. 3000-04R). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – Introduction
    – Inspections

    – Walk-around
    – Closing conference
    – Post inspection

    – References

    **## UnitIVStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    2. Discuss the primary responsibilities of environmental health and safety regulatory agencies.
    2.1 Describe responsibilities of safety and health regulatory agencies.

    5. Discuss the various roles states play in implementing laws and regulations.

    5.1 Discuss the roles states play in implementing Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) laws and regulations.

    5.2 Differentiate between state-run OSHA agencies and federal OSHA.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. United States Department

    of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018). All about OSHA (OSHA Publication No. 3302-08R).

    U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018). Employer rights and responsibilities following a

    federal OSHA inspection (OSHA Publication No. 3000-04R). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    Introduction

    Welcome to Unit IV! In this unit, we will be discussing the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) and how it operates. We will also be considering the role that states play in implementing federal
    OSHA mandates and regulations. Finally, this unit will present information on the OSHA enforcement
    inspection process and what an employer can expect from an OSHA inspection and actions that can be taken
    to minimize the impact of proposed penalties.

    As you should have been able to determine by now, OSHA is an agency that not only has the responsibility of
    promulgating safety and health standards through the rulemaking process, but it also enforcing those
    standards after they are in place. We already covered the rulemaking process in Unit I of this course. In this
    unit, we will focus more extensively on OSHA’s enforcement role.

    OSHA is prevalent in all 50 states in one fashion or another. In most states, OSHA has a federal enforcement
    presence, meaning that they have one or more area offices that cover workplaces in the state. These area
    offices are typically headed by an area director who oversees the area office that is typically made up of a
    number of compliance safety and health officers (CSHOs). Typically, the team or teams of CSHOs are
    comprised of safety specialists and industrial hygienists. Some larger offices may also employ a safety
    engineer, and many have one or more compliance assistance specialist.

    Recall from Unit I, however, that the OSH Act allowed states to run their own OSHA if a given state preferred
    to do so. OSHA provides funding for 50% of the cost of running these state-level programs. As of 2019, there
    are 22 states that currently have their own OSHA (OSHA, n.d.). These OSHA programs are required to be at

    UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
    OSHA Enforcement and
    Jurisdictional Issues

    [https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs](https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    least as effective as the federal OSHA rules, promulgate their own standards, and enforce those standards in
    a fashion similar to the federal OSHA. States are also required to have jurisdiction over both public and
    private employers. This is different from the federal OSHA, which has jurisdiction over only private industry
    according to the act, and federal agencies, according to an executive order. Thus, in a federal OSHA state, it
    is up to the state to decide how to protect employees of the state and employees of its political subdivisions,
    such as counties, cities, and school districts (OSHA, n.d.).

    The primary role of the area office (whether a state or federal OSHA office) is essentially to enforce OSHA
    standards by conducting inspections to determine if organizations working within the jurisdiction are following
    OSHA’s standards or otherwise providing a workplace that is free from recognized hazards. Inspections can
    be conducted for a number of reasons. When it comes to prioritizing inspections, OSHA has given reports of
    imminent danger the number one ranking. This is because of the likelihood that someone may be injured and
    needs to be removed from the hazard as soon as possible. Next in line on the priority list includes reports of
    severe injuries and illnesses including fatalities, amputations, loss of an eye, or hospitalizations (Goetsch,
    2018).

    Next on the priority list are formal employee complaints and referrals. Formal complaints need to be signed by
    a current employee of the organization or an appropriate representative. Referrals typically come from an
    individual who is working in some sort of official capacity who brings a workplace hazard to the attention of
    OSHA. An example might include a physician calling the OSHA office to indicate that employees who work for
    a car battery remanufacturing plant have very high blood lead levels. Referrals can be taken from news media
    reports as well. Another type of referral is a within office referral in which a compliance officer makes a referral
    to a separate discipline or identifies a hazard from a public access way (Goetsch, 2018).

    Programmed planned inspections are a bit different from those described previously in that OSHA typically
    develops a program for accessing facilities and worksites in which it can be reasonably assumed that a
    hazard exists. The rationale and the policies and procedures are typically described in compliance directives
    known as emphasis programs. The last type of inspection on the priority list that OSHA conducts is the follow-
    up or monitoring inspection. These inspections are conducted to make sure employers have abated a given
    hazard or that they are proceeding toward abatement based on their agreement with OSHA.

    Inspections

    When OSHA conducts inspections, they typically show up unannounced. The CSHO will show the employer’s
    representative his or her credentials and hold an opening conference explaining the scope and purpose of the
    inspection and on overview of what it entails. The scope of the inspection can vary from looking at a few
    complaint items and routine review of a few programs the employer is required to maintain, to a full-blown
    wall-to-wall comprehensive inspection. Typically, the latter type of inspection is tied to a programmed
    inspection resulting from one of OSHA’s emphasis programs. OSHA, of course, needs permission to conduct
    the inspection from the employer who can deny access. When this occurs, OSHA will need to obtain a
    warrant to gain access to the facility. Warrants can be obtained within a day if it is urgent for OSHA to gain
    access, but the process typically takes several days or more before OSHA returns to the facility (OSHA,
    2018a).

    Walk-around

    The next part of the inspection process is often referred to as the walk-around and involves going into the
    facility or onto the work site to investigate and gather information to determine whether any violations have
    occurred. Information and evidence may include copies of written programs, employee records, training
    records, photographs, video, and documentation from employee interviews. It may also include
    measurements of various sorts and results from workplace sampling and monitoring equipment such as air
    monitoring devices and noise dosimeters. During a health-related inspection, such as a situation where a
    concern has been raised about an air contaminant or noise exposure, an industrial hygienist will be involved
    and may perform full-shift sampling or dosimetry that may occur over a period of days. This is also probably a
    good time to note that some complex inspections such as a large-scale ergonomics or process safety
    management inspection in a large facility can sometimes require OSHA to be on site for weeks or even
    months in some cases.

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Closing conference

    After the walk-around portion of the inspection is complete, the CSHO will hold a closing conference with the
    employer. During the closing conference, the CSHO explains the apparent violations and discusses the
    possibility of citations being issued. Typically, a time frame is set up for abating any alleged violations at this
    time. The rights and responsibilities of the employer are also explained. Basically, if the employer receives
    citations, he or she has 15 federal working days to either pay the penalties and abate the violations, hold an
    informal conference with the area director or his/her designee to come to some kind of settlement, or legally
    contest the inspection (OSHA, 2018a).

    Post inspection

    Following the inspection, citations may be issued by the OSHA area director. Other than serious violations are
    violations that are not likely to result in serious harm. Serious violations are those that could likely result in
    serious physical harm. Repeat violations are those for which the employer has been cited before, and willful
    violations are for violations where a willful disregard for the health and safety of the company’s employees
    can be demonstrated. Failure to abate (FTA) violations include cases in which the employer indicated to
    OSHA that a violation had been abated when in fact it had not. Serious, willful, repeat, and FTA violations
    typically carry substantial penalties with the latter three having the potential to be quite large (Goetsch, 2018;
    OSHA, 2018b).

    As previously indicated, the employer has 15 federal working days to decide what to do. They must either pay
    and abate the violations, come to a settlement with the area director, or legally contest. A legally contested
    case can be settled before a hearing between OSHA’s legal counsel and the employer’s attorney may go to
    court.

    In conclusion, it is important to understand both the role of states in OSHA enforcement and also how
    inspections work. The readings for this unit will further delve into these topics, and it is information that every
    safety professional should know.

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    References

    Goetsch, D. L. (2018). Occupational safety and health for technologists, engineers, and managers (9th ed.).

    Pearson.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. United States Department

    of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018a). All about OSHA (OSHA Publication No. 3302-08R).

    U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018b). Employer rights and responsibilities following a

    federal OSHA inspection (OSHA Publication No. 3000-04R). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – Introduction
    – Inspections

    – Walk-around
    – Closing conference
    – Post inspection

    – References

    **## UnitIVJournal.docx**

    Unit IV Journal

    What is the OSHA situation in your state? Is there a state-run agency, or does the federal agency handle issues? Do you think it is the best approach, and how does it affect you?

    Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

    **## UnitIVStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    2. Discuss the primary responsibilities of environmental health and safety regulatory agencies.
    2.1 Describe responsibilities of safety and health regulatory agencies.

    5. Discuss the various roles states play in implementing laws and regulations.

    5.1 Discuss the roles states play in implementing Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) laws and regulations.

    5.2 Differentiate between state-run OSHA agencies and federal OSHA.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. United States Department

    of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018). All about OSHA (OSHA Publication No. 3302-08R).

    U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018). Employer rights and responsibilities following a

    federal OSHA inspection (OSHA Publication No. 3000-04R). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    Introduction

    Welcome to Unit IV! In this unit, we will be discussing the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) and how it operates. We will also be considering the role that states play in implementing federal
    OSHA mandates and regulations. Finally, this unit will present information on the OSHA enforcement
    inspection process and what an employer can expect from an OSHA inspection and actions that can be taken
    to minimize the impact of proposed penalties.

    As you should have been able to determine by now, OSHA is an agency that not only has the responsibility of
    promulgating safety and health standards through the rulemaking process, but it also enforcing those
    standards after they are in place. We already covered the rulemaking process in Unit I of this course. In this
    unit, we will focus more extensively on OSHA’s enforcement role.

    OSHA is prevalent in all 50 states in one fashion or another. In most states, OSHA has a federal enforcement
    presence, meaning that they have one or more area offices that cover workplaces in the state. These area
    offices are typically headed by an area director who oversees the area office that is typically made up of a
    number of compliance safety and health officers (CSHOs). Typically, the team or teams of CSHOs are
    comprised of safety specialists and industrial hygienists. Some larger offices may also employ a safety
    engineer, and many have one or more compliance assistance specialist.

    Recall from Unit I, however, that the OSH Act allowed states to run their own OSHA if a given state preferred
    to do so. OSHA provides funding for 50% of the cost of running these state-level programs. As of 2019, there
    are 22 states that currently have their own OSHA (OSHA, n.d.). These OSHA programs are required to be at

    UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
    OSHA Enforcement and
    Jurisdictional Issues

    [https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs](https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    least as effective as the federal OSHA rules, promulgate their own standards, and enforce those standards in
    a fashion similar to the federal OSHA. States are also required to have jurisdiction over both public and
    private employers. This is different from the federal OSHA, which has jurisdiction over only private industry
    according to the act, and federal agencies, according to an executive order. Thus, in a federal OSHA state, it
    is up to the state to decide how to protect employees of the state and employees of its political subdivisions,
    such as counties, cities, and school districts (OSHA, n.d.).

    The primary role of the area office (whether a state or federal OSHA office) is essentially to enforce OSHA
    standards by conducting inspections to determine if organizations working within the jurisdiction are following
    OSHA’s standards or otherwise providing a workplace that is free from recognized hazards. Inspections can
    be conducted for a number of reasons. When it comes to prioritizing inspections, OSHA has given reports of
    imminent danger the number one ranking. This is because of the likelihood that someone may be injured and
    needs to be removed from the hazard as soon as possible. Next in line on the priority list includes reports of
    severe injuries and illnesses including fatalities, amputations, loss of an eye, or hospitalizations (Goetsch,
    2018).

