[Solved] Journal Response MODULE 7

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

nurse innovator

**files (2)**

– ## JournalQuestion_WEEK7.docx

– ## Module7-JournalRUBRIC.docx

**## JournalQuestion_WEEK7.docx**

**Overview**

This module will lead you through the necessary steps one must take to transition the evidence into practice successfully. As a Doctorate in Nursing Practice (DNP) innovator, you may face unexpected barriers hindering the change implementation. These barriers may be related to the organization, the research, finances, or unique to you personally. How you approach the challenges could profoundly affect your implementation. The best practice is to be organized and systematic with your approach to the implementation, including all necessary stakeholders, planning for contingencies, establishing timelines, using a framework, and being a professional DNP role model.

This week, students will reflect on the necessary qualities of a DNP innovator and continue developing Chapter Two by focusing on writing the literature review. As you approach the development of your literature review, remember the review is a synthesis of your themed findings that support your DNP project gap. You are not writing a research paper informing the reader of the background. Please see the supporting materials in the course and DNP Lounge related to crafting the literature review.

**Journal Question:**

Think of a nurse innovator. What characteristics does that person have? How might you model these characteristics as you are transitioning into the Doctor of Nursing Practice role? How will you leverage these characteristics to help you be a change agent for your project?

**Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words.**

**No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

**Reference**

Finkelman, A. (2020).
_Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing_ (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531. Read chapter 11.

Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).
_Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN:978-1-274-22632-4. Read chapters 16 & 17.

**## Module7-JournalRUBRIC.docx**

4/12/26, 8:56 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

4/12/26, 8:56 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

**Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1:** Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets Expectations**

**Exceeds Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Claim/Quality of

Information

Weight: 40%

/ 8

0

points

**pts**

**)**

**(0**

Response to quiz

question is missing

or inaccurate.

Answer is inaccurate

and does not ad

–

dress the prompt.

2.5

points

**(5.6**

**pts**

**)**

Response to quiz

question is missing

key elements.

Answer is partially

inaccurate and

misses elements in

the prompt. Claims

are lacking informa

–

tion to be fully

thought out.

6.4

points

**)**

**pts**

**(6.4**

Response to quiz

question is appropri

–

ate and accurate.

Answer is appropri

–

ate and responses

to the prompt.

Claims are

appropriate.

8

points

**(8**

**pts**

**)**

Response to quiz

question is thorough

and detailed.

Answer is clear and

concise and re

–

sponses to all as

–

pects of the prompt.

Claims are justified

and plausible.


**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

14

points minimum

**Level 3**

16

points minimum

**Level 4**

20

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269461/View 1/3

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269461/View 1/3

1/3

## image1.png

**## Module7-JournalRUBRIC.docx**

4/12/26, 8:56 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

4/12/26, 8:56 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

**Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1:** Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets Expectations**

**Exceeds Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Claim/Quality of

Information

Weight: 40%

/ 8

0

points

**pts**

**)**

**(0**

Response to quiz

question is missing

or inaccurate.

Answer is inaccurate

and does not ad

–

dress the prompt.

2.5

points

**(5.6**

**pts**

**)**

Response to quiz

question is missing

key elements.

Answer is partially

inaccurate and

misses elements in

the prompt. Claims

are lacking informa

–

tion to be fully

thought out.

6.4

points

**)**

**pts**

**(6.4**

Response to quiz

question is appropri

–

ate and accurate.

Answer is appropri

–

ate and responses

to the prompt.

Claims are

appropriate.

8

points

**(8**

**pts**

**)**

Response to quiz

question is thorough

and detailed.

Answer is clear and

concise and re

–

sponses to all as

–

pects of the prompt.

Claims are justified

and plausible.


**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

14

points minimum

**Level 3**

16

points minimum

**Level 4**

20

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269461/View 1/3

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269461/View 1/3

1/3

## image1.png

**## JournalQuestion_WEEK7.docx**

**Overview**

This module will lead you through the necessary steps one must take to transition the evidence into practice successfully. As a Doctorate in Nursing Practice (DNP) innovator, you may face unexpected barriers hindering the change implementation. These barriers may be related to the organization, the research, finances, or unique to you personally. How you approach the challenges could profoundly affect your implementation. The best practice is to be organized and systematic with your approach to the implementation, including all necessary stakeholders, planning for contingencies, establishing timelines, using a framework, and being a professional DNP role model.

This week, students will reflect on the necessary qualities of a DNP innovator and continue developing Chapter Two by focusing on writing the literature review. As you approach the development of your literature review, remember the review is a synthesis of your themed findings that support your DNP project gap. You are not writing a research paper informing the reader of the background. Please see the supporting materials in the course and DNP Lounge related to crafting the literature review.