    Next on the priority list are formal employee complaints and referrals. Formal complaints need to be signed by
    a current employee of the organization or an appropriate representative. Referrals typically come from an
    individual who is working in some sort of official capacity who brings a workplace hazard to the attention of
    OSHA. An example might include a physician calling the OSHA office to indicate that employees who work for
    a car battery remanufacturing plant have very high blood lead levels. Referrals can be taken from news media
    reports as well. Another type of referral is a within office referral in which a compliance officer makes a referral
    to a separate discipline or identifies a hazard from a public access way (Goetsch, 2018).

    Programmed planned inspections are a bit different from those described previously in that OSHA typically
    develops a program for accessing facilities and worksites in which it can be reasonably assumed that a
    hazard exists. The rationale and the policies and procedures are typically described in compliance directives
    known as emphasis programs. The last type of inspection on the priority list that OSHA conducts is the follow-
    up or monitoring inspection. These inspections are conducted to make sure employers have abated a given
    hazard or that they are proceeding toward abatement based on their agreement with OSHA.

    Inspections

    When OSHA conducts inspections, they typically show up unannounced. The CSHO will show the employer’s
    representative his or her credentials and hold an opening conference explaining the scope and purpose of the
    inspection and on overview of what it entails. The scope of the inspection can vary from looking at a few
    complaint items and routine review of a few programs the employer is required to maintain, to a full-blown
    wall-to-wall comprehensive inspection. Typically, the latter type of inspection is tied to a programmed
    inspection resulting from one of OSHA’s emphasis programs. OSHA, of course, needs permission to conduct
    the inspection from the employer who can deny access. When this occurs, OSHA will need to obtain a
    warrant to gain access to the facility. Warrants can be obtained within a day if it is urgent for OSHA to gain
    access, but the process typically takes several days or more before OSHA returns to the facility (OSHA,
    2018a).

    Walk-around

    The next part of the inspection process is often referred to as the walk-around and involves going into the
    facility or onto the work site to investigate and gather information to determine whether any violations have
    occurred. Information and evidence may include copies of written programs, employee records, training
    records, photographs, video, and documentation from employee interviews. It may also include
    measurements of various sorts and results from workplace sampling and monitoring equipment such as air
    monitoring devices and noise dosimeters. During a health-related inspection, such as a situation where a
    concern has been raised about an air contaminant or noise exposure, an industrial hygienist will be involved
    and may perform full-shift sampling or dosimetry that may occur over a period of days. This is also probably a
    good time to note that some complex inspections such as a large-scale ergonomics or process safety
    management inspection in a large facility can sometimes require OSHA to be on site for weeks or even
    months in some cases.

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Closing conference

    After the walk-around portion of the inspection is complete, the CSHO will hold a closing conference with the
    employer. During the closing conference, the CSHO explains the apparent violations and discusses the
    possibility of citations being issued. Typically, a time frame is set up for abating any alleged violations at this
    time. The rights and responsibilities of the employer are also explained. Basically, if the employer receives
    citations, he or she has 15 federal working days to either pay the penalties and abate the violations, hold an
    informal conference with the area director or his/her designee to come to some kind of settlement, or legally
    contest the inspection (OSHA, 2018a).

    Post inspection

    Following the inspection, citations may be issued by the OSHA area director. Other than serious violations are
    violations that are not likely to result in serious harm. Serious violations are those that could likely result in
    serious physical harm. Repeat violations are those for which the employer has been cited before, and willful
    violations are for violations where a willful disregard for the health and safety of the company’s employees
    can be demonstrated. Failure to abate (FTA) violations include cases in which the employer indicated to
    OSHA that a violation had been abated when in fact it had not. Serious, willful, repeat, and FTA violations
    typically carry substantial penalties with the latter three having the potential to be quite large (Goetsch, 2018;
    OSHA, 2018b).

    As previously indicated, the employer has 15 federal working days to decide what to do. They must either pay
    and abate the violations, come to a settlement with the area director, or legally contest. A legally contested
    case can be settled before a hearing between OSHA’s legal counsel and the employer’s attorney may go to
    court.

    In conclusion, it is important to understand both the role of states in OSHA enforcement and also how
    inspections work. The readings for this unit will further delve into these topics, and it is information that every
    safety professional should know.

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    References

    Goetsch, D. L. (2018). Occupational safety and health for technologists, engineers, and managers (9th ed.).

    Pearson.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. United States Department

    of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018a). All about OSHA (OSHA Publication No. 3302-08R).

    U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018b). Employer rights and responsibilities following a

    federal OSHA inspection (OSHA Publication No. 3000-04R). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – Introduction
    – Inspections

    – Walk-around
    – Closing conference
    – Post inspection

    – References

    **## UnitIVJournal.docx**

    Unit IV Journal

    What is the OSHA situation in your state? Is there a state-run agency, or does the federal agency handle issues? Do you think it is the best approach, and how does it affect you?

    Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

    **## UnitIVStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    2. Discuss the primary responsibilities of environmental health and safety regulatory agencies.
    2.1 Describe responsibilities of safety and health regulatory agencies.

    5. Discuss the various roles states play in implementing laws and regulations.

    5.1 Discuss the roles states play in implementing Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) laws and regulations.

    5.2 Differentiate between state-run OSHA agencies and federal OSHA.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. United States Department

    of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018). All about OSHA (OSHA Publication No. 3302-08R).

    U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018). Employer rights and responsibilities following a

    federal OSHA inspection (OSHA Publication No. 3000-04R). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf

    Unit Lesson

    Introduction

    Welcome to Unit IV! In this unit, we will be discussing the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    (OSHA) and how it operates. We will also be considering the role that states play in implementing federal
    OSHA mandates and regulations. Finally, this unit will present information on the OSHA enforcement
    inspection process and what an employer can expect from an OSHA inspection and actions that can be taken
    to minimize the impact of proposed penalties.

    As you should have been able to determine by now, OSHA is an agency that not only has the responsibility of
    promulgating safety and health standards through the rulemaking process, but it also enforcing those
    standards after they are in place. We already covered the rulemaking process in Unit I of this course. In this
    unit, we will focus more extensively on OSHA’s enforcement role.

    OSHA is prevalent in all 50 states in one fashion or another. In most states, OSHA has a federal enforcement
    presence, meaning that they have one or more area offices that cover workplaces in the state. These area
    offices are typically headed by an area director who oversees the area office that is typically made up of a
    number of compliance safety and health officers (CSHOs). Typically, the team or teams of CSHOs are
    comprised of safety specialists and industrial hygienists. Some larger offices may also employ a safety
    engineer, and many have one or more compliance assistance specialist.

    Recall from Unit I, however, that the OSH Act allowed states to run their own OSHA if a given state preferred
    to do so. OSHA provides funding for 50% of the cost of running these state-level programs. As of 2019, there
    are 22 states that currently have their own OSHA (OSHA, n.d.). These OSHA programs are required to be at

    UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
    OSHA Enforcement and
    Jurisdictional Issues

    [https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs](https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf)

    [https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf](https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    least as effective as the federal OSHA rules, promulgate their own standards, and enforce those standards in
    a fashion similar to the federal OSHA. States are also required to have jurisdiction over both public and
    private employers. This is different from the federal OSHA, which has jurisdiction over only private industry
    according to the act, and federal agencies, according to an executive order. Thus, in a federal OSHA state, it
    is up to the state to decide how to protect employees of the state and employees of its political subdivisions,
    such as counties, cities, and school districts (OSHA, n.d.).

    The primary role of the area office (whether a state or federal OSHA office) is essentially to enforce OSHA
    standards by conducting inspections to determine if organizations working within the jurisdiction are following
    OSHA’s standards or otherwise providing a workplace that is free from recognized hazards. Inspections can
    be conducted for a number of reasons. When it comes to prioritizing inspections, OSHA has given reports of
    imminent danger the number one ranking. This is because of the likelihood that someone may be injured and
    needs to be removed from the hazard as soon as possible. Next in line on the priority list includes reports of
    severe injuries and illnesses including fatalities, amputations, loss of an eye, or hospitalizations (Goetsch,
    2018).

    Next on the priority list are formal employee complaints and referrals. Formal complaints need to be signed by
    a current employee of the organization or an appropriate representative. Referrals typically come from an
    individual who is working in some sort of official capacity who brings a workplace hazard to the attention of
    OSHA. An example might include a physician calling the OSHA office to indicate that employees who work for
    a car battery remanufacturing plant have very high blood lead levels. Referrals can be taken from news media
    reports as well. Another type of referral is a within office referral in which a compliance officer makes a referral
    to a separate discipline or identifies a hazard from a public access way (Goetsch, 2018).

    Programmed planned inspections are a bit different from those described previously in that OSHA typically
    develops a program for accessing facilities and worksites in which it can be reasonably assumed that a
    hazard exists. The rationale and the policies and procedures are typically described in compliance directives
    known as emphasis programs. The last type of inspection on the priority list that OSHA conducts is the follow-
    up or monitoring inspection. These inspections are conducted to make sure employers have abated a given
    hazard or that they are proceeding toward abatement based on their agreement with OSHA.

    Inspections

    When OSHA conducts inspections, they typically show up unannounced. The CSHO will show the employer’s
    representative his or her credentials and hold an opening conference explaining the scope and purpose of the
    inspection and on overview of what it entails. The scope of the inspection can vary from looking at a few
    complaint items and routine review of a few programs the employer is required to maintain, to a full-blown
    wall-to-wall comprehensive inspection. Typically, the latter type of inspection is tied to a programmed
    inspection resulting from one of OSHA’s emphasis programs. OSHA, of course, needs permission to conduct
    the inspection from the employer who can deny access. When this occurs, OSHA will need to obtain a
    warrant to gain access to the facility. Warrants can be obtained within a day if it is urgent for OSHA to gain
    access, but the process typically takes several days or more before OSHA returns to the facility (OSHA,
    2018a).

    Walk-around

    The next part of the inspection process is often referred to as the walk-around and involves going into the
    facility or onto the work site to investigate and gather information to determine whether any violations have
    occurred. Information and evidence may include copies of written programs, employee records, training
    records, photographs, video, and documentation from employee interviews. It may also include
    measurements of various sorts and results from workplace sampling and monitoring equipment such as air
    monitoring devices and noise dosimeters. During a health-related inspection, such as a situation where a
    concern has been raised about an air contaminant or noise exposure, an industrial hygienist will be involved
    and may perform full-shift sampling or dosimetry that may occur over a period of days. This is also probably a
    good time to note that some complex inspections such as a large-scale ergonomics or process safety
    management inspection in a large facility can sometimes require OSHA to be on site for weeks or even
    months in some cases.

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Closing conference

    After the walk-around portion of the inspection is complete, the CSHO will hold a closing conference with the
    employer. During the closing conference, the CSHO explains the apparent violations and discusses the
    possibility of citations being issued. Typically, a time frame is set up for abating any alleged violations at this
    time. The rights and responsibilities of the employer are also explained. Basically, if the employer receives
    citations, he or she has 15 federal working days to either pay the penalties and abate the violations, hold an
    informal conference with the area director or his/her designee to come to some kind of settlement, or legally
    contest the inspection (OSHA, 2018a).

    Post inspection

    Following the inspection, citations may be issued by the OSHA area director. Other than serious violations are
    violations that are not likely to result in serious harm. Serious violations are those that could likely result in
    serious physical harm. Repeat violations are those for which the employer has been cited before, and willful
    violations are for violations where a willful disregard for the health and safety of the company’s employees
    can be demonstrated. Failure to abate (FTA) violations include cases in which the employer indicated to
    OSHA that a violation had been abated when in fact it had not. Serious, willful, repeat, and FTA violations
    typically carry substantial penalties with the latter three having the potential to be quite large (Goetsch, 2018;
    OSHA, 2018b).

    As previously indicated, the employer has 15 federal working days to decide what to do. They must either pay
    and abate the violations, come to a settlement with the area director, or legally contest. A legally contested
    case can be settled before a hearing between OSHA’s legal counsel and the employer’s attorney may go to
    court.

    In conclusion, it is important to understand both the role of states in OSHA enforcement and also how
    inspections work. The readings for this unit will further delve into these topics, and it is information that every
    safety professional should know.

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    References

    Goetsch, D. L. (2018). Occupational safety and health for technologists, engineers, and managers (9th ed.).

    Pearson.

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. United States Department

    of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/faqs

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018a). All about OSHA (OSHA Publication No. 3302-08R).

    U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/all_about_OSHA.pdf

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018b). Employer rights and responsibilities following a

    federal OSHA inspection (OSHA Publication No. 3000-04R). U.S. Department of Labor.
    https://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3000.pdf

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – Introduction
    – Inspections

    – Walk-around
    – Closing conference
    – Post inspection

    – References

  • [Solved] OSHA 2 WK 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached **files (2)** – ## UnitIIIProject.docx – ## UnitIIIStudyGuide.pdf **## UnitIIIProject.docx** Unit III Project Using materials covered in Unit I, II, and III, visit the interactive website [epa.gov/research/epa-research-your-state](https://www.epa.gov/research/epa-research-your-state), a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## UnitIIIProject.docx

    – ## UnitIIIStudyGuide.pdf

    **## UnitIIIProject.docx**

    Unit III Project

    Using materials covered in Unit I, II, and III, visit the interactive website
    [epa.gov/research/epa-research-your-state](https://www.epa.gov/research/epa-research-your-state), and review the state laws for air and water from your state or a state of interest to you. You can find this information under the Environmental Info section of each state’s individual page. After exploring the website and doing any other necessary research, compose an essay that addresses the following topics:

    1. Introduce the state you have chosen, and summarize the issues associated with air and water quality and the regulations and programs being adopted by the chosen state to solve those issues.

    2. Briefly explain the federal legislative process that creates laws and regulations.

    3. Analyze whether the programs to address air and water issues will succeed and if they are worth the work hours and costs being spent.

    4. Recommend what you would give to the EPA to address the environmental issues in the state.

    5. Discuss how individuals, industries, and corporations can engage with governmental agencies.

    Your completed project must be at least three pages in length, not counting the title and reference page, and you must use at least one academic source in addition to the EPA website. APA formatting is required. All sources used, including the course textbook, must be referenced. Paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying in-text citations.

    **## UnitIIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    3. Describe the regulation promulgation process.
    3.1 Discuss state regulations and programs being implemented to solve environmental issues.

    5. Discuss the various roles states play in implementing laws and regulations.

    5.1 Summarize environmental issues in a specific state.
    5.2 Analyze the effectiveness of specific state environmental programs.
    5.3 Recommend solutions to environmental issues in a specific state.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). EPA in your state. https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state

    Unit Lesson

    State Environmental Regulatory Agencies

    In this unit, we will discuss jurisdictional issues and relationships with environmental regulatory agencies.
    Rulemaking of environmental laws at the state level follows a similar process to that of federal law. When it
    comes to aligning federal and state environmental laws, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives
    states the option to implement and administer federal environmental law with oversight from the EPA. An
    obvious question is to ask why a state would be willing to take on the expense and staffing requirements for
    administering a federal law. The answer has to do with the severe consequences related to enforcement.

    There is a strategic advantage for states in the way that noncompliance is addressed. States that administer
    the federal programs can work with their industrial manufacturing base and take steps to remediate issues
    while protecting jobs and the tax base for local communities. They also have the option to decide how
    assessed fines are used—whether they go into state coffers or back to the company to be used to fix the
    problems and issues that led up to the noncompliance. When the federal government manages enforcement,
    the funds often go into federal coffers, resulting in some industries closing down and relocating out of the area
    or country. A second benefit is how audits are done at the facility. The federal government only looks at
    federal requirements. They follow the letter of the law, they have their own interpretation on how regulatory
    provisions are interpreted, and they are more willing to let the consequences fall where they will. When states
    own the audit process, they can control how compliance is defined when the requirements are ambiguous for
    the situation, and they also have the opportunity to view state specific requirements in addition to those of
    federal legislation.

    States have the right to customize and add provisions to the federal legislation. What states cannot do is to
    take away from the federal requirements. The provisions they add can be functional equivalents of federal
    regulations that fit better into regional practices and the way that business is conducted in the state. This
    serves as a reminder to consultants looking to come into a state to perform an environmental audit (e.g., ISO
    audits and responsible care audits). It is important to check both the statutes and regulatory requirements of
    federal and state agencies when preparing audit protocols for industrial sites. Some states have taken steps
    to add provisions that establish a separate list of chemicals of concern requiring special attention. For
    example, California has developed regulations around Proposition 65 requiring companies to notify customers

    UNIT III STUDY GUIDE
    The Process of Developing State
    Environmental Laws and Regulations

    [https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state](https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    using container labels that the product contains a carcinogen or a reproductive toxicant (California Office of
    Environmental Health Hazard Assessment [OEHHA], 2014).

    A notification can be made about any level, and no level is too small. Even if the substance to be notified is in
    the product as an impurity at 0.001%, a Proposition 65 warning label is required. The state of California
    chooses not to make an interpretation for citizens on what level is significant leaving it to the consumer to
    decide if this level is relevant. For a limited number of chemicals where test data is available, California is
    willing to use this information to establish a level of significance, but they will not do so using read-across or
    structure-analysis models (OEHHA, 2014). The Proposition 65 requirement allows citizens to bring litigation
    against companies who place products on the market without a Proposition 65 warning label. There are many
    lawyers who have made a healthy living filing lawsuits against noncompliant companies. It is not uncommon
    for a company to sell a product to a customer in Michigan only to have them repurpose the product and send
    it to their customer in California. If the container sold in Michigan does not have a Proposition 65 warning, the
    manufacturer of the product may get sued in California. The defendant will often end up settling out of court,
    as it is often cheaper to do a buyout than to litigate the noncompliance in court.

    States like New Jersey have extra provisions enforcing regulations that they believe are important to their
    population involving “right-to-know” provisions for products sold in their jurisdiction (State of New Jersey,
    Department of Health, n.d.). Companies selling hazardous products in New Jersey have to meet specific
    labeling and notification requirements beyond that required by federal regulations. Multiply this by 50 states,
    and it is not hard to see the challenges that manufacturers face selling products in the 50 states where each
    state has a slightly different set of rules. The EPA watches state initiatives to identify regional concerns and
    trends. While each requirement has its own merits and justification, the EPA is the great unifier. When
    multiple states have aligned on an issue and they begin to implement special regulations ahead of EPA, the
    agency will seek to align these interests and incorporate them in a future regulation. Once the EPA publishes
    their unification rule, states are required to sunset their requirements and align with the federal rule.

    However, until the time comes when the EPA writes a rule for a specific issue, states are free to move forward
    on their own issuing regulations and requirements to satisfy their citizens and special interest groups. This
    process shows one way that states and the EPA communicate on issues and priorities that the EPA is
    requested to take to Congress to consider the merits of the rule for the nation.

    Each state has its own regulatory processes for passing legislation into law and then into regulations to be
    administered by designated agencies responsible for protecting the environment. One of the most active is
    the State of Washington’s Department of Ecology. In Washington, environmental statutory authority is given
    by the legislature when it gives permission to a state agency to write and adopt a rule on an environmental
    subject (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    As with most states, the state of Washington has its own list of definitions for key terms. These do not always
    align among the 50 states. Certain phrases and vocabulary common to Washington may not be the same as
    used in other states. This makes it challenging to compare requirements and to extrapolate regulatory
    interpretations about the rules in Washington to other states like California and New York.

    Washington state has a three-step process for turning a law into a functional regulation. The first phase is to
    make an announcement to the public that the agency is intending to amend, repeal, or adopt a new
    regulation. A brief description of the legislative intent is given as is the contact information of the lead agency
    (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    The second phase proceeds to publish the proposal at least 30 days after the announcement is formally
    made. The proposal is a draft of the rule giving a brief overview of the rule, a copy of the proposed text,
    identification of the lead agency, the proposed enter-into-force date, and information about planned public
    hearings. During this time, all rules start to receive an economic analysis looking at the cost-benefit analysis
    and an analysis of the least-burdensome alternative. These are published on the state website. The impact on
    small businesses is also a part of the analysis as is determining the maximum net benefit to the environment
    (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    Formal public comments are considered by the lead agency. Except for public hearings, written responses
    are necessary for a concern to be considered. For rules where substantial issues are raised, regulators can
    set up committees to work through the issues to reach a resolution. Lead agencies prepare a formal written

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    response to key comments explaining the issue, how they were considered and the final determination made
    by the regulators. Should the regulation ever be litigated in state courts, these comments are valuable source
    documents for lawyers and the courts.

    The final step in the legislative process is to officially adopt the rule after the agency director signs the
    document. The rule will enter into force 31 days after the rule is signed. However, in special cases,
    emergency rules immediately become effective, and rules that are expedited have a 45-day comment period
    after which the rule comes into effect 31 days later (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    Some states have set up alliances to address regional concerns. One of these groups is the Great Lakes
    Commission (GLC), which includes Canadian provinces and the states surrounding the Great Lakes. The
    GLC has established a set of priorities intended to restore the water quality of the lakes and to prevent further
    deterioration of water quality. One of the biggest issues is the runoff of fertilizers from surrounding farmland.
    The runoff contains phosphorus that promotes algal blooms that cover the surface of the lake (Great Lakes
    Commission, 2019). While alive, some species of algae will produce toxic substances. After they die, the
    bacteria in the lakes begin to feast on the algae, consuming the dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water to support
    their feeding frenzy. When the DO levels go from 7.0 ppm to a value <0.5 ppm, the fish die and the water
    quality of the lakes is further degraded. That is not the end. During the time that the algae is being degraded,
    a portion of the phosphorus is released into the water where it will remain to support algal growth in the next
    season.