**Journal Question:**

Think of a nurse innovator. What characteristics does that person have? How might you model these characteristics as you are transitioning into the Doctor of Nursing Practice role? How will you leverage these characteristics to help you be a change agent for your project?

**Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words.**

**No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

**Reference**

Finkelman, A. (2020).
_Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing_ (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531. Read chapter 11.

Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).
_Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN:978-1-274-22632-4. Read chapters 16 & 17.

**## Module7-JournalRUBRIC.docx**

4/12/26, 8:56 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

4/12/26, 8:56 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

**Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1:** Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets Expectations**

**Exceeds Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Claim/Quality of

Information

Weight: 40%

/ 8

0

points

**pts**

**)**

**(0**

Response to quiz

question is missing

or inaccurate.

Answer is inaccurate

and does not ad

–

dress the prompt.

2.5

points

**(5.6**

**pts**

**)**

Response to quiz

question is missing

key elements.

Answer is partially

inaccurate and

misses elements in

the prompt. Claims

are lacking informa

–

tion to be fully

thought out.

6.4

points

**)**

**pts**

**(6.4**

Response to quiz

question is appropri

–

ate and accurate.

Answer is appropri

–

ate and responses

to the prompt.

Claims are

appropriate.

8

points

**(8**

**pts**

**)**

Response to quiz

question is thorough

and detailed.

Answer is clear and

concise and re

–

sponses to all as

–

pects of the prompt.

Claims are justified

and plausible.


**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

14

points minimum

**Level 3**

16

points minimum

**Level 4**

20

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269461/View 1/3

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269461/View 1/3

1/3

## image1.png

**## JournalQuestion_WEEK7.docx**

**Overview**

This module will lead you through the necessary steps one must take to transition the evidence into practice successfully. As a Doctorate in Nursing Practice (DNP) innovator, you may face unexpected barriers hindering the change implementation. These barriers may be related to the organization, the research, finances, or unique to you personally. How you approach the challenges could profoundly affect your implementation. The best practice is to be organized and systematic with your approach to the implementation, including all necessary stakeholders, planning for contingencies, establishing timelines, using a framework, and being a professional DNP role model.

This week, students will reflect on the necessary qualities of a DNP innovator and continue developing Chapter Two by focusing on writing the literature review. As you approach the development of your literature review, remember the review is a synthesis of your themed findings that support your DNP project gap. You are not writing a research paper informing the reader of the background. Please see the supporting materials in the course and DNP Lounge related to crafting the literature review.

**Journal Question:**

Think of a nurse innovator. What characteristics does that person have? How might you model these characteristics as you are transitioning into the Doctor of Nursing Practice role? How will you leverage these characteristics to help you be a change agent for your project?

**Each short-answer Journal response will be a minimum of 300 words.**

**No citation, reference, or APA style is necessary.**

**Reference**

Finkelman, A. (2020).
_Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing_ (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531. Read chapter 11.

Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).
_Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research_ (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN:978-1-274-22632-4. Read chapters 16 & 17.

**## Module7-JournalRUBRIC.docx**

4/12/26, 8:56 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

4/12/26, 8:56 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 – DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement – Aspen University Classroom

**Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1:** Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

Criteria

**Does Not Meet**

**Expectations**

**Approaches**

**Expectations**

**Meets Expectations**

**Exceeds Expectations**

**Criterion Score**

Claim/Quality of

Information

Weight: 40%

/ 8

0

points

**pts**

**)**

**(0**

Response to quiz

question is missing

or inaccurate.

Answer is inaccurate

and does not ad

–

dress the prompt.

2.5

points

**(5.6**

**pts**

**)**

Response to quiz

question is missing

key elements.

Answer is partially

inaccurate and

misses elements in

the prompt. Claims

are lacking informa

–

tion to be fully

thought out.

6.4

points

**)**

**pts**

**(6.4**

Response to quiz

question is appropri

–

ate and accurate.

Answer is appropri

–

ate and responses

to the prompt.

Claims are

appropriate.

8

points

**(8**

**pts**

**)**

Response to quiz

question is thorough

and detailed.

Answer is clear and

concise and re

–

sponses to all as

–

pects of the prompt.

Claims are justified

and plausible.


**Overall Score**

**Level 1**

0

points minimum

**Level 2**

14

points minimum

**Level 3**

16

points minimum

**Level 4**

20

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269461/View 1/3

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269461/View 1/3

1/3

## image1.png