    This issue is starting to have an impact on industrial products where states limit the use of products
    containing phosphorus. Permit writers are setting very low phosphorus discharge limits for manufacturing
    facilities. Companies are now reviewing their raw materials to ensure that they purchase products free of
    phosphorus. The problem is that phosphorus has a defined function and products that use an alternative in
    their product formulation do not function as well. This raises manufacturing costs and occasionally will result
    in manufactured goods being produced that are of lower quality and less in demand than the products made
    by their competitors.

    Great Lakes states are participating in a restoration bipartisan initiative that addresses a variety of issues.
    Algae, invasive Asian carp, and the leaching of toxics from contaminated waste sites near rivers and the
    shores of the Great Lakes allowing harmful chemicals to flow into the lakes are a few of these issues. The
    GLC states are working in conjunction with federal agencies including the EPA, National Oceanic and
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Army Corp of Engineers on
    special projects. The commission is seeking to implement a farm bill to support agricultural conservation
    programs. Other programs being set up include establishing a fishery preserve and projects to protect
    drinking water (Great Lakes Commission, n.d.).

    In summary, the federal-state partnerships are strong and aligned. As budgets get tighter and the EPA
    remains bound on their role and influence, the success of compliance and pollution prevention programs will
    require more and more states to step up to take on the administration of federal programs.

    References

    California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. (2014). Proposition 65.

    https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65

    Great Lakes Commission. (n.d.). Our work: Advocacy. https://www.glc.org/work/advocacy/

    Great Lakes Commission. (2019, March). Investing in a national asset. https://www.glc.org/wp-

    content/uploads/GLC-Federal-Priorities-2019-FINAL.pdf

    State of New Jersey, Department of Health. (n.d.). Right to know.

    https://www.nj.gov/health/workplacehealthandsafety/right-to-know/

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Washington State Department of Ecology. (n.d.). Rulemaking frequently asked questions.
    https://ecology.wa.gov/About-us/How-we-operate/Laws-rules-rulemaking/Rulemaking-FAQ

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The following website looks at how citizens in each state feel about environmental regulations. Take some
    time to analyze differences and similarities seen from state to state.

    Pew Research Center. (2016). Public support for environmental regulations varies by state.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-
    varies-by-state/

    [https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-varies-by-state/](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-varies-by-state/)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – State Environmental Regulatory Agencies
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources

    **## UnitIIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    3. Describe the regulation promulgation process.
    3.1 Discuss state regulations and programs being implemented to solve environmental issues.

    5. Discuss the various roles states play in implementing laws and regulations.

    5.1 Summarize environmental issues in a specific state.
    5.2 Analyze the effectiveness of specific state environmental programs.
    5.3 Recommend solutions to environmental issues in a specific state.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). EPA in your state. https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state

    Unit Lesson

    State Environmental Regulatory Agencies

    In this unit, we will discuss jurisdictional issues and relationships with environmental regulatory agencies.
    Rulemaking of environmental laws at the state level follows a similar process to that of federal law. When it
    comes to aligning federal and state environmental laws, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives
    states the option to implement and administer federal environmental law with oversight from the EPA. An
    obvious question is to ask why a state would be willing to take on the expense and staffing requirements for
    administering a federal law. The answer has to do with the severe consequences related to enforcement.

    There is a strategic advantage for states in the way that noncompliance is addressed. States that administer
    the federal programs can work with their industrial manufacturing base and take steps to remediate issues
    while protecting jobs and the tax base for local communities. They also have the option to decide how
    assessed fines are used—whether they go into state coffers or back to the company to be used to fix the
    problems and issues that led up to the noncompliance. When the federal government manages enforcement,
    the funds often go into federal coffers, resulting in some industries closing down and relocating out of the area
    or country. A second benefit is how audits are done at the facility. The federal government only looks at
    federal requirements. They follow the letter of the law, they have their own interpretation on how regulatory
    provisions are interpreted, and they are more willing to let the consequences fall where they will. When states
    own the audit process, they can control how compliance is defined when the requirements are ambiguous for
    the situation, and they also have the opportunity to view state specific requirements in addition to those of
    federal legislation.

    States have the right to customize and add provisions to the federal legislation. What states cannot do is to
    take away from the federal requirements. The provisions they add can be functional equivalents of federal
    regulations that fit better into regional practices and the way that business is conducted in the state. This
    serves as a reminder to consultants looking to come into a state to perform an environmental audit (e.g., ISO
    audits and responsible care audits). It is important to check both the statutes and regulatory requirements of
    federal and state agencies when preparing audit protocols for industrial sites. Some states have taken steps
    to add provisions that establish a separate list of chemicals of concern requiring special attention. For
    example, California has developed regulations around Proposition 65 requiring companies to notify customers

    UNIT III STUDY GUIDE
    The Process of Developing State
    Environmental Laws and Regulations

    [https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state](https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    using container labels that the product contains a carcinogen or a reproductive toxicant (California Office of
    Environmental Health Hazard Assessment [OEHHA], 2014).

    A notification can be made about any level, and no level is too small. Even if the substance to be notified is in
    the product as an impurity at 0.001%, a Proposition 65 warning label is required. The state of California
    chooses not to make an interpretation for citizens on what level is significant leaving it to the consumer to
    decide if this level is relevant. For a limited number of chemicals where test data is available, California is
    willing to use this information to establish a level of significance, but they will not do so using read-across or
    structure-analysis models (OEHHA, 2014). The Proposition 65 requirement allows citizens to bring litigation
    against companies who place products on the market without a Proposition 65 warning label. There are many
    lawyers who have made a healthy living filing lawsuits against noncompliant companies. It is not uncommon
    for a company to sell a product to a customer in Michigan only to have them repurpose the product and send
    it to their customer in California. If the container sold in Michigan does not have a Proposition 65 warning, the
    manufacturer of the product may get sued in California. The defendant will often end up settling out of court,
    as it is often cheaper to do a buyout than to litigate the noncompliance in court.

    States like New Jersey have extra provisions enforcing regulations that they believe are important to their
    population involving “right-to-know” provisions for products sold in their jurisdiction (State of New Jersey,
    Department of Health, n.d.). Companies selling hazardous products in New Jersey have to meet specific
    labeling and notification requirements beyond that required by federal regulations. Multiply this by 50 states,
    and it is not hard to see the challenges that manufacturers face selling products in the 50 states where each
    state has a slightly different set of rules. The EPA watches state initiatives to identify regional concerns and
    trends. While each requirement has its own merits and justification, the EPA is the great unifier. When
    multiple states have aligned on an issue and they begin to implement special regulations ahead of EPA, the
    agency will seek to align these interests and incorporate them in a future regulation. Once the EPA publishes
    their unification rule, states are required to sunset their requirements and align with the federal rule.

    However, until the time comes when the EPA writes a rule for a specific issue, states are free to move forward
    on their own issuing regulations and requirements to satisfy their citizens and special interest groups. This
    process shows one way that states and the EPA communicate on issues and priorities that the EPA is
    requested to take to Congress to consider the merits of the rule for the nation.

    Each state has its own regulatory processes for passing legislation into law and then into regulations to be
    administered by designated agencies responsible for protecting the environment. One of the most active is
    the State of Washington’s Department of Ecology. In Washington, environmental statutory authority is given
    by the legislature when it gives permission to a state agency to write and adopt a rule on an environmental
    subject (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    As with most states, the state of Washington has its own list of definitions for key terms. These do not always
    align among the 50 states. Certain phrases and vocabulary common to Washington may not be the same as
    used in other states. This makes it challenging to compare requirements and to extrapolate regulatory
    interpretations about the rules in Washington to other states like California and New York.

    Washington state has a three-step process for turning a law into a functional regulation. The first phase is to
    make an announcement to the public that the agency is intending to amend, repeal, or adopt a new
    regulation. A brief description of the legislative intent is given as is the contact information of the lead agency
    (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    The second phase proceeds to publish the proposal at least 30 days after the announcement is formally
    made. The proposal is a draft of the rule giving a brief overview of the rule, a copy of the proposed text,
    identification of the lead agency, the proposed enter-into-force date, and information about planned public
    hearings. During this time, all rules start to receive an economic analysis looking at the cost-benefit analysis
    and an analysis of the least-burdensome alternative. These are published on the state website. The impact on
    small businesses is also a part of the analysis as is determining the maximum net benefit to the environment
    (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    Formal public comments are considered by the lead agency. Except for public hearings, written responses
    are necessary for a concern to be considered. For rules where substantial issues are raised, regulators can
    set up committees to work through the issues to reach a resolution. Lead agencies prepare a formal written

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    response to key comments explaining the issue, how they were considered and the final determination made
    by the regulators. Should the regulation ever be litigated in state courts, these comments are valuable source
    documents for lawyers and the courts.

    The final step in the legislative process is to officially adopt the rule after the agency director signs the
    document. The rule will enter into force 31 days after the rule is signed. However, in special cases,
    emergency rules immediately become effective, and rules that are expedited have a 45-day comment period
    after which the rule comes into effect 31 days later (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    Some states have set up alliances to address regional concerns. One of these groups is the Great Lakes
    Commission (GLC), which includes Canadian provinces and the states surrounding the Great Lakes. The
    GLC has established a set of priorities intended to restore the water quality of the lakes and to prevent further
    deterioration of water quality. One of the biggest issues is the runoff of fertilizers from surrounding farmland.
    The runoff contains phosphorus that promotes algal blooms that cover the surface of the lake (Great Lakes
    Commission, 2019). While alive, some species of algae will produce toxic substances. After they die, the
    bacteria in the lakes begin to feast on the algae, consuming the dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water to support
    their feeding frenzy. When the DO levels go from 7.0 ppm to a value <0.5 ppm, the fish die and the water
    quality of the lakes is further degraded. That is not the end. During the time that the algae is being degraded,
    a portion of the phosphorus is released into the water where it will remain to support algal growth in the next
    season.

    This issue is starting to have an impact on industrial products where states limit the use of products
    containing phosphorus. Permit writers are setting very low phosphorus discharge limits for manufacturing
    facilities. Companies are now reviewing their raw materials to ensure that they purchase products free of
    phosphorus. The problem is that phosphorus has a defined function and products that use an alternative in
    their product formulation do not function as well. This raises manufacturing costs and occasionally will result
    in manufactured goods being produced that are of lower quality and less in demand than the products made
    by their competitors.

    Great Lakes states are participating in a restoration bipartisan initiative that addresses a variety of issues.
    Algae, invasive Asian carp, and the leaching of toxics from contaminated waste sites near rivers and the
    shores of the Great Lakes allowing harmful chemicals to flow into the lakes are a few of these issues. The
    GLC states are working in conjunction with federal agencies including the EPA, National Oceanic and
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Army Corp of Engineers on
    special projects. The commission is seeking to implement a farm bill to support agricultural conservation
    programs. Other programs being set up include establishing a fishery preserve and projects to protect
    drinking water (Great Lakes Commission, n.d.).

    In summary, the federal-state partnerships are strong and aligned. As budgets get tighter and the EPA
    remains bound on their role and influence, the success of compliance and pollution prevention programs will
    require more and more states to step up to take on the administration of federal programs.

    References

    California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. (2014). Proposition 65.

    https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65

    Great Lakes Commission. (n.d.). Our work: Advocacy. https://www.glc.org/work/advocacy/

    Great Lakes Commission. (2019, March). Investing in a national asset. https://www.glc.org/wp-

    content/uploads/GLC-Federal-Priorities-2019-FINAL.pdf

    State of New Jersey, Department of Health. (n.d.). Right to know.

    https://www.nj.gov/health/workplacehealthandsafety/right-to-know/

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Washington State Department of Ecology. (n.d.). Rulemaking frequently asked questions.
    https://ecology.wa.gov/About-us/How-we-operate/Laws-rules-rulemaking/Rulemaking-FAQ

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The following website looks at how citizens in each state feel about environmental regulations. Take some
    time to analyze differences and similarities seen from state to state.

    Pew Research Center. (2016). Public support for environmental regulations varies by state.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-
    varies-by-state/

    [https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-varies-by-state/](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-varies-by-state/)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – State Environmental Regulatory Agencies
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources

    **## UnitIIIProject.docx**

    Unit III Project

    Using materials covered in Unit I, II, and III, visit the interactive website
    [epa.gov/research/epa-research-your-state](https://www.epa.gov/research/epa-research-your-state), and review the state laws for air and water from your state or a state of interest to you. You can find this information under the Environmental Info section of each state’s individual page. After exploring the website and doing any other necessary research, compose an essay that addresses the following topics:

    1. Introduce the state you have chosen, and summarize the issues associated with air and water quality and the regulations and programs being adopted by the chosen state to solve those issues.

    2. Briefly explain the federal legislative process that creates laws and regulations.

    3. Analyze whether the programs to address air and water issues will succeed and if they are worth the work hours and costs being spent.

    4. Recommend what you would give to the EPA to address the environmental issues in the state.

    5. Discuss how individuals, industries, and corporations can engage with governmental agencies.

    Your completed project must be at least three pages in length, not counting the title and reference page, and you must use at least one academic source in addition to the EPA website. APA formatting is required. All sources used, including the course textbook, must be referenced. Paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying in-text citations.

    **## UnitIIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    3. Describe the regulation promulgation process.
    3.1 Discuss state regulations and programs being implemented to solve environmental issues.

    5. Discuss the various roles states play in implementing laws and regulations.

    5.1 Summarize environmental issues in a specific state.
    5.2 Analyze the effectiveness of specific state environmental programs.
    5.3 Recommend solutions to environmental issues in a specific state.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). EPA in your state. https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state

    Unit Lesson

    State Environmental Regulatory Agencies

    In this unit, we will discuss jurisdictional issues and relationships with environmental regulatory agencies.
    Rulemaking of environmental laws at the state level follows a similar process to that of federal law. When it
    comes to aligning federal and state environmental laws, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives
    states the option to implement and administer federal environmental law with oversight from the EPA. An
    obvious question is to ask why a state would be willing to take on the expense and staffing requirements for
    administering a federal law. The answer has to do with the severe consequences related to enforcement.

    There is a strategic advantage for states in the way that noncompliance is addressed. States that administer
    the federal programs can work with their industrial manufacturing base and take steps to remediate issues
    while protecting jobs and the tax base for local communities. They also have the option to decide how
    assessed fines are used—whether they go into state coffers or back to the company to be used to fix the
    problems and issues that led up to the noncompliance. When the federal government manages enforcement,
    the funds often go into federal coffers, resulting in some industries closing down and relocating out of the area
    or country. A second benefit is how audits are done at the facility. The federal government only looks at
    federal requirements. They follow the letter of the law, they have their own interpretation on how regulatory
    provisions are interpreted, and they are more willing to let the consequences fall where they will. When states
    own the audit process, they can control how compliance is defined when the requirements are ambiguous for
    the situation, and they also have the opportunity to view state specific requirements in addition to those of
    federal legislation.

    States have the right to customize and add provisions to the federal legislation. What states cannot do is to
    take away from the federal requirements. The provisions they add can be functional equivalents of federal
    regulations that fit better into regional practices and the way that business is conducted in the state. This
    serves as a reminder to consultants looking to come into a state to perform an environmental audit (e.g., ISO
    audits and responsible care audits). It is important to check both the statutes and regulatory requirements of
    federal and state agencies when preparing audit protocols for industrial sites. Some states have taken steps
    to add provisions that establish a separate list of chemicals of concern requiring special attention. For
    example, California has developed regulations around Proposition 65 requiring companies to notify customers

    UNIT III STUDY GUIDE
    The Process of Developing State
    Environmental Laws and Regulations

    [https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state](https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    using container labels that the product contains a carcinogen or a reproductive toxicant (California Office of
    Environmental Health Hazard Assessment [OEHHA], 2014).

    A notification can be made about any level, and no level is too small. Even if the substance to be notified is in
    the product as an impurity at 0.001%, a Proposition 65 warning label is required. The state of California
    chooses not to make an interpretation for citizens on what level is significant leaving it to the consumer to
    decide if this level is relevant. For a limited number of chemicals where test data is available, California is
    willing to use this information to establish a level of significance, but they will not do so using read-across or
    structure-analysis models (OEHHA, 2014). The Proposition 65 requirement allows citizens to bring litigation
    against companies who place products on the market without a Proposition 65 warning label. There are many
    lawyers who have made a healthy living filing lawsuits against noncompliant companies. It is not uncommon
    for a company to sell a product to a customer in Michigan only to have them repurpose the product and send
    it to their customer in California. If the container sold in Michigan does not have a Proposition 65 warning, the
    manufacturer of the product may get sued in California. The defendant will often end up settling out of court,
    as it is often cheaper to do a buyout than to litigate the noncompliance in court.

    States like New Jersey have extra provisions enforcing regulations that they believe are important to their
    population involving “right-to-know” provisions for products sold in their jurisdiction (State of New Jersey,
    Department of Health, n.d.). Companies selling hazardous products in New Jersey have to meet specific
    labeling and notification requirements beyond that required by federal regulations. Multiply this by 50 states,
    and it is not hard to see the challenges that manufacturers face selling products in the 50 states where each
    state has a slightly different set of rules. The EPA watches state initiatives to identify regional concerns and
    trends. While each requirement has its own merits and justification, the EPA is the great unifier. When
    multiple states have aligned on an issue and they begin to implement special regulations ahead of EPA, the
    agency will seek to align these interests and incorporate them in a future regulation. Once the EPA publishes
    their unification rule, states are required to sunset their requirements and align with the federal rule.

    However, until the time comes when the EPA writes a rule for a specific issue, states are free to move forward
    on their own issuing regulations and requirements to satisfy their citizens and special interest groups. This
    process shows one way that states and the EPA communicate on issues and priorities that the EPA is
    requested to take to Congress to consider the merits of the rule for the nation.

    Each state has its own regulatory processes for passing legislation into law and then into regulations to be
    administered by designated agencies responsible for protecting the environment. One of the most active is
    the State of Washington’s Department of Ecology. In Washington, environmental statutory authority is given
    by the legislature when it gives permission to a state agency to write and adopt a rule on an environmental
    subject (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    As with most states, the state of Washington has its own list of definitions for key terms. These do not always
    align among the 50 states. Certain phrases and vocabulary common to Washington may not be the same as
    used in other states. This makes it challenging to compare requirements and to extrapolate regulatory
    interpretations about the rules in Washington to other states like California and New York.

    Washington state has a three-step process for turning a law into a functional regulation. The first phase is to
    make an announcement to the public that the agency is intending to amend, repeal, or adopt a new
    regulation. A brief description of the legislative intent is given as is the contact information of the lead agency
    (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    The second phase proceeds to publish the proposal at least 30 days after the announcement is formally
    made. The proposal is a draft of the rule giving a brief overview of the rule, a copy of the proposed text,
    identification of the lead agency, the proposed enter-into-force date, and information about planned public
    hearings. During this time, all rules start to receive an economic analysis looking at the cost-benefit analysis
    and an analysis of the least-burdensome alternative. These are published on the state website. The impact on
    small businesses is also a part of the analysis as is determining the maximum net benefit to the environment
    (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    Formal public comments are considered by the lead agency. Except for public hearings, written responses
    are necessary for a concern to be considered. For rules where substantial issues are raised, regulators can
    set up committees to work through the issues to reach a resolution. Lead agencies prepare a formal written

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    response to key comments explaining the issue, how they were considered and the final determination made
    by the regulators. Should the regulation ever be litigated in state courts, these comments are valuable source
    documents for lawyers and the courts.

    The final step in the legislative process is to officially adopt the rule after the agency director signs the
    document. The rule will enter into force 31 days after the rule is signed. However, in special cases,
    emergency rules immediately become effective, and rules that are expedited have a 45-day comment period
    after which the rule comes into effect 31 days later (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    Some states have set up alliances to address regional concerns. One of these groups is the Great Lakes
    Commission (GLC), which includes Canadian provinces and the states surrounding the Great Lakes. The
    GLC has established a set of priorities intended to restore the water quality of the lakes and to prevent further
    deterioration of water quality. One of the biggest issues is the runoff of fertilizers from surrounding farmland.
    The runoff contains phosphorus that promotes algal blooms that cover the surface of the lake (Great Lakes
    Commission, 2019). While alive, some species of algae will produce toxic substances. After they die, the
    bacteria in the lakes begin to feast on the algae, consuming the dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water to support
    their feeding frenzy. When the DO levels go from 7.0 ppm to a value <0.5 ppm, the fish die and the water
    quality of the lakes is further degraded. That is not the end. During the time that the algae is being degraded,
    a portion of the phosphorus is released into the water where it will remain to support algal growth in the next
    season.

    This issue is starting to have an impact on industrial products where states limit the use of products
    containing phosphorus. Permit writers are setting very low phosphorus discharge limits for manufacturing
    facilities. Companies are now reviewing their raw materials to ensure that they purchase products free of
    phosphorus. The problem is that phosphorus has a defined function and products that use an alternative in
    their product formulation do not function as well. This raises manufacturing costs and occasionally will result
    in manufactured goods being produced that are of lower quality and less in demand than the products made
    by their competitors.

    Great Lakes states are participating in a restoration bipartisan initiative that addresses a variety of issues.
    Algae, invasive Asian carp, and the leaching of toxics from contaminated waste sites near rivers and the
    shores of the Great Lakes allowing harmful chemicals to flow into the lakes are a few of these issues. The
    GLC states are working in conjunction with federal agencies including the EPA, National Oceanic and
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Army Corp of Engineers on
    special projects. The commission is seeking to implement a farm bill to support agricultural conservation
    programs. Other programs being set up include establishing a fishery preserve and projects to protect
    drinking water (Great Lakes Commission, n.d.).

    In summary, the federal-state partnerships are strong and aligned. As budgets get tighter and the EPA
    remains bound on their role and influence, the success of compliance and pollution prevention programs will
    require more and more states to step up to take on the administration of federal programs.

    References

    California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. (2014). Proposition 65.

    https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65

    Great Lakes Commission. (n.d.). Our work: Advocacy. https://www.glc.org/work/advocacy/

    Great Lakes Commission. (2019, March). Investing in a national asset. https://www.glc.org/wp-

    content/uploads/GLC-Federal-Priorities-2019-FINAL.pdf

    State of New Jersey, Department of Health. (n.d.). Right to know.

    https://www.nj.gov/health/workplacehealthandsafety/right-to-know/

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Washington State Department of Ecology. (n.d.). Rulemaking frequently asked questions.
    https://ecology.wa.gov/About-us/How-we-operate/Laws-rules-rulemaking/Rulemaking-FAQ

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The following website looks at how citizens in each state feel about environmental regulations. Take some
    time to analyze differences and similarities seen from state to state.

    Pew Research Center. (2016). Public support for environmental regulations varies by state.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-
    varies-by-state/

    [https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-varies-by-state/](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-varies-by-state/)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – State Environmental Regulatory Agencies
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources

    **## UnitIIIProject.docx**

    Unit III Project

    Using materials covered in Unit I, II, and III, visit the interactive website
    [epa.gov/research/epa-research-your-state](https://www.epa.gov/research/epa-research-your-state), and review the state laws for air and water from your state or a state of interest to you. You can find this information under the Environmental Info section of each state’s individual page. After exploring the website and doing any other necessary research, compose an essay that addresses the following topics:

    1. Introduce the state you have chosen, and summarize the issues associated with air and water quality and the regulations and programs being adopted by the chosen state to solve those issues.

    2. Briefly explain the federal legislative process that creates laws and regulations.

    3. Analyze whether the programs to address air and water issues will succeed and if they are worth the work hours and costs being spent.

    4. Recommend what you would give to the EPA to address the environmental issues in the state.

    5. Discuss how individuals, industries, and corporations can engage with governmental agencies.

    Your completed project must be at least three pages in length, not counting the title and reference page, and you must use at least one academic source in addition to the EPA website. APA formatting is required. All sources used, including the course textbook, must be referenced. Paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying in-text citations.

    **## UnitIIIStudyGuide.pdf**

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    3. Describe the regulation promulgation process.
    3.1 Discuss state regulations and programs being implemented to solve environmental issues.

    5. Discuss the various roles states play in implementing laws and regulations.

    5.1 Summarize environmental issues in a specific state.
    5.2 Analyze the effectiveness of specific state environmental programs.
    5.3 Recommend solutions to environmental issues in a specific state.

    Required Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). EPA in your state. https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state

    Unit Lesson

    State Environmental Regulatory Agencies

    In this unit, we will discuss jurisdictional issues and relationships with environmental regulatory agencies.
    Rulemaking of environmental laws at the state level follows a similar process to that of federal law. When it
    comes to aligning federal and state environmental laws, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives
    states the option to implement and administer federal environmental law with oversight from the EPA. An
    obvious question is to ask why a state would be willing to take on the expense and staffing requirements for
    administering a federal law. The answer has to do with the severe consequences related to enforcement.

    There is a strategic advantage for states in the way that noncompliance is addressed. States that administer
    the federal programs can work with their industrial manufacturing base and take steps to remediate issues
    while protecting jobs and the tax base for local communities. They also have the option to decide how
    assessed fines are used—whether they go into state coffers or back to the company to be used to fix the
    problems and issues that led up to the noncompliance. When the federal government manages enforcement,
    the funds often go into federal coffers, resulting in some industries closing down and relocating out of the area
    or country. A second benefit is how audits are done at the facility. The federal government only looks at
    federal requirements. They follow the letter of the law, they have their own interpretation on how regulatory
    provisions are interpreted, and they are more willing to let the consequences fall where they will. When states
    own the audit process, they can control how compliance is defined when the requirements are ambiguous for
    the situation, and they also have the opportunity to view state specific requirements in addition to those of
    federal legislation.

    States have the right to customize and add provisions to the federal legislation. What states cannot do is to
    take away from the federal requirements. The provisions they add can be functional equivalents of federal
    regulations that fit better into regional practices and the way that business is conducted in the state. This
    serves as a reminder to consultants looking to come into a state to perform an environmental audit (e.g., ISO
    audits and responsible care audits). It is important to check both the statutes and regulatory requirements of
    federal and state agencies when preparing audit protocols for industrial sites. Some states have taken steps
    to add provisions that establish a separate list of chemicals of concern requiring special attention. For
    example, California has developed regulations around Proposition 65 requiring companies to notify customers

    UNIT III STUDY GUIDE
    The Process of Developing State
    Environmental Laws and Regulations

    [https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state](https://www.epa.gov/home/epa-your-state)

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    using container labels that the product contains a carcinogen or a reproductive toxicant (California Office of
    Environmental Health Hazard Assessment [OEHHA], 2014).

    A notification can be made about any level, and no level is too small. Even if the substance to be notified is in
    the product as an impurity at 0.001%, a Proposition 65 warning label is required. The state of California
    chooses not to make an interpretation for citizens on what level is significant leaving it to the consumer to
    decide if this level is relevant. For a limited number of chemicals where test data is available, California is
    willing to use this information to establish a level of significance, but they will not do so using read-across or
    structure-analysis models (OEHHA, 2014). The Proposition 65 requirement allows citizens to bring litigation
    against companies who place products on the market without a Proposition 65 warning label. There are many
    lawyers who have made a healthy living filing lawsuits against noncompliant companies. It is not uncommon
    for a company to sell a product to a customer in Michigan only to have them repurpose the product and send
    it to their customer in California. If the container sold in Michigan does not have a Proposition 65 warning, the
    manufacturer of the product may get sued in California. The defendant will often end up settling out of court,
    as it is often cheaper to do a buyout than to litigate the noncompliance in court.

    States like New Jersey have extra provisions enforcing regulations that they believe are important to their
    population involving “right-to-know” provisions for products sold in their jurisdiction (State of New Jersey,
    Department of Health, n.d.). Companies selling hazardous products in New Jersey have to meet specific
    labeling and notification requirements beyond that required by federal regulations. Multiply this by 50 states,
    and it is not hard to see the challenges that manufacturers face selling products in the 50 states where each
    state has a slightly different set of rules. The EPA watches state initiatives to identify regional concerns and
    trends. While each requirement has its own merits and justification, the EPA is the great unifier. When
    multiple states have aligned on an issue and they begin to implement special regulations ahead of EPA, the
    agency will seek to align these interests and incorporate them in a future regulation. Once the EPA publishes
    their unification rule, states are required to sunset their requirements and align with the federal rule.

    However, until the time comes when the EPA writes a rule for a specific issue, states are free to move forward
    on their own issuing regulations and requirements to satisfy their citizens and special interest groups. This
    process shows one way that states and the EPA communicate on issues and priorities that the EPA is
    requested to take to Congress to consider the merits of the rule for the nation.

    Each state has its own regulatory processes for passing legislation into law and then into regulations to be
    administered by designated agencies responsible for protecting the environment. One of the most active is
    the State of Washington’s Department of Ecology. In Washington, environmental statutory authority is given
    by the legislature when it gives permission to a state agency to write and adopt a rule on an environmental
    subject (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    As with most states, the state of Washington has its own list of definitions for key terms. These do not always
    align among the 50 states. Certain phrases and vocabulary common to Washington may not be the same as
    used in other states. This makes it challenging to compare requirements and to extrapolate regulatory
    interpretations about the rules in Washington to other states like California and New York.

    Washington state has a three-step process for turning a law into a functional regulation. The first phase is to
    make an announcement to the public that the agency is intending to amend, repeal, or adopt a new
    regulation. A brief description of the legislative intent is given as is the contact information of the lead agency
    (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    The second phase proceeds to publish the proposal at least 30 days after the announcement is formally
    made. The proposal is a draft of the rule giving a brief overview of the rule, a copy of the proposed text,
    identification of the lead agency, the proposed enter-into-force date, and information about planned public
    hearings. During this time, all rules start to receive an economic analysis looking at the cost-benefit analysis
    and an analysis of the least-burdensome alternative. These are published on the state website. The impact on
    small businesses is also a part of the analysis as is determining the maximum net benefit to the environment
    (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    Formal public comments are considered by the lead agency. Except for public hearings, written responses
    are necessary for a concern to be considered. For rules where substantial issues are raised, regulators can
    set up committees to work through the issues to reach a resolution. Lead agencies prepare a formal written

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 3

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    response to key comments explaining the issue, how they were considered and the final determination made
    by the regulators. Should the regulation ever be litigated in state courts, these comments are valuable source
    documents for lawyers and the courts.

    The final step in the legislative process is to officially adopt the rule after the agency director signs the
    document. The rule will enter into force 31 days after the rule is signed. However, in special cases,
    emergency rules immediately become effective, and rules that are expedited have a 45-day comment period
    after which the rule comes into effect 31 days later (Washington State Department of Ecology, n.d.).

    Some states have set up alliances to address regional concerns. One of these groups is the Great Lakes
    Commission (GLC), which includes Canadian provinces and the states surrounding the Great Lakes. The
    GLC has established a set of priorities intended to restore the water quality of the lakes and to prevent further
    deterioration of water quality. One of the biggest issues is the runoff of fertilizers from surrounding farmland.
    The runoff contains phosphorus that promotes algal blooms that cover the surface of the lake (Great Lakes
    Commission, 2019). While alive, some species of algae will produce toxic substances. After they die, the
    bacteria in the lakes begin to feast on the algae, consuming the dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water to support
    their feeding frenzy. When the DO levels go from 7.0 ppm to a value <0.5 ppm, the fish die and the water
    quality of the lakes is further degraded. That is not the end. During the time that the algae is being degraded,
    a portion of the phosphorus is released into the water where it will remain to support algal growth in the next
    season.

    This issue is starting to have an impact on industrial products where states limit the use of products
    containing phosphorus. Permit writers are setting very low phosphorus discharge limits for manufacturing
    facilities. Companies are now reviewing their raw materials to ensure that they purchase products free of
    phosphorus. The problem is that phosphorus has a defined function and products that use an alternative in
    their product formulation do not function as well. This raises manufacturing costs and occasionally will result
    in manufactured goods being produced that are of lower quality and less in demand than the products made
    by their competitors.

    Great Lakes states are participating in a restoration bipartisan initiative that addresses a variety of issues.
    Algae, invasive Asian carp, and the leaching of toxics from contaminated waste sites near rivers and the
    shores of the Great Lakes allowing harmful chemicals to flow into the lakes are a few of these issues. The
    GLC states are working in conjunction with federal agencies including the EPA, National Oceanic and
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Army Corp of Engineers on
    special projects. The commission is seeking to implement a farm bill to support agricultural conservation
    programs. Other programs being set up include establishing a fishery preserve and projects to protect
    drinking water (Great Lakes Commission, n.d.).

    In summary, the federal-state partnerships are strong and aligned. As budgets get tighter and the EPA
    remains bound on their role and influence, the success of compliance and pollution prevention programs will
    require more and more states to step up to take on the administration of federal programs.

    References

    California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. (2014). Proposition 65.

    https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65

    Great Lakes Commission. (n.d.). Our work: Advocacy. https://www.glc.org/work/advocacy/

    Great Lakes Commission. (2019, March). Investing in a national asset. https://www.glc.org/wp-

    content/uploads/GLC-Federal-Priorities-2019-FINAL.pdf

    State of New Jersey, Department of Health. (n.d.). Right to know.

    https://www.nj.gov/health/workplacehealthandsafety/right-to-know/

    OSH 2302, Introduction to Regulatory Compliance 4

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
    Title

    Washington State Department of Ecology. (n.d.). Rulemaking frequently asked questions.
    https://ecology.wa.gov/About-us/How-we-operate/Laws-rules-rulemaking/Rulemaking-FAQ

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The following website looks at how citizens in each state feel about environmental regulations. Take some
    time to analyze differences and similarities seen from state to state.

    Pew Research Center. (2016). Public support for environmental regulations varies by state.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-
    varies-by-state/

    [https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-varies-by-state/](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/25/public-support-for-environmental-regulations-varies-by-state/)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson

    – State Environmental Regulatory Agencies
    – References

    – Suggested Unit Resources

  • [Solved] OSHA DB V

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached **files (1)** – ## DBVOSHA.docx **## DBVOSHA.docx** DB V Do some research on workers' compensation in your state (Georgia), or consider the information provided to you in the suggested resources for the State of Alabama. What do you see as the benefits and drawbacks of workers' compensa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached

    **files (1)**

    – ## DBVOSHA.docx

    **## DBVOSHA.docx**

    DB V

    Do some research on workers' compensation in your state (Georgia), or consider the information provided to you in the suggested resources for the State of Alabama. What do you see as the benefits and drawbacks of workers' compensation to employers and employees? Also, feel free to share any stories you might have related to workers' compensation cases with which you are familiar.

    Response 1: Andrea Kelly

    Top of Form

    According to the Alabama Department of Labor, workers’ compensation is designed to provide medical care and partial wage replacement to employees who are injured on the job. As an international student, I do not know much about the U.S. system, but from what I understand, it is meant to protect both employees and employers.

    For employees, one major benefit is that they can receive support quickly without having to prove fault. This makes it easier to access medical treatment and some income while recovering. However, a drawback is that the benefits are limited, and employees usually cannot sue their employer, even if the injury was caused by negligence.

    For employers, workers’ compensation helps reduce the risk of lawsuits and provides a clear process for handling workplace injuries. However, it can be costly, especially if there are many claims, and there is always a concern about fraudulent cases.

    Overall, in places like Alabama, the system seems to balance both sides, even though it may not fully meet everyone’s expectations.

    Response 2: Travis Vandaveer

    Top of Form

    Texas stands alone among U.S. states when it comes to workers' compensation. Unlike Alabama and nearly every other state, Texas is the only state where workers' compensation insurance is completely voluntary for private employers. This "opt-out" system, sometimes called nonsubscriber status, has been in place since 1913 and creates a very different landscape for both employers and employees here compared to the rest of the country. As of 2022, roughly 25% of private-sector employers in Texas were nonsubscribers, though other sources put that figure closer to 28 percent, meaning nearly 20 percent of Texas's private workforce clocks in without the benefit of a workers' comp safety net.

    From an emergency management perspective, the nonsubscriber issue creates interesting wrinkles during large-scale incidents. When a chemical release, fire, or accident occurs at a Texas facility, first responders may be working a scene where some of the injured workforce has workers' comp coverage and some doesn't. That affects downstream coordination with occupational medicine providers, return-to-work planning, and the legal exposure every entity involved in response and recovery. We control this through good contractor management and vetting at our site, but you must always be cautious of various subcontractors that might float through during turnaround and outages. Texas can still be the "wild west."

    Bottom of Form

    Bottom of Form

    **## DBVOSHA.docx**

    DB V

    Do some research on workers' compensation in your state (Georgia), or consider the information provided to you in the suggested resources for the State of Alabama. What do you see as the benefits and drawbacks of workers' compensation to employers and employees? Also, feel free to share any stories you might have related to workers' compensation cases with which you are familiar.

    Response 1: Andrea Kelly

    Top of Form

    According to the Alabama Department of Labor, workers’ compensation is designed to provide medical care and partial wage replacement to employees who are injured on the job. As an international student, I do not know much about the U.S. system, but from what I understand, it is meant to protect both employees and employers.

    For employees, one major benefit is that they can receive support quickly without having to prove fault. This makes it easier to access medical treatment and some income while recovering. However, a drawback is that the benefits are limited, and employees usually cannot sue their employer, even if the injury was caused by negligence.

    For employers, workers’ compensation helps reduce the risk of lawsuits and provides a clear process for handling workplace injuries. However, it can be costly, especially if there are many claims, and there is always a concern about fraudulent cases.

    Overall, in places like Alabama, the system seems to balance both sides, even though it may not fully meet everyone’s expectations.

    Response 2: Travis Vandaveer

    Top of Form

    Texas stands alone among U.S. states when it comes to workers' compensation. Unlike Alabama and nearly every other state, Texas is the only state where workers' compensation insurance is completely voluntary for private employers. This "opt-out" system, sometimes called nonsubscriber status, has been in place since 1913 and creates a very different landscape for both employers and employees here compared to the rest of the country. As of 2022, roughly 25% of private-sector employers in Texas were nonsubscribers, though other sources put that figure closer to 28 percent, meaning nearly 20 percent of Texas's private workforce clocks in without the benefit of a workers' comp safety net.

    From an emergency management perspective, the nonsubscriber issue creates interesting wrinkles during large-scale incidents. When a chemical release, fire, or accident occurs at a Texas facility, first responders may be working a scene where some of the injured workforce has workers' comp coverage and some doesn't. That affects downstream coordination with occupational medicine providers, return-to-work planning, and the legal exposure every entity involved in response and recovery. We control this through good contractor management and vetting at our site, but you must always be cautious of various subcontractors that might float through during turnaround and outages. Texas can still be the "wild west."

    Bottom of Form

    Bottom of Form

  • [Solved] Enviromental Science

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attachment. **files (1)** – ## Week_4_Home_Chemicals_Lab.docx **## Week_4_Home_Chemicals_Lab.docx** **![PDF Header Design 1A](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/enviromental-science-20971367)** **Resources/Waste: Home Chemicals** **Introduction** **Chemical Connections** Chemicals are …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attachment.

    **files (1)**

    – ## Week_4_Home_Chemicals_Lab.docx

    **## Week_4_Home_Chemicals_Lab.docx**

    **![PDF Header Design 1A](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/enviromental-science-20971367)**

    **Resources/Waste: Home Chemicals**

    **Introduction**

    **Chemical Connections**

    Chemicals are everywhere, in the air you breathe, in the food you eat, and in the chair you’re sitting on. Moreover, you’re mostly chemicals. Ninety nine percent of the human body is composed of just 6 chemical elements: oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus. After you die, you’ll decompose into hydrogen, nitrogen, water, ammonia, carbon dioxide, phosphoric acid, and sulfuric acid. So, from chemicals we come and to chemicals we go.

    **Fig. 1: Periodic Table (**
    **_NASA_)**

    Chemical elements are substances that contain one kind of atom and cannot be separated into simpler substances. There are 116 known chemical elements, of which 91 occur naturally. The other 25 are man-made. These elements are listed in the periodic table. Go to
    [http://www.iupac.org/reports/periodic_table/](http://www.iupac.org/reports/periodic_table/). Scroll down below the table and you’ll see the elements listed. Many of them will be familiar to you.

    Chemical compounds are formed by the combination of two or more elements. The one you’re probably most familiar with is H20, two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen, also known as water. Other common compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) or salt, glucose (C12H22O11) or sugar, and CH3COOC6H4COOH or aspirin. Chemicals are used in a wide range of industrial and commercial applications including plastics, adhesives, absorbents, fertilizers, detergents, dyes, explosives, oils, inks, lubricants, metals, paper, insecticides, pharmaceuticals, solvents, waxes, photography, food additives and on and on. So, you see, chemicals are everywhere.

    There are several ways to classify chemicals. Organic chemicals are those chemicals that contain the element carbon, C. Organic chemicals can be broken down by micro-organisms and reactions with other chemicals, as well as photo chemically by ultraviolet or visible light. The rate at which a chemical degrades is expressed as half-life, the amount of time it takes for half of the chemical to be converted into some other chemical or element. Generally, organic chemicals biodegrade or decompose more rapidly than inorganic chemicals, which do not contain carbon. Inorganic chemicals include salt, asbestos, and silicates as well as minerals such as iron, aluminum, and phosphorus, among others.

    Chemicals can also be either natural or synthetic. Natural chemicals are those which are found occurring in the environment which are not introduced by humans. Synthetic chemicals are those which are developed by humans and do not exist in nature. It might be easy to assume that natural, organic chemicals are less harmful to humans. This is not the case as many poisons come from plants and animals.

    **Chemicals in Your Home**

    This exercise involves conducting an inventory of the types of chemicals in your home. As this is a multi-part exercise, it might be wise to save the exercise on your hard drive and then use the saved file for completing your answer. This way you won’t lost any of the work you’ve completed if you machines freezes or crashes.

    **Activity – Household Chemical Inventory and Assessment**

    Identify one product that you use for each of the categories on the Activity Sheet. If you do not use a particular category of product, simply enter the phrase "do not use" and explain why. For example, if you do not use pet care products, enter “do not use” in the “Product Name” column and “do not have a pet” in the “What the Warning Says” column.

    For each product identified that you do use indicate the following:

    1. The product name

    2. What the product does, also known as the product “service”

    3. Whether there is some type of warning about using the product.

    4. What the warning says.

    Answer questions 1 & 2 on the Activity Sheet when you have completed the inventory.

    After doing this, select three products from your household product list which you think may be “hazardous” based on the warnings listed on the products. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency defines hazardous as any material that is ignitable, corrosive, explosive, or toxic to humans, plants or animals. List the three products on the Activity Sheet.

    The Consumer Products Information Database (CPID) maintains a database that contains a wide variety of information on over 21,000 consumer products. Information contained in the data base includes the chemical ingredients, the manufacturer and contact information, as well as any possible acute and chronic effects associated with the chemicals that make up the products.

    Go to the CPID website at the following link:
    [https://www.whatsinproducts.com/](https://www.whatsinproducts.com/) In the Quick Search box on the upper-right side of the screen, look up the first potentially hazardous product you have listed. Scroll down the page until you come to the link “View Safety Data Sheet (SDS)” (below Health Effects Information), follow the directions on the remainder of the Activity Sheet and answer the questions.

    **References**

    http://chemistry.about.com/cs/5/f/blpoison.htm

    http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/285/8/1059

    [http://dl.clackamas.cc.or.us/ch104-10/(1).htm](http://dl.clackamas.cc.or.us/ch104-10/(1).htm)

    [http://www.cleaningpro.com/toxic.cfm](http://www.cleaningpro.com/toxic.cfm)

    [http://www.chem-tox.com/](http://www.chem-tox.com/)

    [http://www.healthychildrenproject.org/exposures/chemicals.html](http://www.healthychildrenproject.org/exposures/chemicals.html)

    [http://www.safe2use.com/ca-ipm/01-11-14a.htm](http://www.safe2use.com/ca-ipm/01-11-14a.htm)

    http://www.scorecard.org/

    http://www.chennaionline.com/science/Environment/harm.asp

    http://www.worldwildlife.org/toxics/basic.cfm

    http://www.wwf.pl/0406281352_newsen.php

    http://chemistry.about.com/cs/5/f/blpoison.htm

    http://www.mamashealth.com/doc/cleanprod.asp

    http://www.touregypt.net/chemicals.htm

    http://es.epa.gov/techinfo/facts/safe-fs.html

    http://www.chemicalindustryarchives.org/factfiction/testing.asp

    http://www.scorecard.org/chemical-profiles/def/hpv.html

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | ## ESA21: Environmental Science Activities | Activity Sheet<br>Home Chemicals |

    Name:

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Product Category | Product Name | What Product Does | Warning (yes/no) | What the Warning Says |
    | Auto Products | | | | |
    | Pesticides | | | | |
    | Personal Care | | | | |
    | Arts & Crafts | | | | |
    | Inside the Home | | | | |
    | Landscape & Yard | | | | |
    | Home Maintenance | | | | |
    | Pet Care | | | | |

    1. (5 points) Was this inventory difficult to complete? Why or why not?

    2. (5 points) Are you surprised by the results of the inventory? If so, in what way?

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Potentially Hazardous Products |
    | 1. | 2. | 3. |

    **MSDS**

    3. (5 points) Where does the Health Effects Information come from?

    4. (5 points) Who develops or prepares the Safety Data Sheet (SDS)?

    5. (5 points) Does the SDS provide any health effects or first aid information?

    6. (5 points) Who is SDS
    _not_ intended for?

    7. (5 points) Are SDS’s relevant to consumers?

    Go back to the product you searched and look under Health Effect Information to answer the following questions.

    8. (5 points) What is the HMIS rating for your product? (Note: Your product may not have a health rating. If it does not, choose another product that does.

    9. (5 points) What does that rating mean?

    10. (5 points) What is the flammability rating for your product?

    11. (5 points) What does that rating mean?

    12. (5 points) What is the reactivity rating for your product?

    13. (5 points) What does that rating mean?

    Now scroll down further until you come to the section “Acute health effects” and “Chronic health effects.” Answer the following questions.

    14. (5 points) What does the website say about any acute health effects from the product?

    15. (5 points) What does the website say about any chronic health effects from the product?

    16. (5 points) What is the difference between an acute and chronic health effect?

    17. (5 points) Based on your research/analysis, how hazardous is the product?

    Go back to the NIH website and research your other two products. If a product you selected is not listed, pick another product from your original list of eight. At the conclusion of this step in the exercise, you should have looked up and found results for 3 products.

    18. (5 points) Rank order your 3 products based on your assessment of how hazardous they are and list below from most to least hazardous.

    | |
    | — |
    | Hazardous Ranking |
    | 1. |
    | 2. |
    | 3. |

    19. (5 points) Explain you answer. Why did you choose the ranking that you did?

    20. (5 points) How comprehensive do you feel the information provided by the website is regarding the hazardous nature of household products?

    ## image1.jpeg

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png

    **## Week_4_Home_Chemicals_Lab.docx**

    **![PDF Header Design 1A](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/enviromental-science-20971367)**

    **Resources/Waste: Home Chemicals**

    **Introduction**

    **Chemical Connections**

    Chemicals are everywhere, in the air you breathe, in the food you eat, and in the chair you’re sitting on. Moreover, you’re mostly chemicals. Ninety nine percent of the human body is composed of just 6 chemical elements: oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus. After you die, you’ll decompose into hydrogen, nitrogen, water, ammonia, carbon dioxide, phosphoric acid, and sulfuric acid. So, from chemicals we come and to chemicals we go.

    **Fig. 1: Periodic Table (**
    **_NASA_)**

    Chemical elements are substances that contain one kind of atom and cannot be separated into simpler substances. There are 116 known chemical elements, of which 91 occur naturally. The other 25 are man-made. These elements are listed in the periodic table. Go to
    [http://www.iupac.org/reports/periodic_table/](http://www.iupac.org/reports/periodic_table/). Scroll down below the table and you’ll see the elements listed. Many of them will be familiar to you.

    Chemical compounds are formed by the combination of two or more elements. The one you’re probably most familiar with is H20, two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen, also known as water. Other common compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) or salt, glucose (C12H22O11) or sugar, and CH3COOC6H4COOH or aspirin. Chemicals are used in a wide range of industrial and commercial applications including plastics, adhesives, absorbents, fertilizers, detergents, dyes, explosives, oils, inks, lubricants, metals, paper, insecticides, pharmaceuticals, solvents, waxes, photography, food additives and on and on. So, you see, chemicals are everywhere.

    There are several ways to classify chemicals. Organic chemicals are those chemicals that contain the element carbon, C. Organic chemicals can be broken down by micro-organisms and reactions with other chemicals, as well as photo chemically by ultraviolet or visible light. The rate at which a chemical degrades is expressed as half-life, the amount of time it takes for half of the chemical to be converted into some other chemical or element. Generally, organic chemicals biodegrade or decompose more rapidly than inorganic chemicals, which do not contain carbon. Inorganic chemicals include salt, asbestos, and silicates as well as minerals such as iron, aluminum, and phosphorus, among others.

    Chemicals can also be either natural or synthetic. Natural chemicals are those which are found occurring in the environment which are not introduced by humans. Synthetic chemicals are those which are developed by humans and do not exist in nature. It might be easy to assume that natural, organic chemicals are less harmful to humans. This is not the case as many poisons come from plants and animals.

    **Chemicals in Your Home**

    This exercise involves conducting an inventory of the types of chemicals in your home. As this is a multi-part exercise, it might be wise to save the exercise on your hard drive and then use the saved file for completing your answer. This way you won’t lost any of the work you’ve completed if you machines freezes or crashes.

    **Activity – Household Chemical Inventory and Assessment**

    Identify one product that you use for each of the categories on the Activity Sheet. If you do not use a particular category of product, simply enter the phrase "do not use" and explain why. For example, if you do not use pet care products, enter “do not use” in the “Product Name” column and “do not have a pet” in the “What the Warning Says” column.

    For each product identified that you do use indicate the following:

    1. The product name

    2. What the product does, also known as the product “service”

    3. Whether there is some type of warning about using the product.

    4. What the warning says.

    Answer questions 1 & 2 on the Activity Sheet when you have completed the inventory.

    After doing this, select three products from your household product list which you think may be “hazardous” based on the warnings listed on the products. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency defines hazardous as any material that is ignitable, corrosive, explosive, or toxic to humans, plants or animals. List the three products on the Activity Sheet.

    The Consumer Products Information Database (CPID) maintains a database that contains a wide variety of information on over 21,000 consumer products. Information contained in the data base includes the chemical ingredients, the manufacturer and contact information, as well as any possible acute and chronic effects associated with the chemicals that make up the products.

    Go to the CPID website at the following link:
    [https://www.whatsinproducts.com/](https://www.whatsinproducts.com/) In the Quick Search box on the upper-right side of the screen, look up the first potentially hazardous product you have listed. Scroll down the page until you come to the link “View Safety Data Sheet (SDS)” (below Health Effects Information), follow the directions on the remainder of the Activity Sheet and answer the questions.

    **References**

    http://chemistry.about.com/cs/5/f/blpoison.htm

    http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/285/8/1059

    [http://dl.clackamas.cc.or.us/ch104-10/(1).htm](http://dl.clackamas.cc.or.us/ch104-10/(1).htm)

    [http://www.cleaningpro.com/toxic.cfm](http://www.cleaningpro.com/toxic.cfm)

    [http://www.chem-tox.com/](http://www.chem-tox.com/)

    [http://www.healthychildrenproject.org/exposures/chemicals.html](http://www.healthychildrenproject.org/exposures/chemicals.html)

    [http://www.safe2use.com/ca-ipm/01-11-14a.htm](http://www.safe2use.com/ca-ipm/01-11-14a.htm)

    http://www.scorecard.org/

    http://www.chennaionline.com/science/Environment/harm.asp

    http://www.worldwildlife.org/toxics/basic.cfm

    http://www.wwf.pl/0406281352_newsen.php

    http://chemistry.about.com/cs/5/f/blpoison.htm

    http://www.mamashealth.com/doc/cleanprod.asp

    http://www.touregypt.net/chemicals.htm

    http://es.epa.gov/techinfo/facts/safe-fs.html

    http://www.chemicalindustryarchives.org/factfiction/testing.asp

    http://www.scorecard.org/chemical-profiles/def/hpv.html

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | ## ESA21: Environmental Science Activities | Activity Sheet<br>Home Chemicals |

    Name:

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Product Category | Product Name | What Product Does | Warning (yes/no) | What the Warning Says |
    | Auto Products | | | | |
    | Pesticides | | | | |
    | Personal Care | | | | |
    | Arts & Crafts | | | | |
    | Inside the Home | | | | |
    | Landscape & Yard | | | | |
    | Home Maintenance | | | | |
    | Pet Care | | | | |

    1. (5 points) Was this inventory difficult to complete? Why or why not?

    2. (5 points) Are you surprised by the results of the inventory? If so, in what way?

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | Potentially Hazardous Products |
    | 1. | 2. | 3. |

    **MSDS**

    3. (5 points) Where does the Health Effects Information come from?

    4. (5 points) Who develops or prepares the Safety Data Sheet (SDS)?

    5. (5 points) Does the SDS provide any health effects or first aid information?

    6. (5 points) Who is SDS
    _not_ intended for?

    7. (5 points) Are SDS’s relevant to consumers?

    Go back to the product you searched and look under Health Effect Information to answer the following questions.

    8. (5 points) What is the HMIS rating for your product? (Note: Your product may not have a health rating. If it does not, choose another product that does.

    9. (5 points) What does that rating mean?

    10. (5 points) What is the flammability rating for your product?

    11. (5 points) What does that rating mean?

    12. (5 points) What is the reactivity rating for your product?

    13. (5 points) What does that rating mean?

    Now scroll down further until you come to the section “Acute health effects” and “Chronic health effects.” Answer the following questions.

    14. (5 points) What does the website say about any acute health effects from the product?

    15. (5 points) What does the website say about any chronic health effects from the product?

    16. (5 points) What is the difference between an acute and chronic health effect?

    17. (5 points) Based on your research/analysis, how hazardous is the product?

    Go back to the NIH website and research your other two products. If a product you selected is not listed, pick another product from your original list of eight. At the conclusion of this step in the exercise, you should have looked up and found results for 3 products.

    18. (5 points) Rank order your 3 products based on your assessment of how hazardous they are and list below from most to least hazardous.

    | |
    | — |
    | Hazardous Ranking |
    | 1. |
    | 2. |
    | 3. |

    19. (5 points) Explain you answer. Why did you choose the ranking that you did?

    20. (5 points) How comprehensive do you feel the information provided by the website is regarding the hazardous nature of household products?

    ## image1.jpeg

    ## image2.png

    ## image3.png